Visual Prediction Error Spreads Across Object Features in Human Visual Cortex

被引:20
作者
Jiang, Jiefeng [1 ]
Summerfield, Christopher [3 ]
Egner, Tobias [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Duke Univ, Ctr Cognit Neurosci, POB 90999, Durham, NC 27708 USA
[2] Duke Univ, Dept Psychol & Neurosci, Durham, NC 27708 USA
[3] Univ Oxford, Dept Expt Psychol, Oxford OX1 3UD, England
基金
美国国家卫生研究院;
关键词
expectation; feature-based attention; object vision; prediction error; FEATURE BINDING; MACAQUE MONKEY; ATTENTIONAL MODULATION; POPULATION RESPONSES; BAYESIAN-INFERENCE; COGNITIVE STATES; FMRI EVIDENCE; HUMAN BRAIN; FREE-ENERGY; AREA MT;
D O I
10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1546-16.2016
中图分类号
Q189 [神经科学];
学科分类号
071006 ;
摘要
Visual cognition is thought to rely heavily on contextual expectations. Accordingly, previous studies have revealed distinct neural signatures for expected versus unexpected stimuli in visual cortex. However, it is presently unknown how the brain combines multiple concurrent stimulus expectations such as those we have for different features of a familiar object. To understand how an unexpected object feature affects the simultaneous processing of other expected feature(s), we combined human fMRI with a task that independently manipulated expectations for color and motion features of moving-dot stimuli. Behavioral data and neural signals from visual cortex were then interrogated to adjudicate between three possible ways in which prediction error (surprise) in the processing of one feature might affect the concurrent processing of another, expected feature: (1) feature processing may be independent; (2) surprise might "spread"from the unexpected to the expected feature, rendering the entire object unexpected; or (3) pairing a surprising feature with an expected feature might promote the inference that the two features are not in fact part of the same object. To formalize these rival hypotheses, we implemented them in a simple computational model of multifeature expectations. Across a range of analyses, behavior and visual neural signals consistently supported a model that assumes a mixing of prediction error signals across features: surprise in one object feature spreads to its other feature(s), thus rendering the entire object unexpected. These results reveal neurocomputational principles of multifeature expectations and indicate that objects are the unit of selection for predictive vision.
引用
收藏
页码:12746 / 12763
页数:18
相关论文
共 78 条
[31]   Attention Sharpens the Distinction between Expected and Unexpected Percepts in the Visual Brain [J].
Jiang, Jiefeng ;
Summerfield, Christopher ;
Egner, Tobias .
JOURNAL OF NEUROSCIENCE, 2013, 33 (47) :18438-18447
[32]   Explaining Neural Signals in Human Visual Cortex With an Associative Learning Model [J].
Jiang, Jiefeng ;
Schmajuk, Nestor ;
Egner, Tobias .
BEHAVIORAL NEUROSCIENCE, 2012, 126 (04) :575-581
[33]   The spatial transformation of color in the primary visual cortex of the macaque monkey [J].
Johnson, EN ;
Hawken, MJ ;
Shapley, R .
NATURE NEUROSCIENCE, 2001, 4 (04) :409-416
[34]   Decoding the visual and subjective contents of the human brain [J].
Kamitani, Y ;
Tong, F .
NATURE NEUROSCIENCE, 2005, 8 (05) :679-685
[35]   Decoding seen and attended motion directions from activity in the human visual cortex [J].
Kamitani, Yukiyasu ;
Tong, Frank .
CURRENT BIOLOGY, 2006, 16 (11) :1096-1102
[36]  
Kanai R, 2015, PHILOS T R SOC LON B, V370
[37]   Multivariate pattern analysis reveals common neural patterns across individuals during touch observation [J].
Kaplan, Jonas T. ;
Meyer, Kaspar .
NEUROIMAGE, 2012, 60 (01) :204-212
[38]   Sensorimotor Mismatch Signals in Primary Visual Cortex of the Behaving Mouse [J].
Keller, Georg B. ;
Bonhoeffer, Tobias ;
Huebener, Mark .
NEURON, 2012, 74 (05) :809-815
[39]   Object perception as Bayesian inference [J].
Kersten, D ;
Mamassian, P ;
Yuille, A .
ANNUAL REVIEW OF PSYCHOLOGY, 2004, 55 :271-304
[40]   Attention Reverses the Effect of Prediction in Silencing Sensory Signals [J].
Kok, Peter ;
Rahnev, Dobromir ;
Jehee, Janneke F. M. ;
Lau, Hakwan C. ;
de Lange, Floris P. .
CEREBRAL CORTEX, 2012, 22 (09) :2197-2206