Cutaneous adverse drug reaction profile in a tertiary care out patient setting in Eastern India

被引:30
作者
Abanti, Saha [1 ]
Kanti, Das Nilay [1 ]
Avijit, Hazra [2 ]
Chandra, Gharami Ramesh [1 ]
Nath, Chowdhury Satyendra [1 ]
Kanti, Datta Pijush [1 ]
机构
[1] Postgrad Inst Med Educ & Res, Dept Dermatol, Coll Med, Kolkata, India
[2] Postgrad Inst Med Educ & Res, Dept Pharmacol, Kolkata, India
关键词
Causality assessment; cutaneous adverse drug reaction; dermatologic pharmacology; pharmacovigilance; DERMATOLOGY; UNIVERSITY;
D O I
10.4103/0253-7613.103304
中图分类号
R9 [药学];
学科分类号
1007 ;
摘要
Background: Cutaneous adverse drug reactions (CADR) are the most frequent of all manifestations of drug sensitivity and manifest with varied and diverse morphology. Aims: To study the prevalence and clinical spectrum of CADR among patients attending outpatient department (OPD) in a tertiary care hospital. Materials and Methods: An observational study was undertaken over a 1-year period in dermatology OPD of a tertiary care teaching hospital in Eastern India. Patients presenting with suspected drug-related cutaneous lesions were included if drug identity could be ascertained. Clinical profiling was done. Drug history was recorded in a format specified in Indian National Pharmacovigilance Programme and causality assessment carried out as per World Health Organization-Uppsala Monitoring Centre (WHO-UMC) criteria. Results: Commonest CADR in our study was morbilliform eruption (30.18), followed by fixed drug eruption (24.52), Stevens-Johnson syndrome (SJS)-Toxic epidermal necrolysis (TEN) and overlap of two (24.50), exfoliative dermatitis (7.54), urticaria (5.6), phototoxic drug reaction (3.8), pityriasis rosea-like eruptions (1.89), and severe mucositis (1.80). Drugs implicated were sulfonamides (17), fixed-dose combinations of fluoroquinolones with nitroimidazoles (11.30), analgesics (11.30), antiepileptics (11.30), beta-lactam antibiotics (9.40), fluoroquinolones alone (7.50), allopurinol (7.50), and azithromycin (5.70). Reaction latency varied from 1 to 43 days. Causality assessment was certain and probable for 18.9 and 41.5 of the reactions, respectively, and reactions were serious in 33.96 (95 confidence interval 21.21-46.71). Conclusions: Cutaneous adverse drug reaction profile in this study is similar in many ways to studies conducted earlier in India. Incidence of life-threatening reactions like SJS-TEN was higher compared with studies conducted abroad. Reaction time and lesion patterns are helpful in identifying an offending drug in the setting of multiple drug therapy.
引用
收藏
页码:792 / 797
页数:6
相关论文
共 18 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 2005, US WHO UMC SYST STAN
[2]   The prevalence of acute cutaneous drug reactions in a Scandinavian university hospital [J].
Borch, Jakob E. ;
Andersen, Klaus E. ;
Bindslev-Jensen, Carsten .
ACTA DERMATO-VENEREOLOGICA, 2006, 86 (06) :518-522
[3]  
Chatterjee S., 2006, Indian Journal of Pharmacology, V38, P429
[4]  
Ghosh S., 2006, Indian Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences, V68, P212
[5]  
Hede SS, 1987, INDIAN J PHARM, V19, P145
[6]   Comprehensive hospital drug monitoring (CHDM): Adverse skin reactions, a 20-year survey [J].
Hunziker, T ;
Kunzi, UP ;
Braunschweig, S ;
Zehnder, D ;
Hoigne, R .
ALLERGY, 1997, 52 (04) :388-393
[7]  
Jhaj R, 1999, Indian J Dermatol Venereol Leprol, V65, P14
[8]  
Kacalak-Rzepka Anna, 2008, Roczniki Pomorskiej Akademii Medycznej w Szczecinie, V54, P52
[9]  
Nayak Surajit, 2008, Indian J Dermatol, V53, P2, DOI 10.4103/0019-5154.39732
[10]   Clinical study of cutaneous drug eruptions in 200 patients [J].
Patel, Raksha M. ;
Marfatia, Y. S. .
INDIAN JOURNAL OF DERMATOLOGY VENEREOLOGY & LEPROLOGY, 2008, 74 (04) :430