Surface flux evolution constraints for flux transport dynamos

被引:37
作者
Cameron, R. H. [1 ]
Schmitt, D. [1 ]
Jiang, J. [2 ]
Isik, E. [3 ]
机构
[1] Max Planck Inst Sonnensyst Forsch, D-37191 Katlenburg Lindau, Germany
[2] Chinese Acad Sci, Key Lab Solar Act, Natl Astron Observ, Beijing 100012, Peoples R China
[3] Istanbul Kultur Univ, Dept Phys, Fac Sci & Letters, TR-34156 Istanbul, Turkey
关键词
dynamo; Sun: activity; DIFFERENTIAL ROTATION; SOLAR OSCILLATIONS; MERIDIONAL FLOW; MAGNETIC-FLUX; TILT ANGLES; FIELD; MODELS;
D O I
10.1051/0004-6361/201218906
中图分类号
P1 [天文学];
学科分类号
0704 ;
摘要
The surface flux transport (SFT) model of solar magnetic fields involves empirically well-constrained velocity and magnetic fields. The basic evolution of the Sun's large-scale surface magnetic field is well described by this model. The azimuthally averaged evolution of the SFT model can be compared to the surface evolution of the flux transport dynamo (FTD), and the evolution of the SFT model can be used to constrain several near-surface properties of the FTD model. We compared the results of the FTD model with different upper boundary conditions and diffusivity profiles against the results of the SFT model. Among the ingredients of the FTD model, downward pumping of magnetic flux, related to a positive diffusivity gradient, has a significant effect in slowing down the diffusive radial transport of magnetic flux through the solar surface. Provided the pumping was strong enough to give rise to a downflow of a magnetic Reynolds number of 5 in the near-surface boundary layer, the FTD using a vertical boundary condition matches the SFT model based on the average velocities above the boundary layer. The FTD model with a potential field was unable to match the SFT results.
引用
收藏
页数:7
相关论文
共 36 条
[1]   CHARACTERISTICS OF SOLAR MERIDIONAL FLOWS DURING SOLAR CYCLE 23 [J].
Basu, Sarbani ;
Antia, H. M. .
ASTROPHYSICAL JOURNAL, 2010, 717 (01) :488-495
[2]   A necessary extension of the surface flux transport model [J].
Baumann, I ;
Schmitt, D ;
Schüssler, M .
ASTRONOMY & ASTROPHYSICS, 2006, 446 (01) :307-314
[3]   A comparison of differential rotation measurements (Invited Review) [J].
Beck, JG .
SOLAR PHYSICS, 2000, 191 (01) :47-70
[4]   A two-dimensional asymptotic solution for a dynamo wave in the light of the solar internal rotation [J].
Belvedere, G ;
Kuzanyan, KM ;
Sokoloff, D .
MONTHLY NOTICES OF THE ROYAL ASTRONOMICAL SOCIETY, 2000, 315 (04) :778-790
[5]  
BRANDENBURG A, 1992, ASTR SOC P, V27, P536
[6]   Solar cycle prediction using precursors and flux transport models [J].
Cameron, R. ;
Schuessler, M. .
ASTROPHYSICAL JOURNAL, 2007, 659 (01) :801-811
[7]   SURFACE FLUX TRANSPORT MODELING FOR SOLAR CYCLES 15-21: EFFECTS OF CYCLE-DEPENDENT TILT ANGLES OF SUNSPOT GROUPS [J].
Cameron, R. H. ;
Jiang, J. ;
Schmitt, D. ;
Schuessler, M. .
ASTROPHYSICAL JOURNAL, 2010, 719 (01) :264-270
[8]   Dynamo Models of the Solar Cycle [J].
Charbonneau, Paul .
LIVING REVIEWS IN SOLAR PHYSICS, 2010, 7 (03)
[9]   Sunspot group tilt angles and the strength of the solar cycle [J].
Dasi-Espuig, M. ;
Solanki, S. K. ;
Krivova, N. A. ;
Cameron, R. ;
Penuela, T. .
ASTRONOMY & ASTROPHYSICS, 2010, 518
[10]   A Babcock-Leighton flux transport dynamo with solar-like differential rotation [J].
Dikpati, M ;
Charbonneau, P .
ASTROPHYSICAL JOURNAL, 1999, 518 (01) :508-520