Underestimation of roughness in rough rock joints

被引:83
作者
Hong, Eun-Soo
Lee, Jong-Sub [1 ]
Lee, In-Mo [1 ]
机构
[1] Korea Univ, Dept Civil Engn, Seoul 136701, South Korea
关键词
aliasing; JRC; roughness parameter; roughness mobilization; roughness underestimation;
D O I
10.1002/nag.678
中图分类号
P5 [地质学];
学科分类号
0709 ; 081803 ;
摘要
Numerous Studies have been made to improve Barton's shear strength model for the quantification of rock joints. However, in these previous studies, the roughness and shear strength of the rock joint have been underestimated especially for relatively high undulated profiles (joint roughness Coefficient C, (JRC) > 14). The main factors of roughness Underestimation ill rough rock joints are investigated for the proper quantification of rock joint roughness. The aliasing effect and the roughness characteristics are analyzed by using artificial joint profiles and natural rock joint profiles. A 3D camera scanner is adopted to verify the main source of underestimation when using conventional measurement methods. Shear strength tests are carried out by using two types of shear apparatus to study the roughness mobilization characteristics, which may also affect the roughness underestimation. The results of joint roughness assessment, Such as aliasing and undulation of waviness, show that the roughness can be underestimated in relatively rough joint profiles (JRC> 14). At least two components 017 roughness parameters are needed to properly represent the joint roughness, For example, the amplitude and the inclination angle of joint asperity. Roughness mobilization is affected by both the normal stress and the asperity scale. Copyright (c) 2008 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
引用
收藏
页码:1385 / 1403
页数:19
相关论文
共 37 条
[1]   EXPERIMENTAL STUDIES OF SCALE EFFECTS ON THE SHEAR BEHAVIOR OF ROCK JOINTS [J].
BANDIS, S ;
LUMSDEN, AC ;
BARTON, NR .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ROCK MECHANICS AND MINING SCIENCES, 1981, 18 (01) :1-21
[2]  
Barton N., 1977, Rock Mechanics, V10, P1, DOI 10.1007/BF01261801
[3]   STRENGTH, DEFORMATION AND CONDUCTIVITY COUPLING OF ROCK JOINTS [J].
BARTON, N ;
BANDIS, S ;
BAKHTAR, K .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ROCK MECHANICS AND MINING SCIENCES, 1985, 22 (03) :121-140
[4]   Estimation of the Joint Roughness Coefficient (JRC) by visual comparison [J].
Beer, AJ ;
Stead, D ;
Coggan, JS .
ROCK MECHANICS AND ROCK ENGINEERING, 2002, 35 (01) :65-74
[5]   Mechanism of metallic friction [J].
Bowden, FP ;
Tabor, D .
NATURE, 1942, 150 :197-199
[6]  
Brown ET., 1981, Rock characterization, testing and monitoring-ISRM suggested methods, P3
[7]  
BROWN SR, 1985, J GEOPHYS RES, V90
[8]  
Carr J. R., 1989, Bulletin, Vxxvi, P253
[9]   The scale dependence of rock joint surface roughness [J].
Fardin, N ;
Stephansson, O ;
Jing, LR .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ROCK MECHANICS AND MINING SCIENCES, 2001, 38 (05) :659-669
[10]   Roughness parameters [J].
Gadelmawla, ES ;
Koura, MM ;
Maksoud, TMA ;
Elewa, IM ;
Soliman, HH .
JOURNAL OF MATERIALS PROCESSING TECHNOLOGY, 2002, 123 (01) :133-145