A comparative study on conventional and advanced exergetic analyses of geothermal district heating systems based on actual operational data

被引:37
作者
Hepbasli, Arif [1 ]
Kecebas, Ali [2 ]
机构
[1] Yasar Univ, Fac Engn, Dept Energy Syst Engn, TR-35100 Izmir, Turkey
[2] Mugla Sitki Kocman Univ, Fac Technol, Dept Energy Syst Engn, Mugla, Turkey
关键词
Geothermal energy; District heating system; Exergy destruction; Conventional exergetic analysis; Advanced exergetic analysis; Buildings; CYCLE POWER-PLANT; TURKEY; PERFORMANCE; BALCOVA; COSTS; IZMIR;
D O I
10.1016/j.enbuild.2013.02.019
中图分类号
TU [建筑科学];
学科分类号
0813 ;
摘要
This paper comparatively evaluates exergy destructions of a geothermal district heating system (GDHS) using both conventional and advanced exergetic analysis methods to identify the potential for improvement and the interactions among the components. As a real case study, the Afyon GDHS in Afyonkarahisar, Turkey, is considered based on actual operational data. For the first time, advanced exergetic analysis is applied to the GDHSs, in which the exergy destruction rate within each component is split into unavoidable/avoidable and endogenous/exogenous parts. The results indicate that the interconnections among all the components are not very strong. Thus, one should focus on how to reduce the internal inefficiency (destruction) rates of the components. The highest priority for improvement in the advanced exergetic analysis is in the re-injection pump (PM-IX), while it is the heat exchanger (HEX-III) in the conventional analysis. In addition, there is a substantial influence on the overall system as the total avoidable exergy destruction rate of the heat exchanger (HEX-V) has the highest value. On the overall system basis, the value for the conventional exergetic efficiency is determined to be 29.29% while that for the modified exergetic efficiency is calculated to be 34.46% through improving the overall components. (c) 2013 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:193 / 201
页数:9
相关论文
共 31 条
[1]   Exergoeconomic evaluation on the optimum heating circuit system of Simav geothermal district heating system [J].
Arslan, Oguz ;
Ozgur, M. Arif ;
Kose, Ramazan ;
Tugcu, Abtullah .
ENERGY AND BUILDINGS, 2009, 41 (12) :1325-1333
[2]  
Bejan A, 1996, THERMAL DESIGN OPTIM
[3]   Conventional and advanced exergoenvironmental analysis of a steam methane reforming reactor for hydrogen production [J].
Boyano, A. ;
Morosuk, T. ;
Blanco-Marigorta, A. M. ;
Tsatsaronis, G. .
JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2012, 20 (01) :152-160
[4]   Avoidable thermodynamic inefficiencies and costs in an externally fired combined cycle power plant [J].
Cziesla, F ;
Tsatsaronis, G ;
Gao, ZL .
ENERGY, 2006, 31 (10-11) :1472-1489
[5]   Geothermal district heating applications in Turkey: a case study of Izmir-Balcova [J].
Hepbasli, A ;
Canakci, C .
ENERGY CONVERSION AND MANAGEMENT, 2003, 44 (08) :1285-1301
[6]   A review on energetic, exergetic and exergoeconomic aspects of geothermal district heating systems (GDHSs) [J].
Hepbasli, Arif .
ENERGY CONVERSION AND MANAGEMENT, 2010, 51 (10) :2041-2061
[7]   Determination of optimum pipe diameter along with energetic and exergetic evaluation of geothermal district heating systems: Modeling and application [J].
Kalinci, Yidiz ;
Hepbasli, Arif ;
Tavman, Ismail .
ENERGY AND BUILDINGS, 2008, 40 (05) :742-755
[8]   Energetic, exergetic, economic and environmental evaluations of geothermal district heating systems: An application [J].
Kecebas, Ali .
ENERGY CONVERSION AND MANAGEMENT, 2013, 65 :546-556
[9]   Thermal monitoring and optimization of geothermal district heating systems using artificial neural network: A case study [J].
Kecebas, Ali ;
Yabanova, Ismail .
ENERGY AND BUILDINGS, 2012, 50 :339-346
[10]   Performance investigation of the Afyon geothermal district heating system for building applications: Exergy analysis [J].
Kecebas, Ali ;
Kayfeci, Muhammet ;
Gedik, Engin .
APPLIED THERMAL ENGINEERING, 2011, 31 (6-7) :1229-1237