A technique for quantifying the sensitivity of dosimetric tool gamma with 2D detector array in pretreatment IMRT plans by segment deletion method

被引:2
作者
Krishnan, M. P. Arun [1 ,2 ]
Bhagyalakshmi, A. T. [1 ]
Holla, Raghavendra [3 ]
Puzakkal, Niyas [2 ]
Ranjith, C. P. [2 ]
Vysakh, R. [2 ]
Irfad, M. P. [2 ]
Ramasubramanian, V [1 ]
Hu, Jianping [1 ]
Momeen, M. Ummal [1 ]
机构
[1] Vellore Inst Technol, Sch Adv Sci, Vellore 632014, Tamil Nadu, India
[2] MVR Canc Ctr & Res Inst, Kozhikode 673601, India
[3] Amrita Inst Med Sci & Res Ctr, Kochi 682041, Kerala, India
来源
RADIOLOGIA MEDICA | 2021年 / 126卷 / 03期
关键词
IMRT; Pretreatment quality assurance; Decrement factor; Gamma; Error identification; Passing criterion; Region of interest; QUALITY-ASSURANCE; FILM DOSIMETRY; QUANTITATIVE-EVALUATION; VERIFICATION;
D O I
10.1007/s11547-020-01259-y
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
Objectives Motivation of this study is to check the sensitivity of dosimetric tool gamma with 2D detector array combination when unexpected errors occur while transferring intensity-modulated radiation therapy treatment plans from planning system to treatment unit. Methods This study consists of 17 head and neck cancer patient's treatment plans. Nine types of verification plans are created for all 17 clinically approved treatment plans by consecutively deleting different segments (up to eight) one by one from each field of the plan. Decrement factor (chi) is introduced in our study which illustrated the degree of decay of gamma passing rate when intentional errors are introduced. We analyzed the data by two different methods-one without selecting the region of interest (ROI) in dose distributions and the other by selecting the region of interest. Results By linear regression, the absolute value of slopes is 0.025, 0.024 and 0.015 without ROI and 0.030, 0.027 and 0.015 with ROI for 2%/2 mm, 3%/3 mm and 5%/5 mm criteria, respectively. The higher absolute value of the fitted slope indicates the higher sensitivity of this method to identify erroneous plan in treatment unit. The threshold value for 2%/2 mm equivalent to 95% passing criteria in 3%/3 mm used in clinical practice is obtained as 83.44%. Conclusions The 2D detector array with dosimetric tool gamma is less sensitive in detecting errors when unprecedented errors of segment deletion occur within the treatment plans.
引用
收藏
页码:453 / 459
页数:7
相关论文
共 27 条
[1]   Characterization of a 2D ionization chamber array for IMRT plan verification [J].
Alashrah, S. ;
Kandaiya, S. ;
Yong, S. Y. ;
Cheng, S. K. .
NUCLEAR INSTRUMENTS & METHODS IN PHYSICS RESEARCH SECTION A-ACCELERATORS SPECTROMETERS DETECTORS AND ASSOCIATED EQUIPMENT, 2010, 619 (1-3) :181-185
[2]   EPID dosimetry for pretreatment quality assurance with two commercial systems [J].
Bailey, Daniel W. ;
Kumaraswamy, Lalith ;
Bakhtiari, Mohammad ;
Malhotra, Harish K. ;
Podgorsak, Matthew B. .
JOURNAL OF APPLIED CLINICAL MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2012, 13 (04) :82-99
[3]  
Bogdanich W., 2014, The New York Times
[4]  
Bramoulle C, 2017, PHYS MEDICA, V44, P28
[5]   An intercomparison between film dosimetry and diode matrix for IMRT quality assurance [J].
Buonamici, F. Banci ;
Compagnucci, A. ;
Marrazzo, L. ;
Russo, S. ;
Bucciolini, M. .
MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2007, 34 (04) :1372-1379
[6]   2D EPID dose calibration for pretreatment quality control of conformal and IMRT fields: A simple and fast convolution approach [J].
Camilleri, Jeremy ;
Mazurier, Jocelyne ;
Franck, Denis ;
Dudouet, Philippe ;
Latorzeff, Igor ;
Franceries, Xavier .
PHYSICA MEDICA-EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2016, 32 (01) :133-140
[7]   Comparison of four commercial devices for RapidArc and sliding window IMRT QA [J].
Chandraraj, Varatharaj ;
Stathakis, Sotirios ;
Manickam, Ravikumar ;
Esquivel, Carlos ;
Supe, Sanjay S. ;
Papanikolaou, Nikos .
JOURNAL OF APPLIED CLINICAL MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2011, 12 (02) :338-349
[8]   The design and testing of novel clinical parameters for dose comparison [J].
Childress, NL ;
Rosen, II .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2003, 56 (05) :1464-1479
[9]   Statistical analysis of IMRT dosimetry quality assurance measurements for local delivery guideline [J].
Chung, Jin Beom ;
Kim, Jae Sung ;
Ha, Sung Whan ;
Ye, Sung-Joon .
RADIATION ONCOLOGY, 2011, 6
[10]   A quantitative evaluation of IMRT dose distributions: refinement and clinical assessment of the gamma evaluation [J].
Depuydt, T ;
Van Esch, A ;
Huyskens, DP .
RADIOTHERAPY AND ONCOLOGY, 2002, 62 (03) :309-319