Timing Validation of Automotive Software

被引:0
作者
Kaestner, Daniel [1 ]
Wilhelm, Reinhard [2 ]
Heckmann, Reinhold [1 ]
Schlickling, Marc [1 ,2 ]
Pister, Markus [1 ,2 ]
Jersak, Marek [3 ]
Richter, Kai [3 ]
Ferdinand, Christian [1 ]
机构
[1] AbsInt GmbH, Saarbrucken, Germany
[2] Univ Saarland, D-66123 Saarbrucken, Germany
[3] Symtavis GmbH, Braunschweig, Germany
来源
LEVERAGING APPLICATIONS OF FORMAL METHODS, VERIFICATION AND VALIDATION, PROCEEDINGS | 2008年 / 17卷
关键词
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
TP [自动化技术、计算机技术];
学科分类号
0812 ;
摘要
Embedded hard real-time systems need reliable guarantees for the satisfaction of their timing constraints. During the last years sophisticated analysis tools for timing analysis at the code-level, controller-level and networked system-level have been developed. This trend is exemplified by two tools: AbsInt's timing analyzer aiT, and and Symtavision's SymTA/S. aiT determines safe upper bounds for the execution times (WCETs) of non-interrupted tasks. SymTA/S computes the worst-case response times (WCRTs) of an entire system from the task WCETs and from information about possible interrupts and their priorities. A seamless integration between both tools provides for a holistic approach to timing validation: starting from a system model, a designer can perform timing budgeting, performance optimization and timing verification, thus covering both the code arid the system aspects. However, tire precision of the results arid the efficiency of the analysis methods are highly dependent on the predictability of the execution platform. Especially on multi-core architectures this aspect becomes of critical importance. This paper describes an industry-strength tool flow for timing validation, and discusses prerequisites at the hardware level for ascertaining high analysis precision.
引用
收藏
页码:93 / +
页数:4
相关论文
共 50 条
[21]   Automotive software foundry - Vision of a future automotive software engineering plattform [J].
Eppinger, A .
ELECTRONIC SYSTEMS FOR VEHICLES, 2003, 1789 :163-170
[22]   Towards Formal Co-validation of Hardware and Software Timing Models of CPSs [J].
Asavoae, Mihail ;
Haur, Imane ;
Jan, Mathieu ;
Ben Hedia, Belgacem ;
Schoeberl, Martin .
CYBER PHYSICAL SYSTEMS: MODEL-BASED DESIGN, CYPHY 2019, 2020, 11971 :203-227
[23]   Automotive software integration [J].
Racu, Razvan ;
Hamann, Arne ;
Ernst, Rolf ;
Richter, Kai .
2007 44TH ACM/IEEE DESIGN AUTOMATION CONFERENCE, VOLS 1 AND 2, 2007, :545-+
[24]   Software in Automotive Systems [J].
Moessinger, Juergen .
IEEE SOFTWARE, 2010, 27 (02) :92-94
[25]   Automotive software engineering [J].
Broy, M .
25TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON SOFTWARE ENGINEERING, PROCEEDINGS, 2003, :719-720
[26]   Engineering automotive software [J].
Broy, Manfred ;
Krueger, Ingolf H. ;
Pretschner, Alexander ;
Salzmann, Christian .
PROCEEDINGS OF THE IEEE, 2007, 95 (02) :356-373
[27]   Augmented Reality on LiDAR data: Going beyond Vehicle-in-the-Loop for Automotive Software Validation [J].
Genevois, Thomas ;
Horel, Jean-Baptiste ;
Renzaglia, Alessandro ;
Laugier, Christian .
2022 IEEE INTELLIGENT VEHICLES SYMPOSIUM (IV), 2022, :971-976
[28]   Management of automotive software updates [J].
Placho, Teresa ;
Schmittner, Christoph ;
Bonitz, Arndt ;
Wana, Oliver .
MICROPROCESSORS AND MICROSYSTEMS, 2020, 78
[29]   Deep Learning in Automotive Software [J].
Falcini, Fabio ;
Lami, Giuseppe ;
Costanza, Alessandra Mitidieri .
IEEE SOFTWARE, 2017, 34 (03) :56-63
[30]   Reengineering Embedded Automotive Software [J].
Thums, Andreas ;
Quante, Jochen .
2012 28TH IEEE INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON SOFTWARE MAINTENANCE (ICSM), 2012, :493-502