Head-To-Head Comparison of 68Ga-PSMA-11 PET/CT and 99mTc-MDP Bone Scintigraphy for the Detection of Bone Metastases in Patients With Prostate Cancer: A Meta-Analysis

被引:29
作者
Zhao, Gege [1 ]
Ji, Bin [1 ]
机构
[1] Jilin Univ, Dept Nucl Med, China Japan Union Hosp, 126 Xiantai St, Changchun 130033, Peoples R China
基金
美国国家卫生研究院;
关键词
Ga-68-PSMA-11; PET/CT; Tc-99m-MDP bone scintigraphy; bone metastases; diagnostic accuracy; prostate cancer; GUIDELINES; SPECT/CT; SCAN; MRI;
D O I
10.2214/AJR.21.27323
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
BACKGROUND. Bone scintigraphy (BS) using Tc-99m-labeled methylene diphosphonate (Tc-99m-MDP) remains the recommended imaging modality for the detection of bone metastases in patients with prostate cancer (PCa). However, PET/CT using prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA) ligands is increasingly recognized as a means of evaluating disease extent in patients with PCa, including use as a possible stand-alone test in high-risk patients. OBJECTIVE. The purpose of this study is to compare the diagnostic performance of Ga-68-PSMA-11 PET/CT with that of Tc-99m-MDP BS for the detection of bone metastases in patients with PCa. EVIDENCE ACQUISITION. The PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library databases were searched through October 2021 to identify studies reporting a head-to-head comparison of Ga-68-PSMA-11 PET/CT and Tc-99m-MDP BS for the detection of bone metastases in patients with PCa. Only studies with a well-defined reference standard (including various combinations of imaging and/or clinical follow-up) were included. Pooled diagnostic performance was calculated using a bivariate random-effects model, and an AUC was derived for each test from hierarchic summary ROC analysis. The complementary roles of the two tests in identifying bone metastases in patients in whom one of the tests was negative were summarized. EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS. Six studies with 546 patients were included. Pooled sensitivity and specificity, respectively, were 98% (95% CI, 94-99%) and 97% (95% CI, 91-99%) for Ga-68-PSMA-11 PET/CT versus 83% (95% CI, 69-91%) and 68% (95% CI, 41-87%) for Tc-99m-MDP BS. The AUC was 0.99 (95% CI, 0.96-1.00) for Ga-68-PSMA-11 PET/CT and 0.85 (95% CI, 0.81-0.87) for Tc-99m-MDP BS. Among 408 patients from five included studies, Ga-68-PSMA-11 PET/CT correctly identified bone metastases in 43 of 193 patients (22.3%) with negative Tc-99m-MDP BS results, whereas Tc-99m-MDP BS correctly identified bone metastases in four of 210 patients (1.9%) with negative Ga-68-PSMA-11 PET/CT results. CONCLUSION. On a per-patient basis, the diagnostic performance of Ga-68-PSMA-11 PET/CT is superior to that of Tc-99m-MDP BS for the detection of PCa bone metastases. Furthermore, Tc-99m-MDP BS offers limited additional information in patients with negative Ga-68-PSMA-11 PET/CT results. CLINICAL IMPACT. According to current evidence, Tc-99m-MDP BS is highly unlikely to be additive to Ga-68-PSMA-11 PET/CT in identifying bone metastases in patients with PCa.
引用
收藏
页码:386 / 395
页数:10
相关论文
共 52 条
  • [1] Comparison of Bone Uptake in Bone Scan and Ga-68 PSMA PET/CT Images in Patients with Prostate Cancer
    Acar, Emine
    Bekis, Recep
    Polack, Berna
    [J]. CURRENT MEDICAL IMAGING, 2019, 15 (06) : 589 - 594
  • [2] Clinical insignificance of [18F]PSMA-1007 avid non-specific bone lesions: a retrospective evaluation
    Arnfield, Evyn G.
    Thomas, Paul A.
    Roberts, Matthew J.
    Pelecanos, Anita M.
    Ramsay, Stuart C.
    Lin, Charles Y.
    Latter, Melissa J.
    Garcia, Peter L.
    Pattison, David A.
    [J]. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF NUCLEAR MEDICINE AND MOLECULAR IMAGING, 2021, 48 (13) : 4495 - 4507
  • [3] Bone scintigraphy as a gatekeeper for the detection of bone metastases in patients with prostate cancer: comparison with Ga-68 PSMA PET/CT
    Caglar, Meltem
    Tuncel, Murat
    Yildiz, Egemen
    Karabulut, Erdem
    [J]. ANNALS OF NUCLEAR MEDICINE, 2020, 34 (12) : 932 - 941
  • [4] 68Ga-PSMA-11 NDA Approval: A Novel and Successful Academic Partnership
    Carlucci, Giuseppe
    Ippisch, Robin
    Slavik, Roger
    Mishoe, Ashley
    Blecha, Joseph
    Zhu, Shaojun
    [J]. JOURNAL OF NUCLEAR MEDICINE, 2021, 62 (02) : 149 - 155
  • [5] NCCN Guidelines Updates: Prostate Cancer and Prostate Cancer Early Detection
    Carroll, Peter H.
    Mohler, James L.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THE NATIONAL COMPREHENSIVE CANCER NETWORK, 2018, 16 (05): : 620 - 623
  • [6] E-PSMA: the EANM standardized reporting guidelines v1.0 for PSMA-PET
    Ceci, Francesco
    Oprea-Lager, Daniela E.
    Emmett, Louise
    Adam, Judit A.
    Bomanji, Jamshed
    Czernin, Johannes
    Eiber, Matthias
    Haberkorn, Uwe
    Hofman, Michael S.
    Hope, Thomas A.
    Kumar, Rakesh
    Rowe, Steven P.
    Schwarzenboeck, Sarah M.
    Fanti, Stefano
    Herrmann, Ken
    [J]. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF NUCLEAR MEDICINE AND MOLECULAR IMAGING, 2021, 48 (05) : 1626 - 1638
  • [7] Prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA)-based imaging in localized and advanced prostate cancer: a narrative review
    de Kouchkovsky, Ivan
    Aggarwal, Rahul
    Hope, Thomas A.
    [J]. TRANSLATIONAL ANDROLOGY AND UROLOGY, 2021, 10 (07) : 3130 - 3143
  • [8] Intraindividual Comparison of 18F-PSMA-1007 with Renally Excreted PSMA Ligands for PSMA PET Imaging in Patients with Relapsed Prostate Cancer
    Dietlein, Felix
    Kobe, Carsten
    Hohberg, Melanie
    Zlatopolskiy, Boris D.
    Krapf, Philipp
    Endepols, Heike
    Taeger, Philipp
    Hammes, Jochen
    Heidenreich, Axel
    Persigehl, Thorsten
    Neumaier, Bernd
    Drzezga, Alexander
    Dietlein, Markus
    [J]. JOURNAL OF NUCLEAR MEDICINE, 2020, 61 (05) : 729 - 734
  • [9] Can Ga-68 PSMA PET/CT replace conventional imaging modalities for primary lymph node and bone staging of prostate cancer?
    Esen, Tarik
    Kilic, Mert
    Seymen, Hulya
    Acar, Omer
    Demirkol, Mehmet Onur
    [J]. EUROPEAN UROLOGY FOCUS, 2020, 6 (02): : 218 - 220
  • [10] Freedman-Cass D, NCCN Guidelines Version 3.2022: Prostate Cancer