共 18 条
Comparison of Once- Versus Twice-Daily Administration of Insulin Detemir, Used With Mealtime Insulin Aspart, in Basal-Bolus Therapy for Type 1 Diabetes Assessment of Detemir Administration in a Progressive Treat-To-Target Trial (ADAPT)
被引:37
作者:
Le Floch, Jean-Pierre
[1
]
Levy, Marc
[2
]
Mosnier-Pudar, Helen
[3
]
Nobels, Frank
[4
]
Laroche, Sylvie
[5
]
Gonbert, Sophie
[5
]
Eschwege, Eveline
[6
]
Fontaine, Pierre
[7
]
机构:
[1] Med Clin, Villecresnes, France
[2] Max Fourestier Hosp, Nanterre, France
[3] Cochin Hosp, Paris, France
[4] OL Vrouwziekenhuis Hosp, Aaslt, Belgium
[5] Novo Nordisk Pharmaceut, Paris, France
[6] INSERM, U780, Villejuif, France
[7] Clin Marc Linquette, Lille, France
关键词:
NPH INSULIN;
DOSE-RESPONSE;
GLARGINE;
VARIABILITY;
PEOPLE;
INJECTION;
EFFICACY;
ANALOG;
D O I:
10.2337/dc08-0332
中图分类号:
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号:
1002 ;
100201 ;
摘要:
OBJECTIVE - The purpose Of this Study was to compare effects of insulin detemir once daily versus twice a day in a basal-bolus insulin regimen. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS - In this open-label, 7-month Study 520, I patients with type I diabetes were randomly assigned to receive detemir once daily or twice daily with mealtime insulin aspart. Insulin doses were titrated over I month, with patients followed up over the subsequent 3 months. Thereafter, patients were able to switch from one regimen to the other, with an additional nonrandomized 3-month follow-up, to a total of 7 months. The primary end point was A1C at 4 months, with noninferiority defined as a difference <0.4% between groups. RESULTS - A1C at 4 months was 8.1 +/- 0.9 versus 8.0 +/- 1.0% with once- and twice-daily detemir, respectively, with an adjusted between-group difference of 0.12% (95% Cl-0.01 to 0.25%), showing noninferiority for once-daily dosing. Similar results were found in the per protocol population. Improvement in A1C was similar in both groups (-0.4 +/- 0.8 vs. -0.5 +/- 0.8%; P = 0.09, NS) but with differences in the 7-point glucose profile. Detemir doses were lower (29 +/- 18 vs. 39 +/- 20 units/day, P < 0.001), but aspart doses were higher (34 +/- 17 vs. 26 +/- 14 IU/day, P < 0.001) with once-daily detemir. At 7 months, A1C decreased slightly in patients switched from once-daily to twice-daily administration (8.2 +/- 0.8 vs. 8.0 +/- 0.8%; P = 0.34, NS) in association with increased total insulin doses (P < 0.05), but A1C increased in those switched from twice-daily to once-daily administration (7.2 +/- 0.9 vs. 7.6 +/- 0.8%, P < 0.05) in association with decreased doses (P < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS - Although some individuals may benefit from twice-daily closing, the most suitable routine starting schedule for detemir in a basal-bolus regimen for type 1 diabetes is once-daily injection.
引用
收藏
页码:32 / 37
页数:6
相关论文