Net Stable Funding Ratio (NSFR) and Bank Performance: A Study of the Indian Banks

被引:3
作者
Sidhu, Anureet Virk [1 ]
Rastogi, Shailesh [1 ]
Gupte, Rajani [2 ]
Rawal, Aashi [1 ]
Agarwal, Bhakti [1 ]
机构
[1] Symbiosis Int Univ, Symbiosis Inst Business Management, Pune 412115, India
[2] Symbiosis Int Univ, Dept Management, Pune 412115, India
关键词
NSFR; NIMs; ROA; NPAs ownership structure; dynamic panel data analysis; BASEL III; OWNERSHIP STRUCTURE; LIQUIDITY REGULATION; PANEL-DATA; EFFICIENCY; PROFITABILITY; IMPACT; RISK;
D O I
10.3390/jrfm15110527
中图分类号
F8 [财政、金融];
学科分类号
0202 ;
摘要
The present study examines the impact of the Net Stable Funding Ratio (NSFR) on the performance of Indian commercial banks from 2010 to 2021. The study further investigates how the relationship between liquidity and performance varies under the influence of bank-specific factors such as ownership structure (Promoter vs. Institutional investors). Bank performance is evaluated using a two-fold approach-Profitability measures (NIMs and ROA) and NPA levels of banks. Using the Dynamic panel data regression technique, we find that the relationship between NSFR and NIMs is negative, implying that bank NIMs tend to decline as banks comply with NSFR regulation. Furthermore, the study demonstrates that the inverse relationship between NSFR and bank NIMs becomes more profound when promoters' stakes are high. Finally, the results highlight that for banks with higher institutional holdings, NPA levels witness an upward trend as the NSFR ratio increases. From a policy perspective, study results will help policymakers understand how changes in liquidity levels impact the wider banking sector and guide them on the overall direction in which to progress with the reforms.
引用
收藏
页数:13
相关论文
共 53 条
[1]   The Impact of Basel III on Emerging Economies [J].
Abdel-Baki, Monal A. .
GLOBAL ECONOMY JOURNAL, 2012, 12 (02)
[2]  
Adesina KoladeSunday., 2021, J DEV AREAS, V55, P1, DOI [10.1353/jda.2021.0042, DOI 10.1353/JDA.2021.0042]
[3]  
Al Nimer M., 2015, EUR J BUS MANAGE, V7, P229
[4]  
[Anonymous], 2010, International framework for liquidity risk measurements, standards and monitoring
[5]   SOME TESTS OF SPECIFICATION FOR PANEL DATA - MONTE-CARLO EVIDENCE AND AN APPLICATION TO EMPLOYMENT EQUATIONS [J].
ARELLANO, M ;
BOND, S .
REVIEW OF ECONOMIC STUDIES, 1991, 58 (02) :277-297
[6]  
Arellano M., 2001, HDB ECONOMETRICS, V5, P3229, DOI DOI 10.1016/S1573-4412(01)05006-1
[7]   The impact of liquidity regulation on banks [J].
Banerjee, Ryan N. ;
Mio, Hitoshi .
JOURNAL OF FINANCIAL INTERMEDIATION, 2018, 35 :30-44
[8]   Ownership structure and risk in publicly held and privately owned banks [J].
Barry, Thierno Amadou ;
Lepetit, Laetitia ;
Tarazi, Amine .
JOURNAL OF BANKING & FINANCE, 2011, 35 (05) :1327-1340
[9]   Do bank regulation, supervision and monitoring enhance or impede bank efficiency? [J].
Barth, James R. ;
Lin, Chen ;
Ma, Yue ;
Seade, Jesus ;
Song, Frank M. .
JOURNAL OF BANKING & FINANCE, 2013, 37 (08) :2879-2892
[10]   Do we need big banks? Evidence on performance, strategy and market discipline [J].
Bertay, Ata Can ;
Demirguec-Kunt, Asli ;
Huizinga, Harry .
JOURNAL OF FINANCIAL INTERMEDIATION, 2013, 22 (04) :532-558