Comparison of Once- Versus Twice-Daily Administration of Insulin Detemir, Used With Mealtime Insulin Aspart, in Basal-Bolus Therapy for Type 1 Diabetes Assessment of Detemir Administration in a Progressive Treat-To-Target Trial (ADAPT)

被引:37
作者
Le Floch, Jean-Pierre [1 ]
Levy, Marc [2 ]
Mosnier-Pudar, Helen [3 ]
Nobels, Frank [4 ]
Laroche, Sylvie [5 ]
Gonbert, Sophie [5 ]
Eschwege, Eveline [6 ]
Fontaine, Pierre [7 ]
机构
[1] Med Clin, Villecresnes, France
[2] Max Fourestier Hosp, Nanterre, France
[3] Cochin Hosp, Paris, France
[4] OL Vrouwziekenhuis Hosp, Aaslt, Belgium
[5] Novo Nordisk Pharmaceut, Paris, France
[6] INSERM, U780, Villejuif, France
[7] Clin Marc Linquette, Lille, France
关键词
NPH INSULIN; DOSE-RESPONSE; GLARGINE; VARIABILITY; PEOPLE; INJECTION; EFFICACY; ANALOG;
D O I
10.2337/dc08-0332
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
OBJECTIVE - The purpose Of this Study was to compare effects of insulin detemir once daily versus twice a day in a basal-bolus insulin regimen. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS - In this open-label, 7-month Study 520, I patients with type I diabetes were randomly assigned to receive detemir once daily or twice daily with mealtime insulin aspart. Insulin doses were titrated over I month, with patients followed up over the subsequent 3 months. Thereafter, patients were able to switch from one regimen to the other, with an additional nonrandomized 3-month follow-up, to a total of 7 months. The primary end point was A1C at 4 months, with noninferiority defined as a difference <0.4% between groups. RESULTS - A1C at 4 months was 8.1 +/- 0.9 versus 8.0 +/- 1.0% with once- and twice-daily detemir, respectively, with an adjusted between-group difference of 0.12% (95% Cl-0.01 to 0.25%), showing noninferiority for once-daily dosing. Similar results were found in the per protocol population. Improvement in A1C was similar in both groups (-0.4 +/- 0.8 vs. -0.5 +/- 0.8%; P = 0.09, NS) but with differences in the 7-point glucose profile. Detemir doses were lower (29 +/- 18 vs. 39 +/- 20 units/day, P < 0.001), but aspart doses were higher (34 +/- 17 vs. 26 +/- 14 IU/day, P < 0.001) with once-daily detemir. At 7 months, A1C decreased slightly in patients switched from once-daily to twice-daily administration (8.2 +/- 0.8 vs. 8.0 +/- 0.8%; P = 0.34, NS) in association with increased total insulin doses (P < 0.05), but A1C increased in those switched from twice-daily to once-daily administration (7.2 +/- 0.9 vs. 7.6 +/- 0.8%, P < 0.05) in association with decreased doses (P < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS - Although some individuals may benefit from twice-daily closing, the most suitable routine starting schedule for detemir in a basal-bolus regimen for type 1 diabetes is once-daily injection.
引用
收藏
页码:32 / 37
页数:6
相关论文
共 18 条
  • [1] Efficacy of conversion from bedtime NPH insulin injection to once- or twice-daily injections of insulin glargine in type 1 diabetic patients using basal/bolus therapy
    Albright, ES
    Desmond, R
    Bell, DSH
    [J]. DIABETES CARE, 2004, 27 (02) : 632 - 633
  • [2] Twice-daily compared with once-daily insulin glargine in people with Type 1 diabetes using meal-time insulin aspart
    Ashwell, S. G.
    Gebbie, J.
    Home, P. D.
    [J]. DIABETIC MEDICINE, 2006, 23 (08) : 879 - 886
  • [3] Optimal timing of injection of once-daily insulin glargine in people with Type 1 diabetes using insulin lispro at meal-times
    Ashwell, SG
    Gebbie, J
    Home, PD
    [J]. DIABETIC MEDICINE, 2006, 23 (01) : 46 - 52
  • [4] Refining basal insulin therapy: what have we learned in the age of analogues?
    DeVries, J. H.
    Nattrass, M.
    Pieber, T. R.
    [J]. DIABETES-METABOLISM RESEARCH AND REVIEWS, 2007, 23 (06) : 441 - 454
  • [5] Safety and efficacy of insulin detemir in clinical practice:: 14-week follow-up data from type 1 and type 2 diabetes patients in the PREDICTIVETM European cohort
    Dornhorst, A.
    Lueddeke, H-J
    Sreenan, S.
    Koenen, C.
    Hansen, J. B.
    Tsur, A.
    Landstedt-Hallin, L.
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PRACTICE, 2007, 61 (03) : 523 - 528
  • [6] Improved glycemic control without an increase in severe hypoglycemic episodes in intensively treated patients with type I diabetes receiving morning, evening, or split dose insulin glargine
    Garg, SK
    Gottlieb, PA
    Hisatomi, ME
    D'Souza, A
    Walker, AJ
    Izuora, KE
    Chase, HP
    [J]. DIABETES RESEARCH AND CLINICAL PRACTICE, 2004, 66 (01) : 49 - 56
  • [7] The mechanism of protraction of insulin detemir, a long-acting, acylated analog of human insulin
    Havelund, S
    Plum, A
    Ribel, U
    Jonassen, I
    Volund, A
    Markussen, J
    Kurtzhals, P
    [J]. PHARMACEUTICAL RESEARCH, 2004, 21 (08) : 1498 - 1504
  • [8] Towards peakless, reproducible and long-acting insulins. An assessment of the basal analogues based on isoglycaemic clamp studies
    Heise, T.
    Pieber, T. R.
    [J]. DIABETES OBESITY & METABOLISM, 2007, 9 (05) : 648 - 659
  • [9] Lower within-subject variability of insulin detemir in comparison to NPH insulin and insulin glargine in people with type 1 diabetes
    Heise, T
    Nosek, L
    Ronn, BB
    Endahl, L
    Heinemann, L
    Kapitza, C
    Draeger, E
    [J]. DIABETES, 2004, 53 (06) : 1614 - 1620
  • [10] Does insulin detemir have a role in reducing risk of insulin-associated weight gain?
    Hermansen, K.
    Davies, M.
    [J]. DIABETES OBESITY & METABOLISM, 2007, 9 (03) : 209 - 217