Corporate Competitiveness Index of Climate Change: A Balanced Scorecard Approach

被引:9
作者
Myung, Jae Kyu [1 ]
An, Hyoung-Tae [2 ]
Lee, Su-Yol [3 ]
机构
[1] Korea Univ Technol & Educ, Dept Small & Medium Enterprise Management, 1600 Chungjeol Ro, Cheonan 31253, Chungnam, South Korea
[2] Ansan Univ, Dept Tax Accounting, Ansandaehak Ro 155, Ansan 15328, Gyeonggi, South Korea
[3] Chonnam Natl Univ, Coll Business Adm, Yongbong Ro 77, Gwangju 61186, South Korea
关键词
corporate competitiveness; climate change; Balanced Scorecard; performance evaluation; indicators; conceptual study; AFFECT FINANCIAL PERFORMANCE; ENVIRONMENTAL PERFORMANCE; FIRMS;
D O I
10.3390/su11051445
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Climate change is one of the most critical issues in the business sector. This conceptual study proposes a corporate competitiveness evaluation model of climate change by adopting the Balanced Scorecard approach. This study provides a series of specific performance and competitiveness indicators of climate change in the four dimensions of learning and growth, internal process, external stakeholders, and finance and carbon performance. The indicators, which use both quantitative and qualitative methods, can be immediately applied in the field. This study presents practical guidelines to successfully adopt and implement the competitiveness evaluation model in an organization by considering prevalent innovation tools of business process management, process visualization, and knowledge socialization. Finally, it provides some implications for managers and policy-makers who wish to proactively address climate change in the business sector.
引用
收藏
页数:16
相关论文
共 46 条
[1]   CRED: A new model of climate and development [J].
Ackerman, Frank ;
Stanton, Elizabeth A. ;
Bueno, Ramon .
ECOLOGICAL ECONOMICS, 2013, 85 :166-176
[2]   The mediating role of the employee relations climate in the relationship between strategic HRM and organizational performance in Chinese banks [J].
Ali, Muhammad ;
Lei, Shen ;
Wei, Xiao-Yong .
JOURNAL OF INNOVATION & KNOWLEDGE, 2018, 3 (03) :115-122
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2012, SPECIAL REPORT WORKI
[4]   FIRM RESOURCES AND SUSTAINED COMPETITIVE ADVANTAGE [J].
BARNEY, J .
JOURNAL OF MANAGEMENT, 1991, 17 (01) :99-120
[5]   CORPORATE ENVIRONMENTAL PERFORMANCE AND LOBBYING [J].
Delmas, Magali ;
Lim, Jinghui ;
Nairn-Birch, Nicholas .
ACADEMY OF MANAGEMENT DISCOVERIES, 2016, 2 (02) :175-197
[6]  
Elkington J., 1998, CANNIBALS FORKS, DOI DOI 10.1002/TQEM.3310080106
[7]  
Epstein M J., 1996, Environmental Quality Management, V6, P11, DOI [DOI 10.1002/TQEM.3310060104, 10.1002/tqem.3310060104]
[8]  
Figge F., 2002, Business Strategy and the Environment, V11, P269, DOI DOI 10.1002/BSE.339
[9]   Corporate climate change mitigation: a systematic review of the existing empirical evidence [J].
Glienke, Nele ;
Guenther, Edeltraud .
MANAGEMENT RESEARCH REVIEW, 2016, 39 (01) :2-34
[10]   Bouncing Back from Extreme Weather Events: Some Preliminary Findings on Resilience Barriers Facing Small and Medium-Sized Enterprises [J].
Halkos, George ;
Skouloudis, Antonis ;
Malesios, Chrisovaladis ;
Evangelinos, Konstantinos .
BUSINESS STRATEGY AND THE ENVIRONMENT, 2018, 27 (04) :547-559