Causal Reasoning Methods in Medical Domain: A Review

被引:1
作者
Wu, Xing [1 ,2 ]
Li, Jingwen [1 ]
Qian, Quan [1 ,3 ]
Liu, Yue [1 ,2 ]
Guo, Yike [4 ]
机构
[1] Shanghai Univ, Sch Comp Engn & Sci, Shanghai 20444, Peoples R China
[2] Shanghai Univ, Shanghai Inst Adv Commun & Data Sci, Shanghai 20444, Peoples R China
[3] Shanghai Univ, Mat Genome Inst, Shanghai 20444, Peoples R China
[4] Hong Kong Baptist Univ, Hong Kong, Peoples R China
来源
ADVANCES AND TRENDS IN ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE: THEORY AND PRACTICES IN ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE | 2022年 / 13343卷
基金
中国国家自然科学基金; 上海市自然科学基金;
关键词
Causality; Causal reasoning; Model-based reasoning; Causal effect estimation; Automated reasoning; MARGINAL STRUCTURAL MODELS; PROPENSITY SCORE METHODS; STATISTICAL-INFERENCE; DIAGRAMS;
D O I
10.1007/978-3-031-08530-7_16
中图分类号
TP18 [人工智能理论];
学科分类号
081104 ; 0812 ; 0835 ; 1405 ;
摘要
Causal reasoning has been a key topic in medical domain with many applications, in which the core problem is to infer the causal effects of medical treatments with data mining However, there are obstacles such as unstable identification and false associations when applying traditional machine learning methods dealing with the effect estimation about medical treatments due to the large-scale and high-dimensionality of medical data. Furthermore, there is no thorough survey of causal reasoning methods for medical domain problems, which is an emerging research direction. To meet the challenge, the causal reasoning in medical domain is surveyed to systematically classify and summarize causal reasoning methods in two dimensions: four categories of core ideas and three levels of causal structure. The thorough review demonstrates that causal reasoning methods have theoretical and practical significance in medical domain, which is a research field full of potential.
引用
收藏
页码:184 / 196
页数:13
相关论文
共 49 条
[1]  
Aliprantis D., 2015, A distinction between causal effects in structural and rubin causal models
[2]  
Athey S, 2018, Arxiv, DOI arXiv:1604.07125
[3]   An Introduction to Propensity Score Methods for Reducing the Effects of Confounding in Observational Studies [J].
Austin, Peter C. .
MULTIVARIATE BEHAVIORAL RESEARCH, 2011, 46 (03) :399-424
[4]   SemCaDo: A serendipitous strategy for causal discovery and ontology evolution [J].
Ben Messaoud, Montassar ;
Leray, Philippe ;
Ben Amor, Nahla .
KNOWLEDGE-BASED SYSTEMS, 2015, 76 :79-95
[5]   Propensity Score Methods for Confounding Control in Nonexperimental Research [J].
Brookhart, M. Alan ;
Wyss, Richard ;
Layton, J. Bradley ;
Stuerner, Til .
CIRCULATION-CARDIOVASCULAR QUALITY AND OUTCOMES, 2013, 6 (05) :604-611
[6]   A review and empirical comparison of causal inference methods for clustered observational data with application to the evaluation of the effectiveness of medical devices [J].
Cafri, Guy ;
Wang, Wei ;
Chan, Priscilla H. ;
Austin, Peter C. .
STATISTICAL METHODS IN MEDICAL RESEARCH, 2019, 28 (10-11) :3142-3162
[7]   Causal Inference Meets Machine Learning [J].
Cui, Peng ;
Shen, Zheyan ;
Li, Sheng ;
Yao, Liuyi ;
Li, Yaliang ;
Chu, Zhixuan ;
Gao, Jing .
KDD '20: PROCEEDINGS OF THE 26TH ACM SIGKDD INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON KNOWLEDGE DISCOVERY & DATA MINING, 2020, :3527-3528
[8]  
Dasgupta Ishita., 2019, arXiv
[9]   Learning causal Bayesian network structures from experimental data [J].
Ellis, Byron ;
Wong, Wing Hung .
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN STATISTICAL ASSOCIATION, 2008, 103 (482) :778-789
[10]  
Genewein T, 2020, Arxiv, DOI arXiv:2010.12237