Clinical Utility of Lefamulin: If Not Now, When?

被引:15
作者
Mercuro, Nicholas J. [1 ]
Veve, Michael P. [2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Beth Israel Deaconess Med Ctr, Dept Pharm, Boston, MA 02215 USA
[2] Univ Tennessee, Hlth Sci Ctr, Coll Pharm, Dept Clin Pharm & Translat Sci, Knoxville, TN 37920 USA
[3] Univ Tennessee, Med Ctr, Dept Pharm, 1924 Alcoa Highway,Box 117, Knoxville, TN 37920 USA
关键词
Pleuromutilin; Lefamulin; Treatment; Gram-positive; Methicillin-resistantStaphylococcus aureus; Antimicrobial stewardship; IN-VITRO ACTIVITIES; PLEUROMUTILIN ANTIBIOTICS; STREPTOCOCCUS-PNEUMONIAE; PHARMACOKINETICS; EPIDEMIOLOGY; INFECTIONS;
D O I
10.1007/s11908-020-00732-z
中图分类号
R51 [传染病];
学科分类号
100401 ;
摘要
Purpose of Review The looming threat of antimicrobial resistance requires robust stewardship and new developments in infectious diseases pharmacotherapy. This review discusses the pertinent spectrum and clinical data of lefamulin (Xenleta (R)), with a focus on potential real-world use. Recent Findings Lefamulin is a novel pleuromutilin antibiotic that obtained Food and Drug Administration labeling for community-acquired bacterial pneumonia (CABP) in 2019. Lefamulin is available in both intravenous and oral formulations, and it inhibits bacterial protein synthesis inhibition through interactive binding to unique sites of the peptidyl transferase center of the 50s bacterial ribosome subunit. Resistance, including cross-resistance with other antibiotics, is infrequent. Lefamulin demonstrates activity against most Gram-positive pathogens and other organisms commonly associated with CABP, i.e.,Streptococcus pneumoniae, Haemophilus influenzae, Mycoplasma pneumoniae, Legionella pneumophila, andChlamydophila pneumoniae. Lefamulin may also be an option for serious public health threats like methicillin-resistantStaphylococcus aureus, vancomycin-resistantEnterococcus faecium, and multi-drug-resistant organisms associated with sexually transmitted infections, e.g.,Neisseria gonorrhoeae, Mycoplasma genitalium. Lefamulin lacks activity againstPseudomonas aeruginosa, Acinetobacter baumannii, Enterobacterales, most anaerobes, andE. faecalis. In Phase III trials, lefamulin monotherapy was non-inferior to moxifloxacin with or without linezolid for CABP. Lefamulin is a well-tolerated agent with a unique mechanism, availability in both IV and PO formulations, and it has been rigorously studied for safety and efficacy for CABP.
引用
收藏
页数:13
相关论文
共 72 条
[1]   Oral Lefamulin vs Moxifloxacin for Early Clinical Response Among Adults With Community-Acquired Bacterial Pneumonia: The LEAP 2 Randomized Clinical Trial [J].
Alexander, Elizabeth ;
Goldberg, Lisa ;
Das, Anita F. ;
Moran, Gregory J. ;
Sandrock, Christian ;
Gasink, Leanne B. ;
Spera, Patricia ;
Sweeney, Carolyn ;
Paukner, Susanne ;
Wicha, Wolfgang W. ;
Gelone, Steven P. ;
Schranz, Jennifer .
JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 2019, 322 (17) :1661-1671
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2018, QUAL INF DIS PROD DE
[3]  
[Anonymous], NDA BLA MULT REV EV
[4]  
[Anonymous], FDA ID INT CRIT LEF
[5]  
[Anonymous], 2014, Core Elements of Hospital Antibiotic Stewardship Programs
[6]  
[Anonymous], 2020, RES INF APPR DRUGS
[7]  
[Anonymous], 2019, Antibiotic Resistance Threats in the United States
[8]  
[Anonymous], GIL SCI STAT REQ RES
[9]   Estimating National Trends in Inpatient Antibiotic Use Among US Hospitals From 2006 to 2012 [J].
Baggs, James ;
Fridkin, Scott K. ;
Pollack, Lori A. ;
Srinivasan, Arjun ;
Jernigan, John A. .
JAMA INTERNAL MEDICINE, 2016, 176 (11) :1639-1648
[10]  
Barlam TF, 2016, CLIN INFECT DIS, V62, pE51, DOI 10.1093/cid/ciw118