Tutorial on logistic-regression calibration and fusion:converting a score to a likelihood ratio

被引:95
作者
Morrison, Geoffrey Stewart [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ New S Wales, Sch Elect Engn & Telecommun, Forens Voice Comparison Lab, Sydney, NSW 2052, Australia
基金
澳大利亚研究理事会;
关键词
logistic regression; calibration; fusion; likelihood ratio; score; forensic science; WEIGHT; FUSION;
D O I
10.1080/00450618.2012.733025
中图分类号
DF [法律]; D9 [法律]; R [医药、卫生];
学科分类号
0301 ; 10 ;
摘要
Logistic-regression calibration and fusion are potential steps in the calculation of forensic likelihood ratios. The present paper provides a tutorial on logistic-regression calibration and fusion at a practical conceptual level with minimal mathematical complexity. A score is log-likelihood-ratio like in that it indicates the degree of similarity of a pair of samples while taking into consideration their typicality with respect to a model of the relevant population. A higher-valued score provides more support for the same-origin hypothesis over the different-origin hypothesis than does a lower-valued score; however, the absolute values of scores are not interpretable as log likelihood ratios. Logistic-regression calibration is a procedure for converting scores to log likelihood ratios, and logistic-regression fusion is a procedure for converting parallel sets of scores from multiple forensic-comparison systems to log likelihood ratios. Logistic-regression calibration and fusion were developed for automatic speaker recognition and are popular in forensic voice comparison. They can also be applied in other branches of forensic science, a fingerprint/finger-mark example is provided.
引用
收藏
页码:173 / 197
页数:25
相关论文
共 40 条
[1]   Evaluation of trace evidence in the form of multivariate data (vol 53, pg 109, 2004) [J].
Aitken, CGG ;
Lucy, D .
JOURNAL OF THE ROYAL STATISTICAL SOCIETY SERIES C-APPLIED STATISTICS, 2004, 53 :665-666
[2]   Evaluation of trace evidence in the form of multivariate data [J].
Aitken, CGG ;
Lucy, D .
JOURNAL OF THE ROYAL STATISTICAL SOCIETY SERIES C-APPLIED STATISTICS, 2004, 53 :109-122
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2007, An introduction to categorical data analysis
[4]   Fusion of heterogeneous speaker recognition systems in the STBU submission for the NIST speaker recognition evaluation 2006 [J].
Bruemmer, Niko ;
Burget, Lukas ;
Cernocky, Jan 'Honza' ;
Glembek, Ondrej ;
Grezl, Frantisek ;
Karafiat, Martin ;
van Leeuwen, David A. ;
Matejka, Pavel ;
Schwarz, Petr ;
Strasheim, Albert .
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON AUDIO SPEECH AND LANGUAGE PROCESSING, 2007, 15 (07) :2072-2084
[5]   Application-independent evaluation of speaker detection [J].
Brümmer, N ;
du Preez, J .
COMPUTER SPEECH AND LANGUAGE, 2006, 20 (2-3) :230-275
[6]  
Brummer N., 2010, Measuring, refining and calibrating speaker and language information extracted from speech, DOI 10.1016/j.csl.6352005.08.001
[7]  
Enzinger E., 2009, THESIS U WIEN VIENNA
[8]  
Evett IW, 2012, 6 EUR AC FOR SCI C A
[9]  
Gonzalez-Rodriguez Joaquin, 2007, Speaker Classification I. Fundamentals, Features, and Methods. (Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence vol. 4343), P205, DOI 10.1007/978-3-540-74200-5_11
[10]   Emulating DNA: Rigorous quantification of evidential weight in transparent and testable forensic speaker recognition [J].
Gonzalez-Rodriguez, Joaquin ;
Rose, Phil ;
Ramos, Daniel ;
Toledano, Doroteo T. ;
Ortega-Garcia, Javier .
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON AUDIO SPEECH AND LANGUAGE PROCESSING, 2007, 15 (07) :2104-2115