Comparison of radiation doses between cone beam CT and multi detector CT: TLD measurements

被引:35
作者
Kim, Sangroh [2 ]
Yoshizumi, Terry T. [1 ]
Toncheva, Greta [1 ]
Yoo, Sua [3 ]
Yin, Fang-Fang [3 ]
机构
[1] Duke Univ, Dept Radiol, Med Ctr, Durham, NC 27710 USA
[2] Duke Univ, Med Phys Grad Program, Durham, NC 27705 USA
[3] Duke Univ, Dept Radiat Oncol, Med Ctr, Durham, NC 27710 USA
关键词
D O I
10.1093/rpd/ncn305
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
In recent years, wide beam computed tomography (CT) technique has become standard in radiation oncology whereas there is little information about radiation dose assessments for the technique. A point dose measurement method was employed to assess the radiation doses of cone beams CT (CBCT) and multi detectors CT (MDCT). The radiation doses of both modalities were measured using thermoluminescence dosemeters (TLDs) in head and body CT phantoms. Four TLD chips were placed at the centre and each peripheral channel to measure the doses. From the measurements, the weighted CT dose index for CBCT (CTDIwCBCT) and volume CT dose index for MDCT (CTDIvolMDCT) were derived. In the results, the CTDIwCBCT was 89.7 +/- 4.0 mGy and the CTDIvolMDCT was 137.0 +/- 7.4 mGy for the head scan. For the body scan, they were 37.9 +/- 1.4 and 74.3 +/- 5.3 mGy, respectively. In conclusion, CTDIwCBCT for the head scan was 35% lower than CTDIvolMDCT, and CTDIwCBCT for the body scan was also 49% lower than CTDIvolMDCT.
引用
收藏
页码:339 / 345
页数:7
相关论文
共 15 条
[1]   The trouble with CTDI100 [J].
Boone, John M. .
MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2007, 34 (04) :1364-1371
[2]  
Dixon RL, 2003, MED PHYS, V30, P1272, DOI 10.1118/1.1576952
[3]  
Hendee W. R., 1979, MED RAD PHYS, P171
[4]   Radiation dose to the fetus from body MDCT during early gestation. [J].
Hurwitz, LM ;
Yoshizumi, T ;
Reiman, RE ;
Goodman, PC ;
Paulson, EK ;
Frush, DP ;
Toncheva, G ;
Nguyen, G ;
Barnes, L .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY, 2006, 186 (03) :871-876
[5]   Cone-beam computed tomography with a flat-panel imager: Initial performance characterization [J].
Jaffray, DA ;
Siewerdsen, JH .
MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2000, 27 (06) :1311-1323
[6]   Measurement of half-value layer in x-ray CT: A comparison of two noninvasive techniques [J].
Kruger, RL ;
McCollough, CH ;
Zink, FE .
MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2000, 27 (08) :1915-1919
[7]   Enlarged longitudinal dose profiles in cone-beam CT and the need for modified dosimetry [J].
Mori, S ;
Endo, M ;
Nishizawa, K ;
Tsunoo, T ;
Aoyama, T ;
Fujiwara, H ;
Murase, K .
MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2005, 32 (04) :1061-1069
[8]   The management of imaging dose during image-guided radiotherapy: Report of the AAPM Task Group 75 [J].
Murphy, Martin J. ;
Balter, James ;
Balter, Stephen ;
BenComo, Jose A., Jr. ;
Das, Indra J. ;
Jiang, Steve B. ;
Ma, C.-M. ;
Olivera, Gustavo H. ;
Rodebaugh, Raymond F. ;
Ruchala, Kenneth J. ;
Shirato, Hiroki ;
Yin, Fang-Fang .
MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2007, 34 (10) :4041-4063
[9]   Novel methods of measuring single scan dose profiles and cumulative dose in CT [J].
Nakonechny, KD ;
Fallone, BG ;
Rathee, S .
MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2005, 32 (01) :98-109
[10]   A METHOD FOR DESCRIBING THE DOSES DELIVERED BY TRANSMISSION-X-RAY COMPUTED-TOMOGRAPHY [J].
SHOPE, TB ;
GAGNE, RM ;
JOHNSON, GC .
MEDICAL PHYSICS, 1981, 8 (04) :488-495