Comprehensive evaluation and clinical implementation of commercially available Monte Carlo dose calculation algorithm

被引:18
|
作者
Zhang, Aizhen [1 ]
Wen, Ning [2 ]
Nurushev, Teamour [2 ]
Burmeister, Jay [1 ]
Chetty, Indrin J. [2 ]
机构
[1] Wayne State Univ, Dept Radiat Oncol, Sch Med, Gershenson Radiat Oncol Ctr, Detroit, MI 48202 USA
[2] Henry Ford Hlth Syst, Dept Radiat Oncol, Detroit, MI USA
来源
JOURNAL OF APPLIED CLINICAL MEDICAL PHYSICS | 2013年 / 14卷 / 02期
关键词
Monte Carlo; electron beam; commissioning; MU calculation; TREATMENT PLANNING SYSTEM; ELECTRON-BEAMS; PENCIL BEAM; CODE; RADIOTHERAPY; SIMULATION; PENELOPE; PHOTON; DPM; DISTRIBUTIONS;
D O I
10.1120/jacmp.v14i2.4062
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
A commercial electron Monte Carlo (eMC) dose calculation algorithm has become available in Eclipse treatment planning system. The purpose of this work was to evaluate the eMC algorithm and investigate the clinical implementation of this system. The beam modeling of the eMC algorithm was performed for beam energies of 6, 9, 12, 16, and 20 MeV for a Varian Trilogy and all available applicator sizes in the Eclipse treatment planning system. The accuracy of the eMC algorithm was evaluated in a homogeneous water phantom, solid water phantoms containing lung and bone materials, and an anthropomorphic phantom. In addition, dose calculation accuracy was compared between pencil beam (PB) and eMC algorithms in the same treatment planning system for heterogeneous phantoms. The overall agreement between eMC calculations and measurements was within 3%/2 mm, while the PB algorithm had large errors (up to 25%) in predicting dose distributions in the presence of inhomogeneities such as bone and lung. The clinical implementation of the eMC algorithm was investigated by performing treatment planning for 15 patients with lesions in the head and neck, breast, chest wall, and sternum. The dose distributions were calculated using PB and eMC algorithms with no smoothing and all three levels of 3D Gaussian smoothing for comparison. Based on a routine electron beam therapy prescription method, the number of eMC calculated monitor units (MUs) was found to increase with increased 3D Gaussian smoothing levels. 3D Gaussian smoothing greatly improved the visual usability of dose distributions and produced better target coverage. Differences of calculated MUs and dose distributions between eMC and PB algorithms could be significant when oblique beam incidence, surface irregularities, and heterogeneous tissues were present in the treatment plans. In our patient cases, monitor unit differences of up to 7% were observed between PB and eMC algorithms. Monitor unit calculations were also preformed based on point-dose prescription. The eMC algorithm calculation was characterized by deeper penetration in the low-density regions, such as lung and air cavities. As a result, the mean dose in the low-density regions was underestimated using PB algorithm. The eMC computation time ranged from 5 min to 66 min on a single 2.66 GHz desktop, which is comparable with PB algorithm calculation time for the same resolution level.
引用
收藏
页码:127 / 145
页数:19
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Evaluation of the accuracy of various dose calculation algorithms of a commercial treatment planning system in the presence of hip prosthesis and comparison with Monte Carlo
    Mohammadi, Kheirollah
    Hassani, Mohsen
    Ghorbani, Mahdi
    Farhood, Bagher
    Knaup, Courtney
    JOURNAL OF CANCER RESEARCH AND THERAPEUTICS, 2017, 13 (03) : 501 - 509
  • [42] Clinical implementation of a Monte Carlo based independent TPS dose checking system
    Livingstone, A. G.
    Crowe, S. B.
    Sylvander, S.
    Kairn, T.
    PHYSICAL AND ENGINEERING SCIENCES IN MEDICINE, 2020, 43 (03) : 1113 - 1123
  • [43] Validation of Monte Carlo dose calculation algorithm for CyberKnife multileaf collimator
    Gondre, Maude
    Marsolat, Fanny
    Bourhis, Jean
    Bochud, Francois
    Moeckli, Raphael
    JOURNAL OF APPLIED CLINICAL MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2022, 23 (02):
  • [44] Validation of an electron Monte Carlo dose calculation algorithm in the presence of heterogeneities using EGSnrc and radiochromic film measurements
    Aubry, Jean-Francois
    Bouchard, Hugo
    Bessieres, Igor
    Lacroix, Frederic
    JOURNAL OF APPLIED CLINICAL MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2011, 12 (04): : 2 - 14
  • [45] Novel Monte Carlo dose calculation algorithm for robotic radiosurgery with multi leaf collimator: Dosimetric evaluation
    Heidorn, Sarah-Charlotta
    Kilby, Warren
    Fuerweger, Christoph
    PHYSICA MEDICA-EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2018, 55 : 25 - 32
  • [46] GPU-accelerated Monte Carlo convolution/superposition implementation for dose calculation
    Zhou, Bo
    Yu, Cedric X.
    Chen, Danny Z.
    Hu, X. Sharon
    MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2010, 37 (11) : 5593 - 5603
  • [47] A virtual-acceterator-based verification of a Monte Carlo dose calculation algorithm for electron beam treatment planning in clinical situations
    Wieslander, Elinore
    Knoos, Tommy
    RADIOTHERAPY AND ONCOLOGY, 2007, 82 (02) : 208 - 217
  • [48] Monte Carlo-based dose calculation engine for minibeam radiation therapy
    Martinez-Rovira, I.
    Sempau, J.
    Prezado, Y.
    PHYSICA MEDICA-EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2014, 30 (01): : 57 - 62
  • [49] Fast CPU-based Monte Carlo simulation for radiotherapy dose calculation
    Ziegenhein, Peter
    Pirner, Sven
    Kamerling, Cornelis Ph
    Oelfke, Uwe
    PHYSICS IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY, 2015, 60 (15) : 6097 - 6111
  • [50] The Monte Carlo code MCPTV-Monte Carlo dose calculation in radiation therapy with carbon ions
    Karg, Juergen
    Speer, Stefan
    Schmidt, Manfred
    Mueller, Reinhold
    PHYSICS IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY, 2010, 55 (13) : 3917 - 3936