Comprehensive evaluation and clinical implementation of commercially available Monte Carlo dose calculation algorithm

被引:18
|
作者
Zhang, Aizhen [1 ]
Wen, Ning [2 ]
Nurushev, Teamour [2 ]
Burmeister, Jay [1 ]
Chetty, Indrin J. [2 ]
机构
[1] Wayne State Univ, Dept Radiat Oncol, Sch Med, Gershenson Radiat Oncol Ctr, Detroit, MI 48202 USA
[2] Henry Ford Hlth Syst, Dept Radiat Oncol, Detroit, MI USA
来源
JOURNAL OF APPLIED CLINICAL MEDICAL PHYSICS | 2013年 / 14卷 / 02期
关键词
Monte Carlo; electron beam; commissioning; MU calculation; TREATMENT PLANNING SYSTEM; ELECTRON-BEAMS; PENCIL BEAM; CODE; RADIOTHERAPY; SIMULATION; PENELOPE; PHOTON; DPM; DISTRIBUTIONS;
D O I
10.1120/jacmp.v14i2.4062
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
A commercial electron Monte Carlo (eMC) dose calculation algorithm has become available in Eclipse treatment planning system. The purpose of this work was to evaluate the eMC algorithm and investigate the clinical implementation of this system. The beam modeling of the eMC algorithm was performed for beam energies of 6, 9, 12, 16, and 20 MeV for a Varian Trilogy and all available applicator sizes in the Eclipse treatment planning system. The accuracy of the eMC algorithm was evaluated in a homogeneous water phantom, solid water phantoms containing lung and bone materials, and an anthropomorphic phantom. In addition, dose calculation accuracy was compared between pencil beam (PB) and eMC algorithms in the same treatment planning system for heterogeneous phantoms. The overall agreement between eMC calculations and measurements was within 3%/2 mm, while the PB algorithm had large errors (up to 25%) in predicting dose distributions in the presence of inhomogeneities such as bone and lung. The clinical implementation of the eMC algorithm was investigated by performing treatment planning for 15 patients with lesions in the head and neck, breast, chest wall, and sternum. The dose distributions were calculated using PB and eMC algorithms with no smoothing and all three levels of 3D Gaussian smoothing for comparison. Based on a routine electron beam therapy prescription method, the number of eMC calculated monitor units (MUs) was found to increase with increased 3D Gaussian smoothing levels. 3D Gaussian smoothing greatly improved the visual usability of dose distributions and produced better target coverage. Differences of calculated MUs and dose distributions between eMC and PB algorithms could be significant when oblique beam incidence, surface irregularities, and heterogeneous tissues were present in the treatment plans. In our patient cases, monitor unit differences of up to 7% were observed between PB and eMC algorithms. Monitor unit calculations were also preformed based on point-dose prescription. The eMC algorithm calculation was characterized by deeper penetration in the low-density regions, such as lung and air cavities. As a result, the mean dose in the low-density regions was underestimated using PB algorithm. The eMC computation time ranged from 5 min to 66 min on a single 2.66 GHz desktop, which is comparable with PB algorithm calculation time for the same resolution level.
引用
收藏
页码:127 / 145
页数:19
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] An evaluation of calculation parameters in the EGSnrc/BEAMnrc Monte Carlo codes and their effect on surface dose calculation
    Kim, Jung-Ha
    Hill, Robin
    Kuncic, Zdenka
    PHYSICS IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY, 2012, 57 (14) : N267 - N278
  • [22] A clinical study of lung cancer dose calculation accuracy with Monte Carlo simulation
    Zhao, Yanqun
    Qi, Guohai
    Yin, Gang
    Wang, Xianliang
    Wang, Pei
    Li, Jian
    Xiao, Mingyong
    Li, Jie
    Kang, Shengwei
    Liao, Xiongfei
    RADIATION ONCOLOGY, 2014, 9
  • [23] Comprehensive evaluation of a commercial macro Monte Carlo electron dose calculation implementation using a standard verification data set
    Popple, Richard A.
    Weinberg, Rebecca
    Antolak, John A.
    Ye, Sung-Joon
    Pareek, Prem N.
    Duan, Jun
    Shen, Sui
    Brezovich, Ivan A.
    MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2006, 33 (06) : 1540 - 1551
  • [24] A Monte Carlo dose calculation algorithm for proton therapy
    Fippel, M
    Soukup, M
    MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2004, 31 (08) : 2263 - 2273
  • [25] Quantitative evaluation of dosimetric uncertainties in electron therapy by measurement and calculation using the electron Monte Carlo dose algorithm in the Eclipse treatment planning system
    Ali, Imad
    Alsbou, Nesreen
    Ahmad, Salahuddin
    JOURNAL OF APPLIED CLINICAL MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2022, 23 (01):
  • [26] Verification measurements and clinical evaluation of the iPlan RT Monte Carlo dose algorithm for 6 MV photon energy
    Petoukhova, A. L.
    van Wingerden, K.
    Wiggenraad, R. G. J.
    van de Vaart, P. J. M.
    van Egmond, J.
    Franken, E. M.
    van Santvoort, J. P. C.
    PHYSICS IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY, 2010, 55 (16) : 4601 - 4614
  • [27] A physically constrained Monte Carlo-Neural Network coupling algorithm for BNCT dose calculation
    Wang, Yongquan
    Du, Junliang
    Lin, Huan
    Guan, Xingcai
    Zhang, Lu
    Li, Jinyang
    Gu, Long
    MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2024, 51 (06) : 4524 - 4535
  • [28] Clinical Comparison of Dose Calculation Using the Enhanced Collapsed Cone Algorithm vs. a New Monte Carlo Algorithm
    Fotina, Irina
    Kragl, Gabriele
    Kroupa, Bernhard
    Trausmuth, Robert
    Georg, Dietmar
    STRAHLENTHERAPIE UND ONKOLOGIE, 2011, 187 (07) : 433 - 441
  • [29] Towards real-time photon Monte Carlo dose calculation in the cloud
    Ziegenhein, Peter
    Kozin, Igor N.
    Kamerling, Cornelis Ph
    Oelfke, Uwe
    PHYSICS IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY, 2017, 62 (11) : 4375 - 4389
  • [30] OpenMP-based Monte Carlo dose calculation for radiotherapy treatment planning on the Intel MIC Architecture
    Wang, Qinglin
    Liu, Jie
    Xie, Peizhen
    Gong, Chunye
    Li, Yuan
    Xing, Zuocheng
    2015 7TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY IN MEDICINE AND EDUCATION (ITME), 2015, : 138 - 142