Assessment of anodized titanium implants bioactivity

被引:25
作者
El-wassefy, Noha A. [1 ]
Hammouda, Ibrahim M. [2 ]
Habib, Ahmed Nour El-deen A. [3 ]
El-awady, Ghada Y. [4 ]
Marzook, Hamdy A. [5 ]
机构
[1] Mansoura Univ, Fac Dent, Dept Dent Biomat, Zagazig, Sharkia, Egypt
[2] Umm Al Qura Univ, Fac Dent, Dept Restorat Dent, Mecca, Saudi Arabia
[3] Cairo Univ, Fac Oral & Dent Med, Dept Dent Biomat, Giza, Egypt
[4] Mansoura Univ, Fac Sci, Dept Chem, Mansoura, Egypt
[5] Mansoura Univ, Fac Dent, Dept Oral Surg, Mansoura, Egypt
关键词
anodic oxidation; commercially pure titanium; crystalline structure; morphology; push-out test; roughness; standard histological evaluation; surface elemental analysis; SURFACE-PROPERTIES; OXIDE THICKNESS; PURE TITANIUM; BONE; OXIDATION; ROUGHNESS; ALLOYS; FILMS; METAL; SBF;
D O I
10.1111/clr.12031
中图分类号
R78 [口腔科学];
学科分类号
1003 ;
摘要
ObjectivesThis study was conducted to create nanostructured surface titanium implants by anodic oxidation process aiming to bring out bioactivity and to assess the resultant bioactivity both in vitro and in vivo. Materials and MethodsAn economic protocol was used to apply anodic spark discharge and create surface nanoporosities on grade II commercially pure titanium (cpTi). The in vitro investigation included morphology, surface chemical analysis, roughness and crystalline structure of titanium oxide (TiO2) film prepared. Assessment of the bioactivity was carried out by immersing the specimens in simulate body fluid (SBF) and investigating the surface-deposited layer. The in vivo investigation was conducted by surgically placing the anodized implants into rabbits tibia for different healing periods. Then biomechanical evaluation was performed to verify the effect of treatments on the interface resistance to shear force. Routine histological analysis was performed to evaluate the bone tissue reactions to anodized implants. ResultsAnodization of titanium implants produced morphological changes, raised the percentage of oxygen in the TiO2 layer, increased surface area and roughness of implants remarkably, and modified the crystallinity of the film. The in vitro assessments of bioactivity showed that a layer of calcium phosphate was precipitated on the titanium surfaces 7days after soaking into SBF. The implant-bone interface resistance to shear force was enhanced at 2-week healing period. This was confirmed by histological findings. ConclusionNanostructured surface titanium implants could be prepared by anodic oxidation with resultant accelerated bioactivity that may be recommended for early loading.
引用
收藏
页码:E1 / E9
页数:9
相关论文
共 30 条
[1]   Hydroxyapatite-electroplated cp-titanium implant and its bone integration potentiality:: An in vivo study [J].
Badr, Nadia A. ;
El Hadary, Amany A. .
IMPLANT DENTISTRY, 2007, 16 (03) :297-304
[2]  
Bhaskar S. N., 1999, ORBANS ORAL HISTOLOG, P239
[3]   Can bioactivity be tested in vitro with SBF solution? [J].
Bohner, Marc ;
Lemaitre, Jacques .
BIOMATERIALS, 2009, 30 (12) :2175-2179
[4]   Preparation of bioactive titania films on titanium metal via anodic oxidation [J].
Cui, X. ;
Kim, H. -M. ;
Kawashita, M. ;
Wang, L. ;
Xiong, T. ;
Kokubo, T. ;
Nakamura, T. .
DENTAL MATERIALS, 2009, 25 (01) :80-86
[5]   Bioactivity assessment of titanium sheets electrochemically coated with thick oxide film [J].
de Sena, LA ;
Rocha, NCC ;
Andrade, MC ;
Soares, GA .
SURFACE & COATINGS TECHNOLOGY, 2003, 166 (2-3) :254-258
[6]   Physiological strains induce differentiation in human osteoblasts cultured on orthopaedic biomaterial [J].
Di Palma, F ;
Douet, M ;
Boachon, C ;
Guignandon, A ;
Peyroche, S ;
Forest, B ;
Alexandre, C ;
Chamson, A ;
Rattner, A .
BIOMATERIALS, 2003, 24 (18) :3139-3151
[7]   Growth of bioactive surfaces on titanium and its alloys for orthopaedic and dental implants [J].
Gil, FJ ;
Padrós, A ;
Manero, JM ;
Aparicio, C ;
Nilsson, M ;
Planell, JA .
MATERIALS SCIENCE & ENGINEERING C-BIOMIMETIC AND SUPRAMOLECULAR SYSTEMS, 2002, 22 (01) :53-60
[8]  
GILBERT JL, 1995, J DENT RES, V74, P92
[9]  
Gupta A., 2009, INTERNET J DENT SCI, V7, P10
[10]  
Huang Y. H., 2002, CLIN ORAL IMPLAN RES, V16, P105