PRIMING THE MOTOR CORTEX WITH ANODAL TRANSCRANIAL DIRECT CURRENT STIMULATION AFFECTS THE ACUTE INHIBITORY CORTICOSPINAL RESPONSES TO STRENGTH TRAINING

被引:13
|
作者
Frazer, Ashlyn K. [1 ]
Howatson, Glyn [2 ,3 ]
Ahtiainen, Juha P. [4 ]
Avela, Janne [4 ]
Rantalainen, Timo [4 ,5 ]
Kidgell, Dawson J. [1 ]
机构
[1] Monash Univ, Sch Primary Hlth Care, Fac Med Nursing & Hlth Sci, Dept Physiotherapy, Melbourne, Vic, Australia
[2] Northumbria Univ, Dept Sport Exercise & Rehabil, Newcastle Upon Tyne, Tyne & Wear, England
[3] North West Univ, Sch Biol Sci, Water Res Grp, Potchefstroom, South Africa
[4] Univ Jyvaskyla, Fac Sport & Hlth Sci, Dept Biol & Phys Act, Neuromuscular Res Ctr,Biol & Phys Act, Jyvaskyla, Finland
[5] Univ Jyvaskyla, Fac Sport & Hlth Sci, Dept Biol & Phys Act, Gerontol Res Ctr, Jyvaskyla, Finland
关键词
corticospinal excitability; corticospinal silent period; neuroplasticity; strength exercise; transcranial direct current stimulation; RESISTANCE EXERCISE; EXCITABILITY; ADAPTATIONS; MODULATION; SKILL; TDCS; PLASTICITY;
D O I
10.1519/JSC.0000000000002959
中图分类号
G8 [体育];
学科分类号
04 ; 0403 ;
摘要
Synaptic plasticity in the motor cortex (M1) is associated with strength training (ST) and can be modified by transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS). The M1 responses to ST increase when anodal tDCS is applied during training due to gating. An additional approach to improve the M1 responses to ST, which has not been explored, is to use anodal tDCS to prime the M1 before a bout of ST. We examined the priming effects of anodal tDCS of M1 on the acute corticospinal responses to ST. In a randomized double-blinded cross-over design, changes in isometric strength, corticospinal excitability, and inhibition (assessed as area under the recruitment curve [AURC] using transcranial magnetic stimulation) were analyzed in 13 adults exposed to 20 minutes of anodal tDCS and sham tDCS followed by a ST session of the right elbow flexors. We observed a significant decrease in isometric elbow-flexor strength immediately after training (11-12%; p < 0.05), which was not different between anodal tDCS and sham tDCS. Transcranial magnetic stimulation revealed a 24% increase in AURC for corticospinal excitability after anodal tDCS and ST; this increase was not different between conditions. However, there was a 14% reduction in AURC for corticospinal inhibition when anodal tDCS was applied before ST when compared with sham tDCS and ST (all p < 0.05). Priming anodal tDCS had a limited effect in facilitating corticospinal excitability after an acute bout of ST. Interestingly, the interaction of anodal tDCS and ST seems to affect the excitability of intracortical inhibitory circuits of the M1 through nonhomeostatic mechanisms.
引用
收藏
页码:307 / 317
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Does Cathodal Preconditioning Enhance the Effects of Subsequent Anodal Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation on Corticospinal Excitability and Grip Strength?
    Lewis, Aidan
    Rattray, Ben
    Flood, Andrew
    JOURNAL OF STRENGTH AND CONDITIONING RESEARCH, 2025, 39 (01) : e1 - e12
  • [22] Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation Targeting the Entire Motor Network Does Not Increase Corticospinal Excitability
    van der Cruijsen, Joris
    Jonker, Zeb D.
    Andrinopoulou, Eleni-Rosalina
    Wijngaarden, Jessica E.
    Tangkau, Ditte A.
    Tulen, Joke H. M.
    Frens, Maarten A.
    Ribbers, Gerard M.
    Selles, Ruud W.
    FRONTIERS IN HUMAN NEUROSCIENCE, 2022, 16
  • [23] Anodal transcranial direct current stimulation over premotor cortex facilitates observational learning of a motor sequence
    Wade, Stephanie
    Hammond, Geoff
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF NEUROSCIENCE, 2015, 41 (12) : 1597 - 1602
  • [24] Characterizing the application of transcranial direct current stimulation in human pharyngeal motor cortex
    Jefferson, Samantha
    Mistry, Satish
    Singh, Salil
    Rothwell, John
    Hamdy, Shaheen
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PHYSIOLOGY-GASTROINTESTINAL AND LIVER PHYSIOLOGY, 2009, 297 (06): : G1035 - G1040
  • [25] Anodal Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation of the Motor Cortex Ameliorates Chronic Pain and Reduces Short Intracortical Inhibition
    Antal, Andrea
    Terney, Daniella
    Kuehnl, Stefanie
    Paulus, Walter
    JOURNAL OF PAIN AND SYMPTOM MANAGEMENT, 2010, 39 (05) : 890 - 903
  • [26] Reduced isometric knee extensor force following anodal transcranial direct current stimulation of the ipsilateral motor cortex
    Savoury, Ryan G.
    Kibele, Armin
    Power, Kevin
    Herat, Nehara
    Alizadeh, Shahab
    Behm, David
    PLOS ONE, 2023, 18 (01):
  • [27] Effect of the anodal transcranial direct current electrical stimulation on cognition of medical residents with acute sleep deprivation
    San-Juan, Daniel
    May Mas, Raul Nathanael
    Gutierrez, Cuauhtemoc
    Morales, Jorge
    Diaz, Ana
    Quinones, Gerardo
    Kevin Galindo, Axel
    Armando Baigts, Luis
    Ximenez-Camilli, Cecilia
    Anschel, David
    SLEEP SCIENCE, 2022, 15 : 89 - 96
  • [28] Differential Modulation of Corticospinal Excitability by Different Current Densities of Anodal Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation
    Bastani, Andisheh
    Jaberzadeh, Shapour
    PLOS ONE, 2013, 8 (08):
  • [29] Different Current Intensities of Anodal Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation Do Not Differentially Modulate Motor Cortex Plasticity
    Kidgell, Dawson J.
    Daly, Robin M.
    Young, Kayleigh
    Lum, Jarrod
    Tooley, Gregory
    Jaberzadeh, Shapour
    Zoghi, Maryam
    Pearce, Alan J.
    NEURAL PLASTICITY, 2013, 2013
  • [30] Cerebellar, but not Motor or Parietal, High-Density Anodal Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation Facilitates Motor Adaptation
    Doppelmayr, Michael
    Pixa, Nils Henrik
    Steinberg, Fabian
    JOURNAL OF THE INTERNATIONAL NEUROPSYCHOLOGICAL SOCIETY, 2016, 22 (09) : 928 - 936