Harm-Benefit Analysis: opportunities for enhancing ethical review in animal research

被引：15
作者：
Davies, Gail F. [1 ]
机构：
[1] Univ Exeter, Exeter, Devon, England
来源：
LAB ANIMAL | 2018年 / 47卷 / 03期
基金：
英国惠康基金;
关键词：
FELASA WORKING GROUP;
D O I：
10.1038/s41684-018-0002-2
中图分类号：
S85 [动物医学（兽医学）];
学科分类号：
0906 ;
摘要：
引用
收藏
页码：57 / 58
页数：2
相关论文
共 8 条
  • [1] AMS, 2015, REPR REL BIOM RES IM
  • [2] [Anonymous], 2019, Terrestrial Animal Health Code, VII.
  • [3] Current concepts of Harm-Benefit Analysis of Animal Experiments - Report from the AALAS-FELASA Working Group on Harm-Benefit Analysis - Part 1
    Bronstad, Aurora
    Newcomer, Christian E.
    Decelle, Thierry
    Everitt, Jeffrey I.
    Guillen, Javier
    Laber, Kathy
    [J]. LABORATORY ANIMALS, 2016, 50 : 1 - 20
  • [4] CIOMS-ICLAS, 2012, International Guiding Principles For Biomedical Research Involving Animals
  • [5] Haraway D., 2008, SPECIES MEET, P87
  • [6] Recommendations for Addressing Harm-Benefit Analysis and Implementation in Ethical Evaluation - Report from the AALAS-FELASA Working Group on Harm-Benefit Analysis - Part 2
    Laber, Kathy
    Newcomer, Christian E.
    Decelle, Thierry
    Everitt, Jeffrey I.
    Guillen, Javier
    Bronstad, Aurora
    [J]. LABORATORY ANIMALS, 2016, 50 : 21 - 42
  • [7] Transparency and Public Involvement in Animal Research
    Pound, Pandora
    Blaug, Ricardo
    [J]. ATLA-ALTERNATIVES TO LABORATORY ANIMALS, 2016, 44 (02): : 167 - 173
  • [8] Walport M., 2016, ANIMAL RES THEN NOW
1