Timing Validation of Automotive Software

被引:0
作者
Kaestner, Daniel [1 ]
Wilhelm, Reinhard [2 ]
Heckmann, Reinhold [1 ]
Schlickling, Marc [1 ,2 ]
Pister, Markus [1 ,2 ]
Jersak, Marek [3 ]
Richter, Kai [3 ]
Ferdinand, Christian [1 ]
机构
[1] AbsInt GmbH, Saarbrucken, Germany
[2] Univ Saarland, D-66123 Saarbrucken, Germany
[3] Symtavis GmbH, Braunschweig, Germany
来源
LEVERAGING APPLICATIONS OF FORMAL METHODS, VERIFICATION AND VALIDATION, PROCEEDINGS | 2008年 / 17卷
关键词
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
TP [自动化技术、计算机技术];
学科分类号
0812 ;
摘要
Embedded hard real-time systems need reliable guarantees for the satisfaction of their timing constraints. During the last years sophisticated analysis tools for timing analysis at the code-level, controller-level and networked system-level have been developed. This trend is exemplified by two tools: AbsInt's timing analyzer aiT, and and Symtavision's SymTA/S. aiT determines safe upper bounds for the execution times (WCETs) of non-interrupted tasks. SymTA/S computes the worst-case response times (WCRTs) of an entire system from the task WCETs and from information about possible interrupts and their priorities. A seamless integration between both tools provides for a holistic approach to timing validation: starting from a system model, a designer can perform timing budgeting, performance optimization and timing verification, thus covering both the code arid the system aspects. However, tire precision of the results arid the efficiency of the analysis methods are highly dependent on the predictability of the execution platform. Especially on multi-core architectures this aspect becomes of critical importance. This paper describes an industry-strength tool flow for timing validation, and discusses prerequisites at the hardware level for ascertaining high analysis precision.
引用
收藏
页码:93 / +
页数:4
相关论文
共 50 条
[31]   Revealing the Complexity of Automotive Software [J].
Antinyan, Vard .
PROCEEDINGS OF THE 28TH ACM JOINT MEETING ON EUROPEAN SOFTWARE ENGINEERING CONFERENCE AND SYMPOSIUM ON THE FOUNDATIONS OF SOFTWARE ENGINEERING (ESEC/FSE '20), 2020, :1525-1528
[32]   Opinion: An Outlook on Automotive Software [J].
Krueger, Ingolf .
IEEE EMBEDDED SYSTEMS LETTERS, 2010, 2 (01) :14-15
[33]   Challenges in Reengineering Automotive Software [J].
Schulte-Coerne, Vincent ;
Thums, Andreas ;
Quante, Jochen .
13TH EUROPEAN CONFERENCE ON SOFTWARE MAINTENANCE AND REENGINEERING: CSMR 2009, PROCEEDINGS, 2009, :315-316
[34]   Challenges in Automotive Software Engineering [J].
Hanselmann, Herbert .
ICSE'08 PROCEEDINGS OF THE THIRTIETH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON SOFTWARE ENGINEERING, 2008, :888-888
[35]   Automotive software and systems engineering [J].
Broy, M .
THIRD ACM & IEEE INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON FORMAL METHODS AND MODELS FOR CO-DESIGN, PROCEEDINGS, 2005, :143-149
[36]   Towards Certification of Automotive Software [J].
Areias, Cristiana ;
Cunha, Joao Carlos ;
Iacono, Davide ;
Rossi, Francesco .
2014 IEEE INTERNATIONAL SYMPOSIUM ON SOFTWARE RELIABILITY ENGINEERING WORKSHOPS (ISSREW), 2014, :491-496
[37]   Challenges in the Design of Automotive Software [J].
Fuerst, Simon .
2010 DESIGN, AUTOMATION & TEST IN EUROPE (DATE 2010), 2010, :256-258
[38]   Safe automotive software development [J].
Tindell, K ;
Kopetz, H ;
Wolf, F ;
Ernst, R .
DESIGN, AUTOMATION AND TEST IN EUROPE CONFERENCE AND EXHIBITION, PROCEEDINGS, 2003, :616-621
[39]   Guidelines for the development of automotive software [J].
Ward, D .
SOFTWARE ENGINEERING JOURNAL, 1996, 11 (02) :76-81
[40]   Safe automotive software development [J].
Tindell, K ;
Kopetz, H ;
Wolf, F ;
Ernst, R .
EMBEDDED SOFTWARE FOR SOC, 2003, :333-342