Measuring individual significant change on the Beck Depression Inventory-II through IRT-based statistics

被引:29
作者
Brouwer, Danny [1 ,2 ]
Meijer, Rob R. [1 ]
Zevalkink, Jolien [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Groningen, Groningen, Netherlands
[2] Netherlands Psychoanalyt Inst, NL-1076 AB Amsterdam, Netherlands
关键词
item response theory; BDI-II; Z-test; individual change; depression; statistical methodology; test development; ITEM RESPONSE THEORY; PSYCHOTHERAPY OUTCOME RESEARCH; CLINICAL-SIGNIFICANCE METHODS; GAIN SCORES OBSOLETE; PSYCHOMETRIC EVALUATION; RELIABLE CHANGE; PSYCHOPATHOLOGY; PERSONALITY; OUTPATIENTS; PRECISION;
D O I
10.1080/10503307.2013.794400
中图分类号
B849 [应用心理学];
学科分类号
040203 ;
摘要
Several researchers have emphasized that item response theory (IRT)-based methods should be preferred over classical approaches in measuring change for individual patients. In the present study we discuss and evaluate the use of IRT-based statistics to measure statistical significant individual change on the Beck Depression Inventory-II (BDI-II, Beck, Steer, & Brown, 1996). We compare results obtained with a simple IRT-based statistical test (Z-test) to those obtained with the Reliable Change Index (RCI) in a sample of clinical outpatients. Mean group differences between the Z-test and the RCI were similar, but for some individuals change classifications differed. Differences were most evident for change scores within the lower range of depression scores. We show that this may have consequences for the measurement of individual change in psychotherapy outcome research and clinical practice.
引用
收藏
页码:489 / 501
页数:13
相关论文
共 67 条
  • [1] Dimensional and hierarchical models of depression using the Beck Depression Inventory-II in an Arab college student sample
    Al-Turkait, Fawziyah A.
    Ohaeri, Jude U.
    [J]. BMC PSYCHIATRY, 2010, 10
  • [2] [Anonymous], 2000, ITEM RESPONSE THEORY
  • [3] [Anonymous], 2000, DIAGN STAT MAN MENT, DOI DOI 10.1176/APPI.BOOKS.9780890425787
  • [4] [Anonymous], 1997, Handbook of modern item response theory, DOI DOI 10.1007/978-1-4757-2691-6_5
  • [5] [Anonymous], 1969, PSYCHMETR MONOGR
  • [6] Psychometric evaluation of the Beck Depression Inventory-II with primary care medical patients
    Arnau, RC
    Meagher, MW
    Norris, MP
    Bramson, R
    [J]. HEALTH PSYCHOLOGY, 2001, 20 (02) : 112 - 119
  • [7] Assessing clinical significance: Does it matter which method we use?
    Atkins, DC
    Bedics, JD
    McGlinchey, JB
    Beauchaine, TP
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CONSULTING AND CLINICAL PSYCHOLOGY, 2005, 73 (05) : 982 - 989
  • [8] Clinical significance methods: A comparison of statistical techniques
    Bauer, S
    Lambert, MJ
    Nielsen, SL
    [J]. JOURNAL OF PERSONALITY ASSESSMENT, 2004, 82 (01) : 60 - 70
  • [9] Beck A. T., 2002, BDI 2 NL HANDL
  • [10] Beck A.T., 1996, Manual for the BDI-II, DOI DOI 10.1037/T00742-000