Predicting barriers to primary care for patients with disabilities: A mixed methods study of practice administrators

被引:14
作者
Pharr, Jennifer [1 ]
Chino, Michelle [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Nevada, Sch Community Hlth Sci, Dept Environm & Occupat Hlth, Las Vegas, NV 89154 USA
关键词
Americans with Disabilities Act; Patients with disabilities; Structural barriers; Practice administrators; PREVENTIVE SERVICES; HEALTH-CARE; PHYSICAL-DISABILITIES; MOBILITY IMPAIRMENTS; MEDICAL-STUDENTS; PEOPLE; WOMEN; ACCESSIBILITY; ACCESS; BREAST;
D O I
10.1016/j.dhjo.2012.11.003
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: People with disabilities continue to be identified as a group who experience disparate health/health care. They are less likely to engage in some health care services. Structural barriers are often identified as one of the reasons for the underutilization of some health care services by people with disabilities. However, to date no study has been conducted to understand why structural barriers persist twenty years after the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) became law. Objectives: We examined the relationship between primary care practice administrators' knowledge of the ADA and the number of accessibility barriers that patients with mobility disabilities might encounter. Methods: Primary care practice administrators who were members of a medical management organization were surveyed between December 20, 2011, and January 17, 2012. A mixed methods research design was employed. Data were analyzed using a Guttman scale, linear and multiple linear regression. Results: ADA knowledge questions conformed to a valid Guttman scale. There was a significant inverse relationship between practice administrators' knowledge of the ADA and the number of barriers reported in their clinics. Age of the administrators and buildings built before 1993 were also significant predictors of the number of barriers. Conclusion: This study helps to identify medical practices that are more likely to have access barriers and have the greatest need for ADA compliance interventions. Results from this study highlight practice administrators' need for specific knowledge of the ADA as it applies to their medical practice. Efforts are needed to improve disability training for health professionals. (C) 2013 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:116 / 123
页数:8
相关论文
共 56 条
[1]   Evidence of self-report bias in assessing adherence to guidelines [J].
Adams, AS ;
Soumerai, SB ;
Lomas, J ;
Ross-Degnan, D .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL FOR QUALITY IN HEALTH CARE, 1999, 11 (03) :187-192
[2]  
[Anonymous], PUBLIC HLTH REP
[3]  
[Anonymous], BULLETIN
[4]  
[Anonymous], 2010, AM DIS ACT ACC MED C
[5]  
[Anonymous], 2008, Health behaviour and health education: theory, research and practice
[6]  
[Anonymous], DISABIL HLTH J
[7]  
[Anonymous], 2005, DISABIL STUD Q
[8]  
[Anonymous], FINDINGS REPROD HLTH
[9]  
[Anonymous], NEVADA J PUBLIC HLTH
[10]  
[Anonymous], CHECKL EX FAC