Comprehensive evaluation and clinical implementation of commercially available Monte Carlo dose calculation algorithm

被引:18
|
作者
Zhang, Aizhen [1 ]
Wen, Ning [2 ]
Nurushev, Teamour [2 ]
Burmeister, Jay [1 ]
Chetty, Indrin J. [2 ]
机构
[1] Wayne State Univ, Dept Radiat Oncol, Sch Med, Gershenson Radiat Oncol Ctr, Detroit, MI 48202 USA
[2] Henry Ford Hlth Syst, Dept Radiat Oncol, Detroit, MI USA
来源
JOURNAL OF APPLIED CLINICAL MEDICAL PHYSICS | 2013年 / 14卷 / 02期
关键词
Monte Carlo; electron beam; commissioning; MU calculation; TREATMENT PLANNING SYSTEM; ELECTRON-BEAMS; PENCIL BEAM; CODE; RADIOTHERAPY; SIMULATION; PENELOPE; PHOTON; DPM; DISTRIBUTIONS;
D O I
10.1120/jacmp.v14i2.4062
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
A commercial electron Monte Carlo (eMC) dose calculation algorithm has become available in Eclipse treatment planning system. The purpose of this work was to evaluate the eMC algorithm and investigate the clinical implementation of this system. The beam modeling of the eMC algorithm was performed for beam energies of 6, 9, 12, 16, and 20 MeV for a Varian Trilogy and all available applicator sizes in the Eclipse treatment planning system. The accuracy of the eMC algorithm was evaluated in a homogeneous water phantom, solid water phantoms containing lung and bone materials, and an anthropomorphic phantom. In addition, dose calculation accuracy was compared between pencil beam (PB) and eMC algorithms in the same treatment planning system for heterogeneous phantoms. The overall agreement between eMC calculations and measurements was within 3%/2 mm, while the PB algorithm had large errors (up to 25%) in predicting dose distributions in the presence of inhomogeneities such as bone and lung. The clinical implementation of the eMC algorithm was investigated by performing treatment planning for 15 patients with lesions in the head and neck, breast, chest wall, and sternum. The dose distributions were calculated using PB and eMC algorithms with no smoothing and all three levels of 3D Gaussian smoothing for comparison. Based on a routine electron beam therapy prescription method, the number of eMC calculated monitor units (MUs) was found to increase with increased 3D Gaussian smoothing levels. 3D Gaussian smoothing greatly improved the visual usability of dose distributions and produced better target coverage. Differences of calculated MUs and dose distributions between eMC and PB algorithms could be significant when oblique beam incidence, surface irregularities, and heterogeneous tissues were present in the treatment plans. In our patient cases, monitor unit differences of up to 7% were observed between PB and eMC algorithms. Monitor unit calculations were also preformed based on point-dose prescription. The eMC algorithm calculation was characterized by deeper penetration in the low-density regions, such as lung and air cavities. As a result, the mean dose in the low-density regions was underestimated using PB algorithm. The eMC computation time ranged from 5 min to 66 min on a single 2.66 GHz desktop, which is comparable with PB algorithm calculation time for the same resolution level.
引用
收藏
页码:127 / 145
页数:19
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Development of a fast Monte Carlo dose calculation system for online adaptive radiation therapy quality assurance
    Wang, Yuhe
    Mazur, Thomas R.
    Park, Justin C.
    Yang, Deshan
    Mutic, Sasa
    Li, H. Harold
    PHYSICS IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY, 2017, 62 (12) : 4970 - 4990
  • [32] Monte Carlo evaluation of Acuros XB dose calculation Algorithm for intensity modulated radiation therapy of nasopharyngeal carcinoma
    Yeh, Peter C. Y.
    Lee, C. C.
    Chao, T. C.
    Tung, C. J.
    RADIATION PHYSICS AND CHEMISTRY, 2017, 140 : 419 - 422
  • [33] Quantitative assessment of the accuracy of dose calculation using pencil beam and Monte Carlo algorithms and requirements for clinical quality assurance
    Ali, Imad
    Ahmad, Salahuddin
    MEDICAL DOSIMETRY, 2013, 38 (03) : 255 - 261
  • [34] GMC: a GPU implementation of a Monte Carlo dose calculation based on Geant4
    Jahnke, Lennart
    Fleckenstein, Jens
    Wenz, Frederik
    Hesser, Juergen
    PHYSICS IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY, 2012, 57 (05) : 1217 - 1229
  • [35] Experimental evaluation of a GPU-based Monte Carlo dose calculation algorithm in the Monaco treatment planning system
    Paudel, Moti R.
    Kim, Anthony
    Sarfehnia, Arman
    Ahmad, Sayed B.
    Beachey, David J.
    Sahgal, Arjun
    Keller, Brian M.
    JOURNAL OF APPLIED CLINICAL MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2016, 17 (06): : 230 - 241
  • [36] Millisecond speed deep learning based proton dose calculation with Monte Carlo accuracy
    Pastor-Serrano, Oscar
    Perko, Zoltan
    PHYSICS IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY, 2022, 67 (10)
  • [37] A robust intensity modulated proton therapy optimizer based on Monte Carlo dose calculation
    Ma, Jiasen
    Tseung, Hok Seum Wan Chan
    Herman, Michael G.
    Beltran, Chris
    MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2018, 45 (09) : 4045 - 4054
  • [38] A Monte Carlo dose calculation system for ophthalmic brachytherapy based on a realistic eye model
    Miras del Rio, Hector
    Ortiz Lora, Antonio
    Bertolet Reina, Alejandro
    Terron Leon, Jose Antonio
    MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2021, 48 (08) : 4542 - 4559
  • [39] Commissioning a fast Monte Carlo dose calculation algorithm for lung cancer treatment planning
    Craig, Jeff
    Oliver, Mike
    Gladwish, Adam
    Mulligan, Matt
    Chen, Jeff
    Wong, Eugene
    JOURNAL OF APPLIED CLINICAL MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2008, 9 (02): : 83 - 97
  • [40] Clinical verification of treatment planning dose calculation in lung SBRT with GATE Monte Carlo simulation code
    Boiset, Gisell Ruiz
    Batista, Delano V. S.
    Cardoso, Simone Coutinho
    PHYSICA MEDICA-EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2021, 87 : 1 - 10