Risk Factors for Brucella Seroprevalence in Peri-Urban Dairy Farms in Five Indian Cities

被引:14
作者
Lindahl, Johanna F. [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Gill, Jatinder Paul Singh [4 ]
Hazarika, Razibuddin Ahmed [5 ]
Fairoze, Nadeem Mohamed [6 ]
Bedi, Jasbir S. [4 ]
Dohoo, Ian [7 ]
Chauhan, Abhimanyu Singh [8 ,9 ]
Grace, Delia [1 ]
Kakkar, Manish [8 ]
机构
[1] Int Livestock Res Inst, Dept Biosci, Nairobi 00100, Kenya
[2] Swedish Univ Agr Sci, Dept Clin Sci, POB 7054, SE-75007 Uppsala, Sweden
[3] Uppsala Univ, Dept Med Biochem & Microbiol, Zoonosis Sci Ctr, POB 582, SE-75123 Uppsala, Sweden
[4] Guru Angad Dev Vet & Anim Sci Univ, Ludhiana 141004, Punjab, India
[5] Assam Agr Univ, Dept Vet Publ Hlth, Khanapara Campus, Gauhati 781022, India
[6] Karnataka Vet Anim & Fisheries Sci Univ Bangalore, Vet Coll, Dept LPT, Bangalore 560024, Karnataka, India
[7] Univ Prince Edward Isl, Atlantic Vet Coll, Charlottetown, PE C1A 4P3, Canada
[8] Publ Hlth Fdn India, Gurgaon 122002, India
[9] Univ Liege, Fac Med, Dept Publ Hlth Sci, B-4000 Liege, Belgium
关键词
zoonoses; prevalence; Brucella abortus; urban livestock keeping; smallholder farming; BOVINE BRUCELLOSIS; EPIDEMIOLOGY; PREVALENCE; DIAGNOSIS; VACCINATION; LIVESTOCK; ADOPTION; CATTLE; IMPACT; ASSAM;
D O I
10.3390/tropicalmed4020070
中图分类号
R51 [传染病];
学科分类号
100401 ;
摘要
Brucellosis is endemic among dairy animals in India, contributing to production losses and posing a health risk to people, especially farmers and others in close contact with dairy animals or their products. Growing urban populations demand increased milk supplies, resulting in intensifying dairy production at the peri-urban fringe. Peri-urban dairying is under-studied but has implications for disease transmission, both positive and negative. In this cross-sectional study, five Indian cities were selected to represent different geographies and urbanization extent. Around each, we randomly selected 34 peri-urban villages, and in each village three smallholder dairy farms (defined as having a maximum of 10 dairy animals) were randomly selected. The farmers were interviewed, and milk samples were taken from up to three animals. These were tested using a commercial ELISA for antibodies against Brucella abortus, and factors associated with herd seroprevalence were identified. In all, 164 out of 1163 cows (14.1%, 95% CI 12.2-16.2%) were seropositive for Brucella. In total, 91 out of 510 farms (17.8%, 95% CI 14.6-21.4%) had at least one positive animal, and out of these, just seven farmers stated that they had vaccinated against brucellosis. In four cities, the farm-level seroprevalence ranged between 1.4-5.2%, while the fifth city had a seroprevalence of 72.5%. This city had larger, zero-grazing herds, used artificial insemination to a much higher degree, replaced their animals by purchasing from their neighbors, were less likely to contact a veterinarian in case of sick animals, and were also judged to be less clean. Within the high-prevalence city, farms were at higher risk of being infected if they had a young owner and if they were judged less clean. In the low-prevalence cities, no risk factors could be identified. In conclusion, this study has identified that a city can have a high burden of infected animals in the peri-urban areas, but that seroprevalence is strongly influenced by the husbandry system. Increased intensification can be associated with increased risk, and thus the practices associated with this, such as artificial insemination, are also associated with increased risk. These results may be important to identify high-risk areas for prioritizing interventions and for policy decisions influencing the structure and development of the dairy industry.
引用
收藏
页数:12
相关论文
共 34 条
[1]   A study on the epidemiology of bovine brucellosis in Punjab (India) using milk-ELISA [J].
Aulakh, H. K. ;
Patil, P. K. ;
Sharma, S. ;
Kumar, H. ;
Mahajan, V. ;
Sandhu, K. S. .
ACTA VETERINARIA BRNO, 2008, 77 (03) :393-399
[2]   Adoption of dairy production technologies and implications for dairy development in India [J].
Basunathe, V. K. ;
Sawarkar, S. W. ;
Sasidhar, P. V. K. .
OUTLOOK ON AGRICULTURE, 2010, 39 (02) :134-140
[3]  
Chakraborty M, 2000, INDIAN VET J, V77, P849
[4]  
Corbel M.J., 2006, WHO FAO OIE BRUCELLO
[5]   Poor performance of the rapid test for human brucellosis in health facilities in Kenya [J].
de Glanville, William A. ;
Conde-Alvarez, Raquel ;
Moriyon, Ignacio ;
Njeru, John ;
Diaz, Ramon ;
Cook, Elizabeth A. J. ;
Morin, Matilda ;
Bronsvoort, Barend M. de C. ;
Thomas, Lian F. ;
Kariuki, Samuel ;
Fevre, Eric M. .
PLOS NEGLECTED TROPICAL DISEASES, 2017, 11 (04)
[6]  
Deka R. P., 2018, Infection Ecology & Epidemiology, V8, P1556548, DOI 10.1080/20008686.2018.1556548
[7]   Rising consumption of meat and milk in developing countries has created a new food revolution [J].
Delgado, CL .
JOURNAL OF NUTRITION, 2003, 133 (11) :3907S-3910S
[8]   A study of the epidemiology of brucellosis in Punjab (India) using Survey Toolbox [J].
Dhand, NK ;
Gumber, S ;
Singh, BB ;
Aradhana ;
Bal, MS ;
Kumar, H ;
Sharma, DR ;
Singh, J ;
Sandhu, KS .
REVUE SCIENTIFIQUE ET TECHNIQUE-OFFICE INTERNATIONAL DES EPIZOOTIES, 2005, 24 (03) :879-885
[9]   The Dairy Industry: A Brief Description of Production Practices, Trends, and Farm Characteristics Around the World [J].
Douphrate, David I. ;
Hagevoort, G. Robert ;
Nonnenmann, Matthew W. ;
Kolstrup, Christina Lunner ;
Reynolds, Stephen J. ;
Jakob, Martina ;
Kinsel, Mark .
JOURNAL OF AGROMEDICINE, 2013, 18 (03) :187-197
[10]   The Dutch Brucella abortus monitoring programme for cattle:: the impact of false-positive serological reactions and comparison of serological tests [J].
Emmerzaal, A ;
de Wit, JJ ;
Dijkstra, T ;
Bakker, D ;
van Ziiderveld, FG .
VETERINARY QUARTERLY, 2002, 24 (01) :40-46