An examination of dissertation research: The relationship between gender, methodological approach, and research design

被引:10
作者
Diaz-Kope, Luisa M. [1 ]
Miller-Stevens, Katrina [2 ]
Henley, Tiffany J. [3 ]
机构
[1] Univ North Georgia, Dept Polit Sci & Int Affairs, Dahlonega, GA USA
[2] Colorado Coll, Dept Econ & Business, 14 E Cache Poudre St, Colorado Springs, CO 80903 USA
[3] Pace Univ, Dyson Coll Arts & Sci, Dept Publ Adm, New York, NY 10038 USA
关键词
Dissertation trends; gender; methodology; research design; PROGRAMS; FEMINISM; DEBATE; WOMEN;
D O I
10.1080/15236803.2018.1463792
中图分类号
G40 [教育学];
学科分类号
040101 ; 120403 ;
摘要
In the fields of public administration, policy, and public affairs, more women are earning PhD degrees and entering male-dominated academic and public sector job markets. This trend raises questions about the future of dissertation research and implications of gender on methodological approach and research design. This study examines the state of dissertation methods and research design in public administration, policy, and public affairs doctoral programs through the lens of gender between the years 2010 and 2014. A total of 986 dissertations are reviewed from PhD programs housed in universities that have NASPAA accredited MPA programs. Chi-square tests of independence and multinomial logistic regression illustrate that choice of methodological approach is not independent of gender, but rather there is a significant association between the two, and choice of research design also impacts methodological approach. Descriptive statistics show an increased trend in females using quantitative approaches to dissertation research.
引用
收藏
页码:93 / 114
页数:22
相关论文
共 51 条
[1]   DISSERTATION RESEARCH IN PUBLIC-ADMINISTRATION AND COGNATE FIELDS - AN ASSESSMENT OF METHODS AND QUALITY [J].
ADAMS, GB ;
WHITE, JD .
PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION REVIEW, 1994, 54 (06) :565-576
[2]  
Allum J.R., 2014, GRADUATE ENROLLMENT
[3]  
American Psychological Association, 2015, Definitions related to sexual orientation and gender diversity in APA documents
[4]  
Anderson Elizabeth., 1995, HYPATIA, V10, P50, DOI [10.1111/j.1527-2001.1995.tb00737.x, DOI 10.1111/J.1527-2001.1995.TB00737.X]
[5]  
[Anonymous], 2014 2015 ROST ACCR
[6]  
[Anonymous], 1985, Reflections on gender and science
[7]  
[Anonymous], 1987, The Science Question in Feminism
[8]  
Bennett A, 2003, PS-POLIT SCI POLIT, V36, P373
[10]  
Brewer G.A., 1998, J PUBLIC AFF EDUC, V4, P123, DOI DOI 10.1080/15236803.1998.12022018