Head-To-Head Comparison of 68Ga-PSMA-11 PET/CT and 99mTc-MDP Bone Scintigraphy for the Detection of Bone Metastases in Patients With Prostate Cancer: A Meta-Analysis

被引:29
作者
Zhao, Gege [1 ]
Ji, Bin [1 ]
机构
[1] Jilin Univ, Dept Nucl Med, China Japan Union Hosp, 126 Xiantai St, Changchun 130033, Peoples R China
基金
美国国家卫生研究院;
关键词
Ga-68-PSMA-11; PET/CT; Tc-99m-MDP bone scintigraphy; bone metastases; diagnostic accuracy; prostate cancer; GUIDELINES; SPECT/CT; SCAN; MRI;
D O I
10.2214/AJR.21.27323
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
BACKGROUND. Bone scintigraphy (BS) using Tc-99m-labeled methylene diphosphonate (Tc-99m-MDP) remains the recommended imaging modality for the detection of bone metastases in patients with prostate cancer (PCa). However, PET/CT using prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA) ligands is increasingly recognized as a means of evaluating disease extent in patients with PCa, including use as a possible stand-alone test in high-risk patients. OBJECTIVE. The purpose of this study is to compare the diagnostic performance of Ga-68-PSMA-11 PET/CT with that of Tc-99m-MDP BS for the detection of bone metastases in patients with PCa. EVIDENCE ACQUISITION. The PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library databases were searched through October 2021 to identify studies reporting a head-to-head comparison of Ga-68-PSMA-11 PET/CT and Tc-99m-MDP BS for the detection of bone metastases in patients with PCa. Only studies with a well-defined reference standard (including various combinations of imaging and/or clinical follow-up) were included. Pooled diagnostic performance was calculated using a bivariate random-effects model, and an AUC was derived for each test from hierarchic summary ROC analysis. The complementary roles of the two tests in identifying bone metastases in patients in whom one of the tests was negative were summarized. EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS. Six studies with 546 patients were included. Pooled sensitivity and specificity, respectively, were 98% (95% CI, 94-99%) and 97% (95% CI, 91-99%) for Ga-68-PSMA-11 PET/CT versus 83% (95% CI, 69-91%) and 68% (95% CI, 41-87%) for Tc-99m-MDP BS. The AUC was 0.99 (95% CI, 0.96-1.00) for Ga-68-PSMA-11 PET/CT and 0.85 (95% CI, 0.81-0.87) for Tc-99m-MDP BS. Among 408 patients from five included studies, Ga-68-PSMA-11 PET/CT correctly identified bone metastases in 43 of 193 patients (22.3%) with negative Tc-99m-MDP BS results, whereas Tc-99m-MDP BS correctly identified bone metastases in four of 210 patients (1.9%) with negative Ga-68-PSMA-11 PET/CT results. CONCLUSION. On a per-patient basis, the diagnostic performance of Ga-68-PSMA-11 PET/CT is superior to that of Tc-99m-MDP BS for the detection of PCa bone metastases. Furthermore, Tc-99m-MDP BS offers limited additional information in patients with negative Ga-68-PSMA-11 PET/CT results. CLINICAL IMPACT. According to current evidence, Tc-99m-MDP BS is highly unlikely to be additive to Ga-68-PSMA-11 PET/CT in identifying bone metastases in patients with PCa.
引用
收藏
页码:386 / 395
页数:10
相关论文
共 52 条
  • [31] Reporting and handling of equivocal imaging findings in diagnostic studies of bone metastasis in prostate cancer
    Petersen, Lars J.
    Johansen, Martin N.
    Strandberg, Jesper
    Stenholt, Louise
    Zacho, Helle D.
    [J]. ACTA RADIOLOGICA, 2020, 61 (08) : 1096 - 1104
  • [32] Total-Body 68Ga-PSMA-11 PET/CT for Bone Metastasis Detection in Prostate Cancer Patients: Potential Impact on Bone Scan Guidelines
    Pomykala, Kelsey L.
    Czernin, Johannes
    Grogan, Tristan R.
    Armstrong, Wesley R.
    Williams, John
    Calais, Jeremie
    [J]. JOURNAL OF NUCLEAR MEDICINE, 2020, 61 (03) : 405 - 411
  • [33] Comparison of bone scintigraphy and 68Ga-PSMA PET for skeletal staging in prostate cancer
    Pyka, Thomas
    Okamoto, Shozo
    Dahlbender, Marielena
    Tauber, Robert
    Retz, Margitta
    Heck, Matthias
    Tamaki, Nagara
    Schwaiger, Markus
    Maurer, Tobias
    Eiber, Matthias
    [J]. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF NUCLEAR MEDICINE AND MOLECULAR IMAGING, 2016, 43 (12) : 2114 - 2121
  • [34] Matched-Pair Comparison of 68Ga-PSMA-11 PET/CT and 18F-PSMA-1007 PET/CT: Frequency of Pitfalls and Detection Efficacy in Biochemical Recurrence After Radical Prostatectomy
    Rauscher, Isabel
    Kroenke, Markus
    Koenig, Michael
    Gafita, Andrei
    Maurer, Tobias
    Horn, Thomas
    Schiller, Kilian
    Weber, Wolfgang
    Eiber, Matthias
    [J]. JOURNAL OF NUCLEAR MEDICINE, 2020, 61 (01) : 51 - 57
  • [35] 68Ga-PSMA PET/CT in the evaluation of bone metastases in prostate cancer
    Sachpekidis, Christos
    Baeumer, P.
    Kopka, K.
    Hadaschik, B. A.
    Hohenfellner, M.
    Kopp-Schneider, A.
    Haberkorn, U.
    Dimitrakopoulou-Strauss, A.
    [J]. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF NUCLEAR MEDICINE AND MOLECULAR IMAGING, 2018, 45 (06) : 904 - 912
  • [36] Preferred reporting items for systematic review and meta-analysis of diagnostic test accuracy studies (PRISMA-DTA): explanation, elaboration, and checklist
    Salameh, Jean-Paul
    Bossuyt, Patrick M.
    McGrath, Trevor A.
    Thombs, Brett D.
    Hyde, Christopher J.
    Macaskill, Petra
    Deeks, Jonathan J.
    Leeflang, Mariska
    Korevaar, Daniel A.
    Whiting, Penny
    Takwoingi, Yemisi
    Reitsma, Johannes B.
    Cohen, Jeremie F.
    Frank, Robert A.
    Hunt, Harriet A.
    Hooft, Lotty
    Rutjes, Anne W. S.
    Willis, Brian H.
    Gatsonis, Constantine
    Levis, Brooke
    Moher, David
    McInnes, Matthew D. F.
    [J]. BMJ-BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2020, 370
  • [37] Clinically Localized Prostate Cancer: AUA/ASTRO/SUO Guideline. Part I: Risk Stratification, Shared Decision Making, and Care Options
    Sanda, Martin G.
    Cadeddu, Jeffrey A.
    Kirkby, Erin
    Chen, Ronald C.
    Crispino, Tony
    Fontanarosa, Joann
    Freedland, Stephen J.
    Greene, Kirsten
    Klotz, Laurence H.
    Makarov, Danil V.
    Nelson, Joel B.
    Rodrigues, George
    Sandler, Howard M.
    Taplin, Mary Ellen
    Treadwell, Jonathan R.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2018, 199 (03) : 683 - 690
  • [38] Does bone scintigraphy still have a role in the era of 68 Ga-PSMA PET/CT in prostate cancer?
    Simsek, Duygu Has
    Sanli, Yasemin
    Civan, Caner
    Engin, Muge Nur
    Isik, Emine Goknur
    Ozkan, Zeynep Gozde
    Kuyumcu, Serkan
    [J]. ANNALS OF NUCLEAR MEDICINE, 2020, 34 (07) : 476 - 485
  • [39] Introduction to diagnostic test accuracy studies
    Sitch, Alice J.
    Dekkers, Olaf M.
    Scholefield, Barnaby R.
    Takwoingi, Yemisi
    [J]. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF ENDOCRINOLOGY, 2021, 184 (02) : E5 - E9
  • [40] Song H, 2021, J NUCL MED