Effects of fatigue on attention and vigilance as measured with a modified attention network test

被引:11
作者
Feltmate, Brett B. T. [1 ]
Hurst, Austin J. [2 ]
Klein, Raymond M. [1 ]
机构
[1] Dalhousie Univ, Dept Psychol & Neurosci, Halifax, NS, Canada
[2] Univ Waterloo, Dept Psychol, Waterloo, ON, Canada
基金
加拿大自然科学与工程研究理事会;
关键词
Attention; Vigilance; Fatigue; Attention networks test; Human factors; SLEEP-DEPRIVATION; INDEPENDENCE; SENSITIVITY;
D O I
10.1007/s00221-020-05902-y
中图分类号
Q189 [神经科学];
学科分类号
071006 ;
摘要
As part of a larger study on the effects of fatigue on various attentional and behavioural measures, we had participants complete a modified version of Luna et al.'s (J Neurosci Methods 306:77-87, Luna et al., J Neurosci Methods 306:77-87, 2018) ANTI-Vea task (mANTI-Vea) at the beginning and end (pre/post) of each of two 8-h testing sessions. Between these administrations of the mANTI-Vea our participants spent similar to 6 h performing an intervening task. Our intent in this project was two-fold: first, to replicate the pattern of effects reported in Luna et al.'s original presentation of the ANTI-Vea; second, to assay the impact of fatigue on vigilance and attention by observing shifts in mANTI-Vea performance as a function of time on task and before versus after the intervening task. With time-on-task (the mANTI-Vea is divided into six sub-blocks) we observed that participants became increasingly conservative in their biases to respond towards infrequent targets, showed a decline in sensitivity, and lapsed in responding in the psychomotor vigilance task with greater frequency. In the pre/post comparison, we observed an increase in the proportion of lapses, but not in participants' response biases. Attentional network scores were found to be somewhat insensitive to our fatigue manipulations; the effect of time-on-task was only significant for orienting scores on RT, and our pre/post comparison was only significant for RT derived executive functioning scores.
引用
收藏
页码:2507 / 2519
页数:13
相关论文
共 31 条
[11]   Attention-related EEG markers in adult ADHD [J].
Hasler, Roland ;
Perroud, Nader ;
Meziane, Hadj Boumediene ;
Herrmann, Francois ;
Prada, Paco ;
Giannakopoulos, Panteleimon ;
Deiber, Marie-Pierre .
NEUROPSYCHOLOGIA, 2016, 87 :120-133
[12]   TOWARDS A MODEL OF THE MINDS EYES MOVEMENT [J].
JONIDES, J .
CANADIAN JOURNAL OF PSYCHOLOGY-REVUE CANADIENNE DE PSYCHOLOGIE, 1980, 34 (02) :103-112
[13]   Detecting outliers: Do not use standard deviation around the mean, use absolute deviation around the median [J].
Leys, Christophe ;
Ley, Christophe ;
Klein, Olivier ;
Bernard, Philippe ;
Licata, Laurent .
JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY, 2013, 49 (04) :764-766
[14]   Sleep deprivation and vigilant attention [J].
Lim, Julian ;
Dinges, David F. .
MOLECULAR AND BIOPHYSICAL MECHANISMS OF AROUSAL, ALERTNESS, AND ATTENTION, 2008, 1129 :305-322
[15]   The effect of a family-based mindfulness intervention on children with attention deficit and hyperactivity symptoms and their parents: design and rationale for a randomized, controlled clinical trial (Study protocol) [J].
Lo, Herman H. M. ;
Wong, Samuel Y. S. ;
Wong, Janet Y. H. ;
Wong, Simpson W. L. ;
Yeung, Jerf W. K. .
BMC PSYCHIATRY, 2016, 16
[16]   Disturbance of attention network functions in Chinese healthy older adults: an intra-individual perspective [J].
Lu, Hanna ;
Fung, Ada W. T. ;
Chan, Sandra S. M. ;
Lam, Linda C. W. .
INTERNATIONAL PSYCHOGERIATRICS, 2016, 28 (02) :291-301
[17]   Effects of age on attention level: changes in performance between the ages of 12 and 90 [J].
Lufi, Dubi ;
Haimov, Iris .
AGING NEUROPSYCHOLOGY AND COGNITION, 2019, 26 (06) :904-919
[18]   A High -Definition tDCS and EEG study on attention and vigilance: Brain stimulation mitigates the executive but not the arousal vigilance decrement [J].
Luna, Fernando G. ;
Roman-Caballero, Rafael ;
Barttfeld, Pablo ;
Lupianez, Juan ;
Martin-Arevalo, Elisa .
NEUROPSYCHOLOGIA, 2020, 142
[19]   VIGILANCE [J].
MACKWORTH, NH .
NATURE, 1956, 178 (4547) :1375-1377
[20]  
Matsangas Panagiotis, 2019, Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting, V63, P797, DOI 10.1177/1071181319631144