Efficacy of low-dose versus high-dose simethicone with polyethylene glycol for bowel preparation: A prospective randomized controlled trial

被引:12
作者
Li, De-feng [1 ]
Luo, Ming-han [1 ]
Du, Qing-qing [1 ]
Zhang, Hai-yang [1 ]
Tian, Yan-hui [1 ]
Liu, Ting-ting [1 ]
Shi, Rui-yue [1 ]
Xiong, Feng [1 ]
Lai, Ming-guang [1 ]
Li, Ying-xue [1 ]
Luo, Su [1 ]
Song, Yang [1 ]
Wu, Ben-hua [1 ]
Xu, Zheng-lei [1 ]
Zhang, Ding-guo [1 ]
Yao, Jun [1 ]
Wang, Li-sheng [1 ]
机构
[1] Jinan Univ, Shenzhen Peoples Hosp, Clin Med Coll 2, Dept Gastroenterol, Shenzhen 518020, Peoples R China
关键词
bowel preparation; colonoscopy; polyethylene glycol; simethicone; PREPARATION QUALITY; COLONOSCOPY; IMPACT; ADENOMA; MULTICENTER; SOCIETY; POLYP;
D O I
10.1111/jgh.15022
中图分类号
R57 [消化系及腹部疾病];
学科分类号
摘要
Background and Aim Additional simethicone (SIM) can improve adequate bowel preparation and adenoma detection rate (ADR). However, there is no consensus on the optimal dose of SIM. In this study, we compared the adequate bowel preparation rate with supplementation of split-dose 2 L polyethylene glycol (PEG) with low-dose SIM (200 mg) versus high-dose SIM (1200 mg). Methods This was a prospective, randomized, observer-blinded trial involving consecutive subjects undergoing colonoscopy. The primary outcome was adequate bowel preparation as assessed by Boston Bowel Preparation Scale (BBPS) score. Results Four hundred subjects were randomly allocated to low-dose SIM or high-dose SIM group. Baseline characteristics were comparable in the two groups (P > 0.05). No significant between-group differences were observed with respect to total bubble scale (BS) (8.49 +/- 1.00vs8.39 +/- 1.10,P = 0.07), total BBPS score (8.70 +/- 0.81vs8.29 +/- 1.18,P = 0.98), ADR (33.68%vs31.79%,P = 0.69) or withdrawal time (13 [range, 10-16] minvs13 [10-15] min,P = 0.96). The intubation time in low-dose SIM group was significantly shorter than that in high-dose SIM group (8 (4-16) minvs10 [6-17] min,P = 0.04). In addition, BS scores as well as diminutive ADR in right colon were superior in the low-dose SIM group (2.68 +/- 0.59vs2.52 +/- 0.73,P = 0.03 and 54.29%vs30.30%,P = 0.046, respectively). Conclusion Addition of low-dose SIM to split-dose 2 L PEG was as effective as addition of high-dose SIM with respect to adequate bowel preparation, ADR and patient tolerance. However, low-dose SIM was superior with respect to intubation time, right colon BS scores, right colon diminutive ADR and cost savings.
引用
收藏
页码:1488 / 1494
页数:7
相关论文
共 38 条
[1]   Comparison of asymmetric (low morning-dose) and standard split-dose regimen of PEG plus bisacodyl for bowel preparation: A randomized controlled trial [J].
Andreozzi, Paolo ;
De Nucci, Germana ;
Bezzio, Cristina ;
Arena, Ilaria ;
Devani, Massimo ;
Mandelli, Enzo ;
Morganti, Daniela ;
Omazzi, Barbara ;
Reati, Raffaella ;
Redaelli, Davide ;
Saibeni, Simone ;
Manes, Gianpiero .
DIGESTIVE AND LIVER DISEASE, 2019, 51 (06) :837-842
[2]   Impact of preprocedure simethicone on adenoma detection rate during colonoscopy: a multicenter, endoscopist-blinded randomized controlled trial [J].
Bai, Yu ;
Fang, Jun ;
Zhao, Sheng-Bing ;
Wang, Dong ;
Li, Yan-Qing ;
Shi, Rui-Hua ;
Sun, Zi-Qin ;
Sun, Ming-Jun ;
Ji, Feng ;
Si, Jian-Min ;
Li, Zhao-Shen .
ENDOSCOPY, 2018, 50 (02) :128-136
[3]   Association of Colonoscopy and Death From Colorectal Cancer [J].
Baxter, Nancy N. ;
Goldwasser, Meredith A. ;
Paszat, Lawrence F. ;
Saskin, Refik ;
Urbach, David R. ;
Rabeneck, Linda .
ANNALS OF INTERNAL MEDICINE, 2009, 150 (01) :1-W1
[4]   Modifiable factors associated with patient-reported pain during and after screening colonoscopy [J].
Bugajski, Marek ;
Wieszczy, Paulina ;
Hoff, Geir ;
Rupinski, Maciej ;
Regula, Jaroslaw ;
Kaminski, Michal Filip .
GUT, 2018, 67 (11) :1958-1964
[5]  
Chen H., 2018, MATERIALS, V11, P1, DOI DOI 10.1136/GUTJNL-2018-317124
[6]   Prevalence of missed adenomas in patients with inadequate bowel preparation on screening colonoscopy [J].
Chokshi, Reena V. ;
Hovis, Christine E. ;
Hollander, Thomas ;
Early, Dayna S. ;
Wang, Jean S. .
GASTROINTESTINAL ENDOSCOPY, 2012, 75 (06) :1197-1203
[7]   Quantification of Adequate Bowel Preparation for Screening or Surveillance Colonoscopy in Men [J].
Clark, Brian T. ;
Protiva, Petr ;
Nagar, Anil ;
Imaeda, Avlin ;
Ciarleglio, Maria M. ;
Deng, Yanhong ;
Laine, Loren .
GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2016, 150 (02) :396-405
[8]   What Level of Bowel Prep Quality Requires Early Repeat Colonoscopy: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of the Impact of Preparation Quality on Adenoma Detection Rate [J].
Clark, Brian T. ;
Rustagi, Tarun ;
Laine, Loren .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2014, 109 (11) :1714-1723
[9]   Effectiveness of screening colonoscopy in reducing the risk of death from right and left colon cancer: a large community-based study [J].
Doubeni, Chyke A. ;
Corley, Douglas A. ;
Quinn, Virginia P. ;
Jensen, Christopher D. ;
Zauber, Ann G. ;
Goodman, Michael ;
Johnson, Jill R. ;
Mehta, Shivan J. ;
Becerra, Tracy A. ;
Zhao, Wei K. ;
Schottinger, Joanne ;
Doria-Rose, V. Paul ;
Levin, Theodore R. ;
Weiss, Noel S. ;
Fletcher, Robert H. .
GUT, 2018, 67 (02) :291-U253
[10]   Randomized trial of low-volume PEG solution versus standard PEG plus electrolytes for bowel cleansing before colonoscopy [J].
Ell, Christian ;
Fischbach, Wolfgang ;
Bronisch, Hans-Joachim ;
Dertinger, Stefan ;
Layer, Peter ;
Ruenzi, Michael ;
Schneider, Thomas ;
Kachel, Guenther ;
Grueger, Joerg ;
Koellinger, Michael ;
Nagell, Waltraud ;
Goerg, Karl-Josel ;
Wanitschke, Roland ;
Gruss, Hans-Juergen .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2008, 103 (04) :883-893