Linking conflict strategy to the five-factor model: Theoretical and empirical foundations

被引:70
作者
Moberg, PJ [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Akron, Dept Psychol, Akron, OH 44325 USA
关键词
D O I
10.1108/eb022849
中图分类号
G2 [信息与知识传播];
学科分类号
05 ; 0503 ;
摘要
The present study examines the relation of individual differences in personality to one's preferences for approaching and managing conflict in work settings. This investigation offers a conceptual foundation for relating the Five-Factor Model (FFM) of personality to strategy preference, tests strategy-FFM dimension hypotheses, and explores strategy relations with narrower FFM midlevel traits. Managers and supervisors (N = 249) from public, governmental, and private sector organizations completed the Organizational Communication and Conflict Instrument and the Revised NEO Personality Inventory. Preferences for conflict strategies were found to relate to distinct patterns of FFM dimensions, while narrower midlevel traits provided meaningful insights into the nature of the observed relations.
引用
收藏
页码:47 / 68
页数:22
相关论文
共 68 条
[1]  
Ajzen I., 1988, Attitudes, personality, and behavior
[2]  
Ajzen I, 1985, ACTION CONTROL COGNI, P11, DOI DOI 10.1007/978-3-642-69746-3_2
[3]   Relationship between the big five personality factors and conflict management styles [J].
Antonioni, D .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CONFLICT MANAGEMENT, 1998, 9 (04) :336-355
[5]   PERSONALITY-CORRELATES OF CONFLICT RESOLUTION MODES [J].
BELL, EC ;
BLAKENEY, RN .
HUMAN RELATIONS, 1977, 30 (09) :849-857
[6]  
Blake R.R., 1964, MANAGERIAL GRID
[7]  
CHANIN MN, 1984, HUM RELAT, V10, P863
[8]  
Cohen J., 1983, APPL MULTIPLE REGRES, DOI [10.1002/0471264385.wei0219, DOI 10.1002/0471264385.WEI0219]
[9]  
Costa P. T., 1992, PROFESSIONAL MANUAL
[10]  
Fetscherin M, 2008, J ELECTRON COMMER RE, V9, P231