Experimental methods in studying child language acquisition

被引:44
作者
Ambridge, Ben [1 ]
Rowland, Caroline F. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Liverpool, Inst Psychol Hlth & Soc, Liverpool L69 3BX, Merseyside, England
关键词
ENGLISH PAST-TENSE; STRUCTURE OVERGENERALIZATION ERRORS; AGREEMENT/TENSE OMISSION MODEL; ARGUMENT-STRUCTURE; WORD-ORDER; RELATIVE CLAUSES; ELICITED IMITATION; YOUNG-CHILDREN; WH-QUESTIONS; TRANSITIVE CONSTRUCTION;
D O I
10.1002/wcs.1215
中图分类号
B84 [心理学];
学科分类号
04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
This article reviews the some of the most widely used methods used for studying children's language acquisition including (1) spontaneous/naturalistic, diary, parental report data, (2) production methods (elicited production, repetition/elicited imitation, syntactic priming/weird word order), (3) comprehension methods (act-out, pointing, intermodal preferential looking, looking while listening, conditioned head turn preference procedure, functional neuroimaging) and (4) judgment methods (grammaticality/acceptability judgments, yes-no/truth-value judgments). The review outlines the types of studies and age-groups to which each method is most suited, as well as the advantage and disadvantages of each. We conclude by summarising the particular methodological considerations that apply to each paradigm and to experimental design more generally. These include (1) choosing an age-appropriate task that makes communicative sense (2) motivating children to co-operate, (3) choosing a between-/within-subjects design, (4) the use of novel items (e.g., novel verbs), (5) fillers, (6) blocked, counterbalanced and random presentation, (7) the appropriate number of trials and participants, (8) drop-out rates (9) the importance of control conditions, (10) choosing a sensitive dependent measure (11) classification of responses, and (12) using an appropriate statistical test. WIREs Cogn Sci 2013, 4:149168. doi: 10.1002/wcs.1215 For further resources related to this article, please visit the WIREs website. Conflict of interest: The authors declare no conflict of interest.
引用
收藏
页码:149 / 168
页数:20
相关论文
共 165 条
[1]   What preschool children do and do not do with ungrammatical word orders [J].
Abbot-Smith, K ;
Lieven, E ;
Tomasello, M .
COGNITIVE DEVELOPMENT, 2001, 16 (02) :679-692
[2]  
Aguado Orea J. J., 2004, THESIS U NOTTINGHAM
[3]   Acquiring basic word order: Evidence for data-driven learning of syntactic structure [J].
Akhtar, N .
JOURNAL OF CHILD LANGUAGE, 1999, 26 (02) :339-356
[4]   Young children's productivity with word order and verb morphology [J].
Akhtar, N ;
Tomasello, M .
DEVELOPMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY, 1997, 33 (06) :952-965
[5]   Rules vs. analogy in English past tenses: a computational/experimental study [J].
Albright, A ;
Hayes, B .
COGNITION, 2003, 90 (02) :119-161
[6]  
Ambridge B., 2011, Guide to Research Methods in Child Language, P113
[7]  
AMBRIDGE B, COGN SCI IN PRESS
[8]  
Ambridge B., 2011, CHILD LANGUAGE ACQUS
[9]  
AMBRIDGE B, PASSIVE RESIST UNPUB
[10]   Is structure dependence an innate constraint? New experimental evidence from children's complex-question production [J].
Ambridge, Ben ;
Rowland, Caroline F. ;
Pine, Julian M. .
COGNITIVE SCIENCE, 2008, 32 (01) :222-255