Clinical and molecular factors for selection of nivolumab or irinotecan as third-line treatment for advanced gastric cancer

被引:8
作者
Ishii, Takahiro [1 ,2 ]
Kawazoe, Akihito [1 ]
Sasaki, Akinori [1 ]
Mishima, Saori [1 ]
Kentaro, Sawada [1 ]
Nakamura, Yoshiaki [1 ]
Kotani, Daisuke [1 ]
Kuboki, Yasutoshi [1 ]
Taniguchi, Hiroya [1 ]
Kojima, Takashi [1 ]
Doi, Toshihiko [1 ]
Yoshino, Takayuki [1 ]
Kuwata, Takeshi [3 ]
Ishii, Genichiro [2 ,3 ]
Shitara, Kohei [1 ]
机构
[1] Hosp East, Dept Gastroenterol & Gastrointestinal Oncol, Natl Canc Ctr, 6-5-1 Kashiwanoha, Kashiwa, Chiba 2778577, Japan
[2] Juntendo Univ, Grad Sch Med, Courses Adv Clin Res Canc, Tokyo, Japan
[3] Hosp East, Natl Canc Ctr, Dept Pathol & Clin Labs, Kashiwa, Chiba, Japan
关键词
clinical and molecular factors; gastric cancer; irinotecan; nivolumab; third-line or later-line treatment; RANDOMIZED PHASE-III; SUPPORTIVE CARE; DOUBLE-BLIND; CHEMOTHERAPY; PLUS; MONOTHERAPY; METASTASIS; PACLITAXEL; PLATINUM; EFFICACY;
D O I
10.1177/1758835920942377
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Background: The use of nivolumab or irinotecan as the third-line treatment for patients with advanced gastric cancer (AGC) remains controversial. Methods: This study analyzed patients with AGC treated with nivolumab or irinotecan (nivolumab group or irinotecan group, respectively) from May 2016 to April 2019 following two or more previous lines of chemotherapy. Univariate survival analysis was conducted to identify the clinical and molecular factors associated with progression-free survival (PFS). Results: A total of 156 patients (74 treated with nivolumab and 82 treated with irinotecan) were analyzed. The median PFS was 1.9 months in both treatment groups. The median overall survival (OS) was 7.2 and 6.2 months in the nivolumab and irinotecan groups, respectively. Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of 1 or more, liver metastasis, a large tumor size at baseline, and HER2-positive status were associated with a worse PFS in the nivolumab group compared with the irinotecan group. The nivolumab group showed a significantly longer PFS (median 3.1versus2.0 months) and OS (median 12.9versus7.8 months) than the irinotecan group in patients with 0 or 1 of these factors, whereas the irinotecan group showed a significantly longer PFS (median 1.0versus1.8 months) and a trend of longer OS (median 3.9versus6.1 months) in patients with > 2 of these factors. Conclusions: Some clinical and molecular factors were associated with outcomes following nivolumab or irinotecan as the third- or later-line treatment in patients with AGC. These factors must be considered while selecting an optimal treatment option.
引用
收藏
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Third-line systemic treatment versus best supportive care for advanced/metastatic gastric cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis
    Chan, Wing-lok
    Yuen, Kwok-keung
    Siu, Steven Wai-kwan
    Lam, Ka-on
    Kwong, Dora Lai-wan
    [J]. CRITICAL REVIEWS IN ONCOLOGY HEMATOLOGY, 2017, 116 : 68 - 81
  • [22] Clinical Study of Anlotinib as Third-Line or Above Therapy in Patients With Advanced or Metastatic Gastric Cancer: A Multicenter Retrospective Study
    Nie, Caiyun
    He, Yunduan
    Lv, Huifang
    Gao, Ming
    Gao, Xiaohui
    Chen, Beibei
    Xu, Weifeng
    Wang, Jianzheng
    Liu, Yingjun
    Zhao, Jing
    Chen, Xiaobing
    [J]. FRONTIERS IN ONCOLOGY, 2022, 12
  • [23] Irinotecan-containing doublet treatment versus irinotecan monotherapy as second-line choice for advanced gastric cancer
    Yang, Liuting
    Jiang, Xiaoyue
    Yan, Han
    Li, Yingying
    Zhen, Hongchao
    Chang, Bingmei
    Kariminia, Seyed
    Li, Qin
    [J]. BMC GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2018, 18
  • [24] Apatinib combined with PD-1 antibody for third-line or later treatment of advanced gastric cancer
    Cui, Qingli
    Mao, Yuefeng
    Wu, Daoyuan
    Hu, Yanhui
    Ma, Dongyang
    Zhang, LiHan
    Liu, Huaimin
    [J]. FRONTIERS IN ONCOLOGY, 2022, 12
  • [25] Is cetuximab in combination with irinotecan as a third-line treatment for advanced colorectal cancer scientifically justified?
    Krakowska, Magdalena
    Czyzykowski, Rafal
    Potemski, Piotr
    [J]. ONCOLOGY IN CLINICAL PRACTICE, 2016, 12 (06): : 205 - 208
  • [26] Nivolumab versus irinotecan as third- or later-line treatment for advanced gastric cancer: a multi-center retrospective study
    Ryosuke Kumanishi
    Shigenori Kadowaki
    Seiichiro Mitani
    Tomohiro Matsushima
    Takatsugu Ogata
    Yukiya Narita
    Toshiki Masuishi
    Hideaki Bando
    Masahiro Tajika
    Hisateru Yasui
    Hiroki Hara
    Kei Muro
    [J]. International Journal of Clinical Oncology, 2023, 28 : 756 - 763
  • [27] Role of Systemic Treatment for Advanced/Metastatic Gastric Carcinoma in the Third-Line Setting: A Bayesian Network Analysis
    Pan, Wen-Tao
    Zhou, Su-Na
    Pan, Meng-Xian
    Luo, Qiu-Yun
    Zhang, Lin
    Yang, Da-Jun
    Qiu, Miaozhen
    [J]. FRONTIERS IN ONCOLOGY, 2020, 10
  • [28] Irinotecan combined with 5-fluorouracil and leucovorin third-line chemotherapy after failure of fluoropyrimidine, platinum, and taxane in gastric cancer: treatment outcomes and a prognostic model to predict survival
    Kang, Eun Joo
    Im, Seock-Ah
    Oh, Do-Youn
    Han, Sae-Won
    Kim, Jin-Soo
    Choi, In Sil
    Kim, Jin Won
    Kim, Yu Jung
    Kim, Jee Hyun
    Kim, Tae-You
    Lee, Jong Seok
    Bang, Yung-Jue
    Lee, Keun-Wook
    [J]. GASTRIC CANCER, 2013, 16 (04) : 581 - 589
  • [29] Association between UGT1A1 gene polymorphism and safety and efficacy of irinotecan monotherapy as the third-line treatment for advanced gastric cancer
    Toshifumi Yamaguchi
    Satoru Iwasa
    Hirokazu Shoji
    Yoshitaka Honma
    Atsuo Takashima
    Ken Kato
    Tetsuya Hamaguchi
    Kazuhide Higuchi
    Narikazu Boku
    [J]. Gastric Cancer, 2019, 22 : 778 - 784
  • [30] Design of precise third-line therapy for gastric cancer: target or chemotherpy?
    Cho, Jae Yong
    [J]. KOREAN JOURNAL OF INTERNAL MEDICINE, 2013, 28 (03) : 297 - 299