Risk Factors for Brucella Seroprevalence in Peri-Urban Dairy Farms in Five Indian Cities

被引:14
作者
Lindahl, Johanna F. [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Gill, Jatinder Paul Singh [4 ]
Hazarika, Razibuddin Ahmed [5 ]
Fairoze, Nadeem Mohamed [6 ]
Bedi, Jasbir S. [4 ]
Dohoo, Ian [7 ]
Chauhan, Abhimanyu Singh [8 ,9 ]
Grace, Delia [1 ]
Kakkar, Manish [8 ]
机构
[1] Int Livestock Res Inst, Dept Biosci, Nairobi 00100, Kenya
[2] Swedish Univ Agr Sci, Dept Clin Sci, POB 7054, SE-75007 Uppsala, Sweden
[3] Uppsala Univ, Dept Med Biochem & Microbiol, Zoonosis Sci Ctr, POB 582, SE-75123 Uppsala, Sweden
[4] Guru Angad Dev Vet & Anim Sci Univ, Ludhiana 141004, Punjab, India
[5] Assam Agr Univ, Dept Vet Publ Hlth, Khanapara Campus, Gauhati 781022, India
[6] Karnataka Vet Anim & Fisheries Sci Univ Bangalore, Vet Coll, Dept LPT, Bangalore 560024, Karnataka, India
[7] Univ Prince Edward Isl, Atlantic Vet Coll, Charlottetown, PE C1A 4P3, Canada
[8] Publ Hlth Fdn India, Gurgaon 122002, India
[9] Univ Liege, Fac Med, Dept Publ Hlth Sci, B-4000 Liege, Belgium
关键词
zoonoses; prevalence; Brucella abortus; urban livestock keeping; smallholder farming; BOVINE BRUCELLOSIS; EPIDEMIOLOGY; PREVALENCE; DIAGNOSIS; VACCINATION; LIVESTOCK; ADOPTION; CATTLE; IMPACT; ASSAM;
D O I
10.3390/tropicalmed4020070
中图分类号
R51 [传染病];
学科分类号
100401 ;
摘要
Brucellosis is endemic among dairy animals in India, contributing to production losses and posing a health risk to people, especially farmers and others in close contact with dairy animals or their products. Growing urban populations demand increased milk supplies, resulting in intensifying dairy production at the peri-urban fringe. Peri-urban dairying is under-studied but has implications for disease transmission, both positive and negative. In this cross-sectional study, five Indian cities were selected to represent different geographies and urbanization extent. Around each, we randomly selected 34 peri-urban villages, and in each village three smallholder dairy farms (defined as having a maximum of 10 dairy animals) were randomly selected. The farmers were interviewed, and milk samples were taken from up to three animals. These were tested using a commercial ELISA for antibodies against Brucella abortus, and factors associated with herd seroprevalence were identified. In all, 164 out of 1163 cows (14.1%, 95% CI 12.2-16.2%) were seropositive for Brucella. In total, 91 out of 510 farms (17.8%, 95% CI 14.6-21.4%) had at least one positive animal, and out of these, just seven farmers stated that they had vaccinated against brucellosis. In four cities, the farm-level seroprevalence ranged between 1.4-5.2%, while the fifth city had a seroprevalence of 72.5%. This city had larger, zero-grazing herds, used artificial insemination to a much higher degree, replaced their animals by purchasing from their neighbors, were less likely to contact a veterinarian in case of sick animals, and were also judged to be less clean. Within the high-prevalence city, farms were at higher risk of being infected if they had a young owner and if they were judged less clean. In the low-prevalence cities, no risk factors could be identified. In conclusion, this study has identified that a city can have a high burden of infected animals in the peri-urban areas, but that seroprevalence is strongly influenced by the husbandry system. Increased intensification can be associated with increased risk, and thus the practices associated with this, such as artificial insemination, are also associated with increased risk. These results may be important to identify high-risk areas for prioritizing interventions and for policy decisions influencing the structure and development of the dairy industry.
引用
收藏
页数:12
相关论文
共 34 条
[11]  
Gall D, 2004, REV SCI TECH OIE, V23, P989
[12]  
Gill J, 2000, P 9 INT S VET EP EC
[13]   Diagnosis of Brucellosis in Livestock and Wildlife [J].
Godfroid, Jacques ;
Nielsen, Klaus ;
Saegerman, Claude .
CROATIAN MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2010, 51 (04) :296-305
[14]  
Gogoi SB., 2017, J ENTOMOL ZOOL STUD, V5, P179
[15]   Poor livestock keepers: ecosystem - poverty - health interactions [J].
Grace, Delia ;
Lindahl, Johanna ;
Wanyoike, Francis ;
Bett, Bernard ;
Randolph, Tom ;
Rich, Karl M. .
PHILOSOPHICAL TRANSACTIONS OF THE ROYAL SOCIETY B-BIOLOGICAL SCIENCES, 2017, 372 (1725)
[16]   CASTE, LIVELIHOODS AND LIVESTOCK: AN EXPLORATION OF THE UPTAKE OF LIVESTOCK VACCINATION ADOPTION AMONG POOR FARMERS IN INDIA [J].
Heffernan, Claire ;
Thomson, Kim ;
Nielsen, Louise .
JOURNAL OF INTERNATIONAL DEVELOPMENT, 2011, 23 (01) :103-118
[17]  
Hussain S.A., 2000, COMP MICROBIOL IMMUN, V21, P165
[18]   Brucellosis in India: results of a collaborative workshop to define One Health priorities [J].
Lindahl, Johanna F. ;
Vrentas, Catherine E. ;
Deka, Ram P. ;
Hazarika, Razibuddin A. ;
Rahman, H. ;
Bambal, R. G. ;
Bedi, J. S. ;
Bhattacharya, C. ;
Chaduhuri, Pallab ;
Fairoze, Nadeem Mohamed ;
Gandhi, R. S. ;
Gill, J. P. S. ;
Gupta, N. K. ;
Kumar, M. ;
Londhe, S. ;
Rahi, M. ;
Sharma, P. K. ;
Shome, R. ;
Singh, R. ;
Srinivas, K. ;
Swain, B. B. .
TROPICAL ANIMAL HEALTH AND PRODUCTION, 2020, 52 (01) :387-396
[19]   Do vaccination interventions have effects? A study on how poultry vaccination interventions change smallholder farmer knowledge, attitudes, and practice in villages in Kenya and Tanzania [J].
Lindahl, Johanna F. ;
Young, Jarrah ;
Wyatt, Amanda ;
Young, Mary ;
Alders, Robyn ;
Bagnol, Brigitte ;
Kibaya, Augustino ;
Grace, Delia .
TROPICAL ANIMAL HEALTH AND PRODUCTION, 2019, 51 (01) :213-220
[20]   An inclusive and participatory approach to changing policies and practices for improved milk safety in Assam, northeast India [J].
Lindahl, Johanna F. ;
Deka, Ram Pratim ;
Melin, David ;
Berg, Anna ;
Lunden, Hanna ;
Lapar, M. Lucila ;
Asse, Rainer ;
Grace, Delia .
GLOBAL FOOD SECURITY-AGRICULTURE POLICY ECONOMICS AND ENVIRONMENT, 2018, 17 :9-13