PRIMING THE MOTOR CORTEX WITH ANODAL TRANSCRANIAL DIRECT CURRENT STIMULATION AFFECTS THE ACUTE INHIBITORY CORTICOSPINAL RESPONSES TO STRENGTH TRAINING

被引:13
|
作者
Frazer, Ashlyn K. [1 ]
Howatson, Glyn [2 ,3 ]
Ahtiainen, Juha P. [4 ]
Avela, Janne [4 ]
Rantalainen, Timo [4 ,5 ]
Kidgell, Dawson J. [1 ]
机构
[1] Monash Univ, Sch Primary Hlth Care, Fac Med Nursing & Hlth Sci, Dept Physiotherapy, Melbourne, Vic, Australia
[2] Northumbria Univ, Dept Sport Exercise & Rehabil, Newcastle Upon Tyne, Tyne & Wear, England
[3] North West Univ, Sch Biol Sci, Water Res Grp, Potchefstroom, South Africa
[4] Univ Jyvaskyla, Fac Sport & Hlth Sci, Dept Biol & Phys Act, Neuromuscular Res Ctr,Biol & Phys Act, Jyvaskyla, Finland
[5] Univ Jyvaskyla, Fac Sport & Hlth Sci, Dept Biol & Phys Act, Gerontol Res Ctr, Jyvaskyla, Finland
关键词
corticospinal excitability; corticospinal silent period; neuroplasticity; strength exercise; transcranial direct current stimulation; RESISTANCE EXERCISE; EXCITABILITY; ADAPTATIONS; MODULATION; SKILL; TDCS; PLASTICITY;
D O I
10.1519/JSC.0000000000002959
中图分类号
G8 [体育];
学科分类号
04 ; 0403 ;
摘要
Synaptic plasticity in the motor cortex (M1) is associated with strength training (ST) and can be modified by transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS). The M1 responses to ST increase when anodal tDCS is applied during training due to gating. An additional approach to improve the M1 responses to ST, which has not been explored, is to use anodal tDCS to prime the M1 before a bout of ST. We examined the priming effects of anodal tDCS of M1 on the acute corticospinal responses to ST. In a randomized double-blinded cross-over design, changes in isometric strength, corticospinal excitability, and inhibition (assessed as area under the recruitment curve [AURC] using transcranial magnetic stimulation) were analyzed in 13 adults exposed to 20 minutes of anodal tDCS and sham tDCS followed by a ST session of the right elbow flexors. We observed a significant decrease in isometric elbow-flexor strength immediately after training (11-12%; p < 0.05), which was not different between anodal tDCS and sham tDCS. Transcranial magnetic stimulation revealed a 24% increase in AURC for corticospinal excitability after anodal tDCS and ST; this increase was not different between conditions. However, there was a 14% reduction in AURC for corticospinal inhibition when anodal tDCS was applied before ST when compared with sham tDCS and ST (all p < 0.05). Priming anodal tDCS had a limited effect in facilitating corticospinal excitability after an acute bout of ST. Interestingly, the interaction of anodal tDCS and ST seems to affect the excitability of intracortical inhibitory circuits of the M1 through nonhomeostatic mechanisms.
引用
收藏
页码:307 / 317
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Corticospinal excitability enhancement with simultaneous transcranial near-infrared stimulation and anodal direct current stimulation of motor cortex
    Song, Penghui
    Li, Siran
    Hao, Wensi
    Wei, Min
    Liu, Jianghong
    Lin, Hua
    Hu, Shimin
    Dai, Xiaona
    Wang, Jing
    Wang, Rong
    Wang, Yuping
    CLINICAL NEUROPHYSIOLOGY, 2021, 132 (05) : 1018 - 1024
  • [2] Expanding the parameter space of anodal transcranial direct current stimulation of the primary motor cortex
    Agboada, Desmond
    Samani, Mohsen Mosayebi
    Jamil, Asif
    Kuo, Min-Fang
    Nitsche, Michael A.
    SCIENTIFIC REPORTS, 2019, 9 (1)
  • [3] Anodal transcranial direct current stimulation of motor cortex does not ameliorate spasticity in multiple sclerosis
    Iodice, Rosa
    Dubbioso, Raffaele
    Ruggiero, Lucia
    Santoro, Lucio
    Manganelli, Fiore
    RESTORATIVE NEUROLOGY AND NEUROSCIENCE, 2015, 33 (04) : 487 - 492
  • [4] Cerebellar Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation Modulates Corticospinal Excitability During Motor Training
    Summers, Rebekah L. S.
    Chen, Mo
    Hatch, Andrea
    Kimberley, Teresa J.
    FRONTIERS IN HUMAN NEUROSCIENCE, 2018, 12
  • [5] Variability in Response to Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation of the Motor Cortex
    Wiethoff, Sarah
    Hamada, Masashi
    Rothwell, John C.
    BRAIN STIMULATION, 2014, 7 (03) : 468 - 475
  • [6] Effects of anodal transcranial direct current stimulation over lower limb primary motor cortex on motor learning in healthy individuals
    Foerster, Aguida
    Dutta, Anirban
    Kuo, Min-Fang
    Paulus, Walter
    Nitsche, Michael A.
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF NEUROSCIENCE, 2018, 47 (07) : 779 - 789
  • [7] The impact of anodal transcranial direct current stimulation of primary motor cortex on motor learning in older adults with low levels of activity
    Abedi, Razieh
    Talimkhani, Ailin
    Mohammadzadeh, Zahra
    Daryabor, Aliyeh
    Naimi, Sedigheh Sadat
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF THERAPY AND REHABILITATION, 2022, 29 (10)
  • [8] Anodal transcranial direct current stimulation of the motor cortex increases cortical voluntary activation and neural plasticity
    Frazer, Ashlyn
    Williams, Jacqueline
    Spittle, Michael
    Rantalainen, Timo
    Kidgell, Dawson
    MUSCLE & NERVE, 2016, 54 (05) : 903 - 913
  • [9] Systematic assessment of duration and intensity of anodal transcranial direct current stimulation on primary motor cortex excitability
    Tremblay, Sara
    Larochelle-Brunet, Felix
    Lafleur, Louis-Philippe
    El Mouderrib, Sofia
    Lepage, Jean-Francois
    Theoret, Hugo
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF NEUROSCIENCE, 2016, 44 (05) : 2184 - 2190
  • [10] Exploring and optimizing the neuroplastic effects of anodal transcranial direct current stimulation over the primary motor cortex of older humans
    Farnad, Leila
    Ghasemian-Shirvan, Ensiyeh
    Mosayebi-Samani, Mohsen
    Kuo, Min-Fang
    Nitsche, Michael A.
    BRAIN STIMULATION, 2021, 14 (03) : 622 - 634