The preventive effect of glass ionomer restorations on new caries formation: A systematic review and meta-analysis

被引:26
作者
Ge, Kelsey Xingyun [1 ]
Quock, Ryan [1 ,2 ]
Chu, Chun-Hung [1 ]
Yu, Ollie Yiru [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Hong Kong, Fac Dent, 34 Hosp Rd, Hong Kong, Peoples R China
[2] Univ Texas Hlth Sci Ctr Houston, Sch Dent, Dept Restorat Dent & Prosthodont, Houston, TX USA
关键词
Glass ionomer cement; Resin-modified glass ionomer cement; Caries prevention; Fluoride; Systematic review; EARLY-CHILDHOOD CARIES; FLUORIDE RELEASE; COMPOSITE RESIN; AMALGAM RESTORATIONS; PRIMARY TEETH; CEMENT; LESIONS; ADJACENT; REMINERALIZATION; ADHESIVE;
D O I
10.1016/j.jdent.2022.104272
中图分类号
R78 [口腔科学];
学科分类号
1003 ;
摘要
Objective: To investigate the effectiveness of glass ionomer cement (GIC) restorations on preventing new caries in primary or permanent dentitions compared with other types of restorations. Data: Randomized controlled clinical trials evaluating caries experience increment or caries incidence in patients with GIC restorations, including conventional GIC (CGIC) and resin-modified GIC (RMGIC) restorations, were included. Sources: A systematic search of publications in English was conducted in PubMed/Medline, Web of Science, Cochrane, and Scopus databases. Study selection/results: This review included 10 studies reporting caries preventive effect of GIC restorations and selected 5 studies for meta-analysis. Patients with GIC restorations showed lower caries incidence compared with other restorations in primary and permanent dentition [RR=0.67, 95% CI:0.55-0.82, p < 0.0001]. Patients with CGIC restorations showed lower caries incidence compared with amalgam restorations [RR=0.57, 95% CI:0.43-0.76, p = 0.0001] and RMGIC restorations [RR=0.70, 95% CI:0.56-0.87, p = 0.002], but no statistical difference with composite resin restorations [RR=0.73, 95% CI:0.51-1.04, p = 0.08] in primary dentition. Patients with RMGIC restorations showed no statistical differences of caries incidence compared with composite resin restorations in primary and permanent dentition [RR=0.83, 95% CI:0.56-1.22, p = 0.33]. Conclusions: GIC restorations presented a better preventive effect on new caries than other restorations did in primary and permanent dentitions. CGIC restorations presented a better caries preventive effect on new caries than RMGIC and amalgam restorations in primary dentitions did. RMGIC restorations showed similar preventing effect on new caries with composite resin restorations in primary and permanent dentitions. Clinical significance: This review affirmed the potential of GIC in preventing new caries development in the dentition.
引用
收藏
页数:10
相关论文
共 47 条
[21]  
Liberati A, 2009, BMJ-BRIT MED J, V339, DOI [10.1016/j.ijsu.2010.02.007, 10.1371/journal.pmed.1000097, 10.1136/bmj.b2700, 10.1016/j.ijsu.2010.07.299, 10.1136/bmj.b2535, 10.1186/2046-4053-4-1, 10.1136/bmj.i4086]
[22]   Dental Glass Ionomer Cements as Permanent Filling Materials? -Properties, Limitations and Future Trends [J].
Lohbauer, Ulrich .
MATERIALS, 2010, 3 (01) :76-96
[23]  
Mickenautsch S, 2009, EUR J PAEDIATR DENT, V10, P41
[24]   FLUORIDE RELEASE FROM LIGHT-ACTIVATED GLASS-IONOMER RESTORATIVE CEMENTS [J].
MOMOI, Y ;
MCCABE, JF .
DENTAL MATERIALS, 1993, 9 (03) :151-154
[25]  
Mount G.J., 2001, An atlas of glass-ionomer cements: a clinician's guide, DOI 10.3109/9780203215456
[26]   Silver diamine fluoride and glass ionomer differentially remineralize early caries lesions, in situ [J].
Nantanee, Ratichanok ;
Santiwong, Busayarat ;
Trairatvorakul, Chutima ;
Hamba, Hidenori ;
Tagami, Junji .
CLINICAL ORAL INVESTIGATIONS, 2016, 20 (06) :1151-1157
[27]   Lack of Buffering by Composites Promotes Shift to More Cariogenic Bacteria [J].
Nedeljkovic, I. ;
De Munck, J. ;
Slomka, V. ;
Van Meerbeek, B. ;
Teughels, W. ;
Van Landuyt, K. L. .
JOURNAL OF DENTAL RESEARCH, 2016, 95 (08) :875-881
[28]  
Petersen PE, 2005, B WORLD HEALTH ORGAN, V83, P661
[29]   Resin-modified and conventional glass ionomer restorations in primary teeth: 8-year results [J].
Qvist, V ;
Manscher, E ;
Teglers, PT .
JOURNAL OF DENTISTRY, 2004, 32 (04) :285-294
[30]   Eight-year study on conventional glass ionomer and amalgam restorations in primary teeth [J].
Qvist, V ;
Laurberg, L ;
Poulsen, A ;
Teglers, PT .
ACTA ODONTOLOGICA SCANDINAVICA, 2004, 62 (01) :37-45