Combination of PI-RADS score and PSAD can improve the diagnostic accuracy of prostate cancer and reduce unnecessary prostate biopsies

被引:12
作者
Wang, Changming [1 ]
Yuan, Lei [2 ]
Shen, Deyun [1 ]
Zhang, Bin [3 ]
Wu, Baorui [1 ]
Zhang, Panrui [4 ]
Xiao, Jun [1 ,3 ]
Tao, Tao [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Sci & Technol China, Affiliated Hosp USTC China 1, Dept Urol, Div Life Sci & Med, Hefei, Peoples R China
[2] Univ Sci & Technol China, Affiliated Hosp USTC 1, Dept Radiol, Div Life Sci & Med, Hefei, Peoples R China
[3] Anhui Med Univ, Affiliated Anhui Prov Hosp, Dept Urol, Hefei, Peoples R China
[4] Univ Sci & Technol China, Sch Basic Med Sci, Div Life Sci & Med, Hefei Natl Lab Phys Sci Microscale,CAS Key Lab Inn, Hefei, Peoples R China
关键词
prostate cancer; prostate biopsy; multiparameter magnetic resonance imaging; prostate imaging-reporting and data system score; prostate-specific antigen density; PREVENTION TRIAL; STATISTICS;
D O I
10.3389/fonc.2022.1024204
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
ObjectivesThe purpose of this study is to evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of the clinical variables of patients with prostate cancer (PCa) and to provide a strategy to reduce unnecessary biopsies. Patients and methodsA Chinese cohort that consists of 833 consecutive patients who underwent prostate biopsies from January 2018 to April 2022 was collected in this retrospective study. Diagnostic ability for total PCa and clinically significant PCa (csPCa) was evaluated by prostate imaging-reporting and data system (PI-RADS) score and other clinical variables. Univariate and multivariable logistic regression analyses were performed to figure out the independent predictors. Diagnostic accuracy was estimated by plotting receiver operating characteristic curves. ResultsThe results of univariate and multivariable analyses demonstrated that the PI-RADS score (P < 0.001, OR: 5.724, 95% CI: 4.517-7.253)/(P < 0.001, OR: 5.199, 95% CI: 4.039-6.488) and prostate-specific antigen density (PSAD) (P < 0.001, OR: 2.756, 95% CI: 1.560-4.870)/(P < 0.001, OR: 4.726, 95% CI: 2.661-8.396) were the independent clinical factors for predicting total PCa/csPCa. The combination of the PI-RADS score and PSAD presented the best diagnostic performance for the detection of PCa and csPCa. For the diagnostic criterion of "PI-RADS score >= 3 or PSAD >= 0.3", the sensitivity and negative predictive values were 94.0% and 93.1% for the diagnosis of total PCa and 99.2% and 99.3% for the diagnosis of csPCa, respectively. For the diagnostic criterion "PI-RADS score >3 and PSAD >= 0.3", the specificity and positive predictive values were 96.8% and 92.6% for the diagnosis of total PCa and 93.5% and 82.4% for the diagnosis of csPCa, respectively. ConclusionsThe combination of the PI-RADS score and PSAD can implement the extraordinary diagnostic performance of PCa. Many patients may safely execute active surveillance or take systematic treatment without prostate biopsies by stratification according to the PI-RADS score and the value of PSAD.
引用
收藏
页数:10
相关论文
共 32 条
[1]   MRI-Targeted, Systematic, and Combined Biopsy for Prostate Cancer Diagnosis [J].
Ahdoot, Michael ;
Wilbur, Andrew R. ;
Reese, Sarah E. ;
Lebastchi, Amir H. ;
Mehralivand, Sherif ;
Gomella, Patrick T. ;
Bloom, Jonathan ;
Gurram, Sandeep ;
Siddiqui, Minhaj ;
Pinsky, Paul ;
Parnes, Howard ;
Linehan, W. Marston ;
Merino, Maria ;
Choyke, Peter L. ;
Shih, Joanna H. ;
Turkbey, Baris ;
Wood, Bradford J. ;
Pinto, Peter A. .
NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 2020, 382 (10) :917-928
[2]   Prostate Cancer Prevention Trial Risk Calculator 2.0 for the Prediction of Low- vs High-grade Prostate Cancer [J].
Ankerst, Donna P. ;
Hoefler, Josef ;
Bock, Sebastian ;
Goodman, Phyllis J. ;
Vickers, Andrew ;
Hernandez, Javier ;
Sokoll, Lori J. ;
Sanda, Martin G. ;
Wei, John T. ;
Leach, Robin J. ;
Thompson, Ian M. .
UROLOGY, 2014, 83 (06) :1362-1367
[3]   Optimizing Spatial Biopsy Sampling for the Detection of Prostate Cancer [J].
不详 .
JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2021, 206 (03) :595-595
[4]   Comparison of complications after transrectal and transperineal prostate biopsy: a national population-based study [J].
Berry, Brendan ;
Parry, Matthew G. ;
Sujenthiran, Arunan ;
Nossiter, Julie ;
Cowling, Thomas E. ;
Aggarwal, Ajay ;
Cathcart, Paul ;
Payne, Heather ;
van der Meulen, Jan ;
Clarke, Noel .
BJU INTERNATIONAL, 2020, 126 (01) :97-103
[5]   What Are We Missing? False-Negative Cancers at Multiparametric MR Imaging of the Prostate [J].
Borofsky, Samuel ;
George, Arvin K. ;
Gaur, Sonia ;
Bernardo, Marcelino ;
Greer, Matthew D. ;
Mertan, Francesca V. ;
Taffel, Myles ;
Moreno, Vanesa ;
Merino, Maria J. ;
Wood, Bradford J. ;
Pinto, Peter A. ;
Choyke, Peter L. ;
Turkbey, Baris .
RADIOLOGY, 2018, 286 (01) :186-195
[6]   Repeat Prostate Biopsy: Rationale, Indications, and Strategies [J].
Capitanio, Umberto ;
Pfister, David ;
Emberton, Mark .
EUROPEAN UROLOGY FOCUS, 2015, 1 (02) :127-136
[7]   Biomarkers for prostate cancer: prostate-specific antigen and beyond [J].
Duffy, Michael J. .
CLINICAL CHEMISTRY AND LABORATORY MEDICINE, 2020, 58 (03) :326-339
[8]   PI-RADS: what is new and how to use it [J].
Dutruel, Silvina P. ;
Jeph, Sunil ;
Margolis, Daniel J. A. ;
Wehrli, Natasha .
ABDOMINAL RADIOLOGY, 2020, 45 (12) :3951-3960
[9]   The Additive Diagnostic Value of Prostate-specific Membrane Antigen Positron Emission Tomography Computed Tomography to Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging Triage in the Diagnosis of Prostate Cancer (PRIMARY): A Prospective Multicentre Study [J].
Emmett, Louise ;
Buteau, James ;
Papa, Nathan ;
Moon, Daniel ;
Thompson, James ;
Roberts, Matthew J. ;
Rasiah, Kris ;
Pattison, David A. ;
Yaxley, John ;
Thomas, Paul ;
Hutton, Anthony C. ;
Agrawal, Shikha ;
Amin, Amer ;
Blazevski, Alexandar ;
Chalasani, Venu ;
Ho, Bao ;
Nguyen, Andrew ;
Liu, Victor ;
Lee, Jonathan ;
Sheehan-Dare, Gemma ;
Kooner, Raji ;
Coughlin, Geoff ;
Chan, Lyn ;
Cusick, Thomas ;
Namdarian, Benjamin ;
Kapoor, Jada ;
Alghazo, Omar ;
Woo, Henry H. ;
Lawrentschuk, Nathan ;
Murphy, Declan ;
Hofman, Michael S. ;
Stricker, Phillip .
EUROPEAN UROLOGY, 2021, 80 (06) :682-689
[10]   The 2014 International Society of Urological Pathology (ISUP) Consensus Conference on Gleason Grading of Prostatic Carcinoma Definition of Grading Patterns and Proposal for a New Grading System [J].
Epstein, Jonathan I. ;
Egevad, Lars ;
Amin, Mahul B. ;
Delahunt, Brett ;
Srigley, John R. ;
Humphrey, Peter A. .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SURGICAL PATHOLOGY, 2016, 40 (02) :244-252