TeamGAINS: a tool for structured debriefings for simulation-based team trainings

被引:125
作者
Kolbe, Michaela [1 ]
Weiss, Mona [1 ]
Grote, Gudela [1 ]
Knauth, Axel [2 ]
Dambach, Micha [2 ]
Spahn, Donat R. [2 ]
Grande, Bastian [2 ]
机构
[1] ETH, Dept Management Technol & Econ, Technol Grp, CH-8092 Zurich, Switzerland
[2] Univ Zurich Hosp, Inst Anaesthesiol, CH-8091 Zurich, Switzerland
基金
瑞士国家科学基金会;
关键词
PSYCHOLOGICAL SAFETY; HEALTH-CARE; DELIBERATE PRACTICE; ANESTHESIA TEAMS; REFLECTING TEAM; PERFORMANCE; MANAGEMENT; WORK; GUIDELINES; ACQUISITION;
D O I
10.1136/bmjqs-2012-000917
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
Background Improving patient safety by training teams to successfully manage emergencies is a major concern in healthcare. Most current trainings use simulation of emergency situations to practice and reflect on relevant clinical and behavioural skills. We developed TeamGAINS, a hybrid, structured debriefing tool for simulation-based team trainings in healthcare that integrates three different debriefing approaches: guided team self-correction, advocacy-inquiry and systemic-constructivist techniques. Methods TeamGAINS was administered during simulation-based trainings for clinical and behavioural skills for anaesthesia staff. One of the four daily scenarios involved all trainees, whereas the remaining three scenarios each involved only two trainees with the others observing them. Training instructors were senior anaesthesiologists and psychologists. To determine debriefing quality, we used a post-test-only (debriefing quality) and a pre-post-test (psychological safety, leader inclusiveness), no-control-group design. After each debriefing all trainees completed a self-report debriefing quality scale which we developed based on the Debriefing Assessment for Simulation in Healthcare and the Observational Structured Assessment of Debriefing. Perceived psychological safety and leader inclusiveness were measured before trainees' first (premeasure) and after their last debriefing (postmeasure) at which time trainees' reactions to the overall training were measured as well. Results Four senior anaesthetists, 29 residents and 28 nurses participated in a total of 40 debriefings resulting in 235 evaluations. Utility of debriefings was evaluated as highly positive. Pre-post comparisons revealed that psychological safety and leader inclusiveness significantly increased after the debriefings. Conclusions The results indicate that TeamGAINS could provide a useful debriefing tool for training anaesthesia staff on all levels of work experience. By combining state-of-the-art debriefing methods and integrating systemic-constructivist techniques, TeamGAINS has the potential to allow for a surfacing, reflecting on and changing of the dynamics of team interactions. Further research is necessary to systematically compare the effects of TeamGAINS' components on the debriefing itself and on trainees' changes in attitudes and behaviours.
引用
收藏
页码:541 / 553
页数:13
相关论文
共 81 条
[1]   Effectiveness of a simulator in training anesthesiology residents (Reprinted from Journal of Medical Education, vol 44, pg 515-519, 1969) [J].
Abrahamson, S ;
Denson, JS ;
Wolf, RM .
QUALITY & SAFETY IN HEALTH CARE, 2004, 13 (05) :395-397
[2]   The simulated operating theatre: comprehensive training for surgical teams [J].
Aggarwal, R ;
Undre, S ;
Moorthy, K ;
Vincent, C ;
Darzi, A .
QUALITY & SAFETY IN HEALTH CARE, 2004, 13 :I27-I32
[3]   Identifying best practice guidelines for debriefing in surgery: a tri-continental study [J].
Ahmed, Maria ;
Sevdalis, Nick ;
Paige, John ;
Paragi-Gururaja, Ram ;
Nestel, Debra ;
Arora, Sonal .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2012, 203 (04) :523-529
[4]   A meta-analysis of the relations among training criteria [J].
Alliger, GM ;
Tannenbaum, SI ;
Bennett, W ;
Traver, H ;
Shotland, A .
PERSONNEL PSYCHOLOGY, 1997, 50 (02) :341-358
[5]   THE REFLECTING TEAM - DIALOG AND META-DIALOG IN CLINICAL-WORK [J].
ANDERSEN, T .
FAMILY PROCESS, 1987, 26 (04) :415-428
[6]   HUMAN SYSTEMS AS LINGUISTIC SYSTEMS - PRELIMINARY AND EVOLVING IDEAS ABOUT THE IMPLICATIONS FOR CLINICAL THEORY [J].
ANDERSON, H ;
GOOLISHIAN, HA .
FAMILY PROCESS, 1988, 27 (04) :371-393
[7]  
[Anonymous], 1987, TRAINING DEV HDB GUI
[8]   Debriefing in Simulated-Based Learning Facilitating a Reflective Discussion [J].
Arafeh, Julie M. R. ;
Hansen, Sara Snyder ;
Nichols, Amy .
JOURNAL OF PERINATAL & NEONATAL NURSING, 2010, 24 (04) :302-311
[9]   Objective Structured Assessment of Debriefing Bringing Science to the Art of Debriefing in Surgery [J].
Arora, Sonal ;
Ahmed, Maria ;
Paige, John ;
Nestel, Debra ;
Runnacles, Jane ;
Hull, Louise ;
Darzi, Ara ;
Sevdalis, Nick .
ANNALS OF SURGERY, 2012, 256 (06) :982-988
[10]   Bridging the communication gap in the operating room with medical team training [J].
Awad, SS ;
Fagan, SP ;
Bellows, C ;
Albo, D ;
Green-Rashad, B ;
De La Garza, M ;
Berger, DH .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2005, 190 (05) :770-774