Central Versus Peripheral Blood Pressure in Malignant Hypertension; Effects of Antihypertensive Treatment

被引:6
|
作者
van den Bogaard, Bas [1 ]
Immink, Rogier V. [2 ,3 ]
Westerhof, Berend E. [3 ,4 ]
van Montfrans, Gert A. [1 ]
van Lieshout, Johannes J. [3 ,5 ]
van den Born, Bert-Jan H. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Amsterdam, Acad Med Ctr, Dept Vasc Med, NL-1105 AZ Amsterdam, Netherlands
[2] Univ Utrecht, Univ Med Ctr Utrecht, Dept Anesthesiol, Utrecht, Netherlands
[3] Univ Amsterdam, Acad Med Ctr, Ctr Heart Failure Res, Lab Clin Cardiovasc Physiol, NL-1105 AZ Amsterdam, Netherlands
[4] BMEYE BV, Amsterdam, Netherlands
[5] Univ Nottingham, Sch Med, Queens Med Ctr, Sch Biomed Sci, Nottingham NG7 2RD, England
关键词
malignant hypertension; central blood pressure; hemodynamics; wave reflection; blood pressure; hypertension; DYNAMIC CEREBRAL AUTOREGULATION; PULSE PRESSURE; HEART-RATE; NITROPRUSSIDE; ASSOCIATION; PREVENTION; OUTCOMES; DISEASE; AORTA;
D O I
10.1093/ajh/hps075
中图分类号
R6 [外科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100210 ;
摘要
BACKGROUND Sodium nitroprusside (SNP) and labetalol are recommended for the immediate treatment of malignant hypertension. Both are intravenous agents but have different effects on systemic hemodynamics, and may have differential effects on pulse-wave reflection and pulse-pressure amplification, with consequences for peripheral versus central blood pressures (BPs). METHODS We conducted a nonrandomized, open-label study of 8 patients treated with sodium nitroprusside (mean age (+/- SD), 44 +/- 14 years; 6 males; diastolic/systolic BR 225 22/135 +/- 8 mm Hg) and 6 patients treated with intravenous labetalol (mean age, 39 +/- 15 years; 4 males; systolic/diastolic BR 232 +/- 22/138 +/- 17 mm Hg) before and after treatment for malignant hypertension, aiming at a 25% reduction in mean arterial pressure. We measured peripheral pressures with an intra-arterial catheter in the radial artery and derived central pressures with a generalized transfer filter. RESULTS Mean arterial pressure was similarly reduced with sodium nitroprusside and labetalol (by 27% and 30%, respectively; P = 0.76). There was a nonsignificantly greater reduction in peripheral systolic blood pressure (SBP) with labetalol than with sodium nitroprusside (29 +/- 11% vs. 18 +/- 7%, P = 0.08). The decline in peripheral diastolic blood pressure (DBP) with the two agents was comparable, whereas the reduction in peripheral pulse pressure was 8 +/- 16% with SNP and 33 +/- 17% with labetalol (P = 0.01). The decline in reflection magnitude was greater with SNP than with labetalol. There were no significant differences in the reduction of central BP with SNP and labetalol. The amplification of PP increased with SNP but did not change with labetalol. CONCLUSIONS We found no difference in central SBP or PP in subjects treated with SNP and labetalol, but labetalol produced a greater reduction in peripheral SBP and PP in the immediate treatment of malignant hypertension.
引用
收藏
页码:574 / 579
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Central versus peripheral blood pressure measurements
    Safar, M
    HYPERTENSION, 2005, 45 (05) : E14 - E14
  • [2] Comparison of the Effects of Antihypertensive Agents on Central Blood Pressure and Arterial Stiffness in Isolated Systolic Hypertension
    Mackenzie, Isla S.
    McEniery, Carmel M.
    Dhakam, Zahid
    Brown, Morris J.
    Cockcroft, John R.
    Wilkinson, Ian B.
    HYPERTENSION, 2009, 54 (02) : 409 - 413
  • [3] Effects of antihypertensive treatment in monotherapy on the circadian pattern of blood pressure in patients with essential hypertension
    Hermida, RC
    Calvo, C
    Ayala, DE
    Dominguez, MJ
    Covelo, M
    Lopez, JE
    JOURNAL OF HYPERTENSION, 2003, 21 : S63 - S63
  • [4] Antihypertensive treatment and blood pressure control relative to hypertension treatment guidelines
    Rowan, Christopher G.
    Turner, John Rick
    Shah, Ankit
    Spaeder, Jeffrey A.
    PHARMACOEPIDEMIOLOGY AND DRUG SAFETY, 2014, 23 (12) : 1294 - 1302
  • [5] Upward Hypertension Trends: Changes in Blood Pressure or in Antihypertensive Treatment?
    Chiolero, Arnaud
    Paccaud, Fred
    Bovet, Pascal
    HYPERTENSION, 2009, 53 (03) : E22 - E22
  • [6] Central versus peripheral blood pressure: finding a solution
    Laurent, Stephane
    Sharman, James
    Boutouyrie, Pierre
    JOURNAL OF HYPERTENSION, 2016, 34 (08) : 1497 - 1499
  • [7] The Effect of Antihypertensive Drugs on Central Blood Pressure Beyond Peripheral Blood Pressure. Part II: Evidence for Specific Class-Effects of Antihypertensive Drugs on Pressure Amplification
    Protogerou, Athanase D.
    Stergiou, George S.
    Vlachopoulos, Charalambos
    Blacher, Jacques
    Achimastos, Apostolos
    CURRENT PHARMACEUTICAL DESIGN, 2009, 15 (03) : 272 - 289
  • [8] Clinical significance of central blood pressure measurement in antihypertensive treatment
    Masugata, Hisashi
    Senda, Shoichi
    EXPERT REVIEW OF CARDIOVASCULAR THERAPY, 2010, 8 (06) : 763 - 765
  • [9] Importance of central and peripheral blood pressure for adjustment of arterial hypertension
    Nuernberger, J.
    HERZ, 2012, 37 (07) : 735 - 741
  • [10] EFFECTS OF ALISKIREN plus HYDROCHLOROTHIAZIDE VERSUS AMLODIPINE ON PERIPHERAL AND CENTRAL BLOOD PRESSURE IN AFRICAN AMERICAN PATIENTS WITH STAGE 2 HYPERTENSION
    Ferdinand, K.
    Pool, J.
    Weitzman, R.
    Purkayastha, D.
    Townsend, R.
    JOURNAL OF HYPERTENSION, 2010, 28 : E18 - E18