"Fool me once, shame on you... then, I learn." An examination of information disclosure in social networking sites

被引:30
作者
Osatuyi, Babajide [1 ]
Passerini, Katia [2 ]
Ravarini, Aurelio [3 ]
Grandhi, Sukeshini A. [4 ]
机构
[1] Penn State Univ, Dept Management Informat Syst, Sam & Irene Black Sch Business, 5101 Jordan Rd, Erie, PA 16563 USA
[2] St Johns Univ, 8000 Utopia Pkwy,St Augustine Hall,Second Floor, Queens, NY 11439 USA
[3] Univ Carlo Cattaneo LIUC, Cso Matteotti 22, I-21053 Castellanza, VA, Italy
[4] Eastern Connecticut State Univ, Dept Business Adm, Business Informat Syst, 3 Windham St, Willimantic, CT 06226 USA
关键词
Information sharing; Shallow disdosure; Deep disclosure; Social networking sites; Social penetration theory; Communication privacy management theory; STRUCTURAL EQUATION MODELS; SELF-DISCLOSURE; COMPUTER ANXIETY; PRIVACY; FACEBOOK; MEDIA; TECHNOLOGY; ACCEPTANCE; BEHAVIORS; TESTS;
D O I
10.1016/j.chb.2018.01.018
中图分类号
B84 [心理学];
学科分类号
04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
This study investigates factors that affect user decisions on which information to share, and specifically whether and how to disclose sensitive personal information, when using social networking sites (SNSs). The determinants of personal information disclosure (self-disclosure) are identified using a framework that combines communication privacy management and social penetration theories. Communication privacy management theory is applied to identify which rules guide users' sharing of personal information. Social penetration theory is used to understand personal information disclosure approaches deep and shallow that people employ on SNSs. Structural equation modeling was used to analyze data from 315 Facebook users who were also undergraduate students. Results show that individuals self disclose more on SNSs when they know how to coordinate disclosure boundaries, and particularly when they have learned from prior privacy infringements. While types of relationships are important in determining self-disclosure approaches, SNSs users who have experienced a privacy breach follow different privacy coordination rules compared with those who have not experienced such an incident. Our results present an interesting twist in which the "fooled once" users show higher levels of information sharing at all levels. These users have learned their lessons and their way through privacy management options, eventually leading to a higher self-disclosure. (C) 2018 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:73 / 86
页数:14
相关论文
共 68 条
[31]   Trust and TAM in online shopping: An integrated model [J].
Gefen, D ;
Karahanna, E ;
Straub, DW .
MIS QUARTERLY, 2003, 27 (01) :51-90
[32]  
Gefen D., 2000, Communications of the Association for Information Systems, V4, DOI [10.17705/1cais.00407, 10.17705/1CAIS.00407, DOI 10.17705/1CAIS.00407]
[33]  
Goel L, 2011, MIS QUART, V35, P749
[34]   COMPUTER ANXIETY IN MANAGEMENT - MYTH OR REALITY [J].
HOWARD, GS ;
SMITH, RD .
COMMUNICATIONS OF THE ACM, 1986, 29 (07) :611-615
[35]   A dual privacy decision model for online social networks [J].
James, Tabitha L. ;
Warkentin, Merrill ;
Collignon, Stephane E. .
INFORMATION & MANAGEMENT, 2015, 52 (08) :893-908
[36]   Online social networks: why we disclose [J].
Krasnova, Hanna ;
Spiekermann, Sarah ;
Koroleva, Ksenia ;
Hildebrand, Thomas .
JOURNAL OF INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY, 2010, 25 (02) :109-125
[37]   THE DYADIC TRUST SCALE - TOWARD UNDERSTANDING INTERPERSONAL-TRUST IN CLOSE RELATIONSHIPS [J].
LARZELERE, RE ;
HUSTON, TL .
JOURNAL OF MARRIAGE AND THE FAMILY, 1980, 42 (03) :595-604
[38]   An empirical analysis of users' privacy disclosure behaviors on social network sites [J].
Li, Kai ;
Lin, Zhangxi ;
Wang, Xiaowen .
INFORMATION & MANAGEMENT, 2015, 52 (07) :882-891
[39]   Assessing the mediating role of online social capital between social support and instant messaging usage [J].
Lin, Chieh-Peng .
ELECTRONIC COMMERCE RESEARCH AND APPLICATIONS, 2011, 10 (01) :105-114
[40]   Common Method Bias in Marketing: Causes, Mechanisms, and Procedural Remedies [J].
MacKenzie, Scott B. ;
Podsakoff, Philip M. .
JOURNAL OF RETAILING, 2012, 88 (04) :542-555