Contemporary constructivist practices in higher education settings and academic motivational factors

被引:0
作者
Alt, Dorit [1 ]
机构
[1] Kinneret Coll Sea Of Galilee, Sea Of Galilee, Israel
关键词
constructivist learning; academic self-efficacy; academic motivation; LEARNING ENVIRONMENTS; SELF-EFFICACY; QUESTIONNAIRE; BELIEFS;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
G40 [教育学];
学科分类号
040101 ; 120403 ;
摘要
This study was aimed at assessing the relationships between college students' pre-entry factors, self-efficacy and motivation for learning, and the perceived constructivist learning in traditional lecture-based courses and seminars (SM). The study included 411 undergraduate third-year college students. Several scales were administered to the participants: The Constructivist Learning in Higher Education Settings scale (CLHES) aimed at measuring students' perceptions of occurrences of contemporary constructivist practices in learning environments, along three dimensions: constructive activity, teacher student interaction and social activity; the Academic Motivation Scale - College (CEGEP); and the Motivated Strategies for Learning Questionnaire (MSLQ). Regression analysis main results showed that the constructive activity and teacher- student interaction factors were positively correlated. The teacher- student interaction variable was highly effective in enhancing intrinsic motivation for learning which in turn, contributed primarily to academic self-efficacy. The motivational factors were not solely affected by the learning environment perception but were also informed, to some extent, by several pre-entry factors. Multivariate analysis of covariance results have corroborated the research hypothesis, indicating that students perceive seminar learning environments as more constructivist when compared with lecture-based course perceptions. Implications of these findings and directions for future research are discussed.
引用
收藏
页码:374 / 399
页数:26
相关论文
共 52 条
[31]   Relationships between students' conceptions of constructivist learning and their regulation and processing strategies [J].
Loyens, Sofie M. M. ;
Rikers, Remy M. J. P. ;
Schmidt, Henk G. .
INSTRUCTIONAL SCIENCE, 2008, 36 (5-6) :445-462
[32]  
Lund A, 2011, NEW PERSP LEARN INST, P206
[33]  
McDougall J, 2015, AUST J ADULT LEARN, V55, P94
[34]  
McGrath D.L., 2007, Australian Journal of Adult Learning, V47, P228
[35]   Elementary Science Students' Motivation and Learning Strategy Use: Constructivist Classroom Contextual Factors in a Life Science Laboratory and a Traditional Classroom [J].
Milner, Andrea R. ;
Templin, Mark A. ;
Czerniak, Charlene M. .
JOURNAL OF SCIENCE TEACHER EDUCATION, 2011, 22 (02) :151-170
[36]   Influence of redesigning a learning environment on student perceptions and learning strategies [J].
Nijhuis J.F.H. ;
Segers M.S.R. ;
Gijselaers W.H. .
Learning Environments Research, 2005, 8 (1) :67-93
[37]  
Pellegrino J.W., 2012, Education for life and work: Developing transferable knowledge and skills in the 21st century
[38]  
Perret-Clermont AN, 2011, NEW PERSP LEARN INST, P87
[39]   RELIABILITY AND PREDICTIVE-VALIDITY OF THE MOTIVATED STRATEGIES FOR LEARNING QUESTIONNAIRE (MSLQ) [J].
PINTRICH, PR ;
SMITH, DAF ;
GARCIA, T ;
MCKEACHIE, WJ .
EDUCATIONAL AND PSYCHOLOGICAL MEASUREMENT, 1993, 53 (03) :801-813
[40]   Eta squared and partial eta squared as measures of effect size in educational research [J].
Richardson, John T. E. .
EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH REVIEW, 2011, 6 (02) :135-147