Can green financial development promote regional ecological efficiency? A case study of China

被引:156
作者
Liu, Rongyan [1 ]
Wang, Deqing [1 ]
Zhang, Li [1 ]
Zhang, Lihong [1 ]
机构
[1] China Univ Min & Technol, Sch Management, 1 Daxue Rd, Xuzhou 221116, Jiangsu, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
Green finance; Ecological efficiency; Industrial structure; Green economy; ENVIRONMENTAL EFFICIENCY; CLIMATE FUND; FOOTPRINT; MECHANISM; CARE;
D O I
10.1007/s11069-018-3502-x
中图分类号
P [天文学、地球科学];
学科分类号
07 ;
摘要
This paper aims to objectively identify the impact of green finance on the green economy of China, and then put forward some suggestions that good for the government to guide the development of green finance, and promote the full play of finance in promoting development of the green economy. Through constructing an index system and a super-efficiency slack-based model, this study measures the level of green financial development and regional ecological efficiency, respectively, for Chinese 30 provinces between 2010 and 2015. On this basis, taking per capita GDP, industrial structure, urbanization rate, and energy efficiency as controlling variables, we construct a varying intercept model and a varying coefficient model. Our primary findings are that the impact of China's green financial development on regional ecological efficiency is not obvious in general, and the corresponding average influence coefficient is -0.1847, which is inconsistent with theoretical analysis. Also, other impacts from per capita GDP, industrial structure, urbanization rate, and energy efficiency on ecological efficiency are statistically significant; the coefficients are -0.1701, 0.3901, 0.5410, and 0.3022, respectively. Moreover, there are significant regional differences in the impacts of green financial development on ecological efficiency. For some provinces, such as Tianjin, Jilin, and Heilongjiang, green financial development significantly promotes ecological efficiency. However, for Beijing, Jiangsu, and Zhejiang, it is inconsistent with theoretical analysis.
引用
收藏
页码:325 / 341
页数:17
相关论文
共 41 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 2016, ENV PROT
[2]  
[Anonymous], POPUL RESOUR ENV CHI
[3]   The Green Climate Fund as an effective compensatory mechanism in global climate negotiations [J].
Antimiani, Alessandro ;
Costantini, Valeria ;
Markandya, Anil ;
Paglialunga, Elena ;
Sforna, Giorgia .
ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE & POLICY, 2017, 77 :49-68
[4]   Managing ethical risk: How investing in ethics adds value [J].
Chami, R ;
Cosimano, TF ;
Fullenkamp, C .
JOURNAL OF BANKING & FINANCE, 2002, 26 (09) :1697-1718
[5]   The impact of economic development and social-political factors on ecological footprint: A panel data analysis for 15 MENA countries [J].
Charfeddine, Lanouar ;
Mrabet, Zouhair .
RENEWABLE & SUSTAINABLE ENERGY REVIEWS, 2017, 76 :138-154
[6]   Environmental efficiency analysis of the Yangtze River Economic Zone using super efficiency data envelopment analysis (SEDEA) and tobit models [J].
Chen, Nengcheng ;
Xu, Lei ;
Chen, Zeqiang .
ENERGY, 2017, 134 :659-671
[7]  
Chen P, 2016, ENV PROT SCI, V1, P52
[8]   Green and Good? The Investment Performance of US Environmental Mutual Funds [J].
Climent, Francisco ;
Soriano, Pilar .
JOURNAL OF BUSINESS ETHICS, 2011, 103 (02) :275-287
[9]  
Cowan E, 1999, Res Pap was Comm by Asia Branch Can Int Dev Agency, V1, P1
[10]   Exploring the Schemes for Green Climate Fund Financing: International Lessons [J].
Cui, Lianbiao ;
Huang, Yuran .
WORLD DEVELOPMENT, 2018, 101 :173-187