Comprehensive evaluation and clinical implementation of commercially available Monte Carlo dose calculation algorithm

被引:18
|
作者
Zhang, Aizhen [1 ]
Wen, Ning [2 ]
Nurushev, Teamour [2 ]
Burmeister, Jay [1 ]
Chetty, Indrin J. [2 ]
机构
[1] Wayne State Univ, Dept Radiat Oncol, Sch Med, Gershenson Radiat Oncol Ctr, Detroit, MI 48202 USA
[2] Henry Ford Hlth Syst, Dept Radiat Oncol, Detroit, MI USA
来源
JOURNAL OF APPLIED CLINICAL MEDICAL PHYSICS | 2013年 / 14卷 / 02期
关键词
Monte Carlo; electron beam; commissioning; MU calculation; TREATMENT PLANNING SYSTEM; ELECTRON-BEAMS; PENCIL BEAM; CODE; RADIOTHERAPY; SIMULATION; PENELOPE; PHOTON; DPM; DISTRIBUTIONS;
D O I
10.1120/jacmp.v14i2.4062
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
A commercial electron Monte Carlo (eMC) dose calculation algorithm has become available in Eclipse treatment planning system. The purpose of this work was to evaluate the eMC algorithm and investigate the clinical implementation of this system. The beam modeling of the eMC algorithm was performed for beam energies of 6, 9, 12, 16, and 20 MeV for a Varian Trilogy and all available applicator sizes in the Eclipse treatment planning system. The accuracy of the eMC algorithm was evaluated in a homogeneous water phantom, solid water phantoms containing lung and bone materials, and an anthropomorphic phantom. In addition, dose calculation accuracy was compared between pencil beam (PB) and eMC algorithms in the same treatment planning system for heterogeneous phantoms. The overall agreement between eMC calculations and measurements was within 3%/2 mm, while the PB algorithm had large errors (up to 25%) in predicting dose distributions in the presence of inhomogeneities such as bone and lung. The clinical implementation of the eMC algorithm was investigated by performing treatment planning for 15 patients with lesions in the head and neck, breast, chest wall, and sternum. The dose distributions were calculated using PB and eMC algorithms with no smoothing and all three levels of 3D Gaussian smoothing for comparison. Based on a routine electron beam therapy prescription method, the number of eMC calculated monitor units (MUs) was found to increase with increased 3D Gaussian smoothing levels. 3D Gaussian smoothing greatly improved the visual usability of dose distributions and produced better target coverage. Differences of calculated MUs and dose distributions between eMC and PB algorithms could be significant when oblique beam incidence, surface irregularities, and heterogeneous tissues were present in the treatment plans. In our patient cases, monitor unit differences of up to 7% were observed between PB and eMC algorithms. Monitor unit calculations were also preformed based on point-dose prescription. The eMC algorithm calculation was characterized by deeper penetration in the low-density regions, such as lung and air cavities. As a result, the mean dose in the low-density regions was underestimated using PB algorithm. The eMC computation time ranged from 5 min to 66 min on a single 2.66 GHz desktop, which is comparable with PB algorithm calculation time for the same resolution level.
引用
收藏
页码:127 / 145
页数:19
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] DOSE CALCULATION ACCURACY OF THE MONTE CARLO ALGORITHM FOR CYBERKNIFE COMPARED WITH OTHER COMMERCIALLY AVAILABLE DOSE CALCULATION ALGORITHMS
    Sharma, Subhash
    Ott, Joseph
    Williams, Jamone
    Dickow, Danny
    MEDICAL DOSIMETRY, 2011, 36 (04) : 347 - 350
  • [2] Evaluation of heterogeneity dose distributions for Stereotactic Radiotherapy (SRT): comparison of commercially available Monte Carlo dose calculation with other algorithms
    Takahashi, Wataru
    Yamashita, Hideomi
    Saotome, Naoya
    Iwai, Yoshio
    Sakumi, Akira
    Haga, Akihiro
    Nakagawa, Keiichi
    RADIATION ONCOLOGY, 2012, 7
  • [3] Evaluation of an electron Monte Carlo dose calculation algorithm for treatment planning
    Chamberland, Eve
    Beaulieu, Luc
    Lachance, Bernard
    JOURNAL OF APPLIED CLINICAL MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2015, 16 (03): : 60 - 79
  • [4] Monte Carlo evaluation of the dose calculation algorithm of TomoTherapy for clinical cases in dynamic jaws mode
    Sterpin, E.
    PHYSICA MEDICA-EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2015, 31 (03): : 273 - 280
  • [5] Clinical implementation and evaluation of the Acuros dose calculation algorithm
    Yan, Chenyu
    Combine, Anthony G.
    Bednarz, Greg
    Lalonde, Ronald J.
    Hu, Bin
    Dickens, Kathy
    Wynn, Raymond
    Pavord, Daniel C.
    Huq, M. Saiful
    JOURNAL OF APPLIED CLINICAL MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2017, 18 (05): : 195 - 209
  • [6] Evaluation of the RayStation electron Monte Carlo dose calculation algorithm
    Richmond, Neil
    Allen, Vincent
    Wyatt, Jonathan
    Codling, Richard
    MEDICAL DOSIMETRY, 2020, 45 (02) : 159 - 167
  • [7] Experimental verification and clinical implementation of a commercial Monte Carlo electron beam dose calculation algorithm
    Fragosoa, Margarida
    Pillai, Sushakumari
    Solberg, Timothy D.
    Chetty, Indrin J.
    MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2008, 35 (03) : 1028 - 1038
  • [8] Evaluation of a new commercial Monte Carlo dose calculation algorithm for electron beams
    Vandervoort, Eric J.
    Tchistiakova, Ekaterina
    La Russa, Daniel J.
    Cygler, Joanna E.
    MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2014, 41 (02) : 021711
  • [9] Dosimetric verification and clinical evaluation of a new commercially available Monte Carlo-based dose algorithm for application in stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) treatment planning
    Fragoso, Margarida
    Wen, Ning
    Kumar, Sanath
    Liu, Dezhi
    Ryu, Samuel
    Movsas, Benjamin
    Munther, Ajlouni
    Chetty, Indrin J.
    PHYSICS IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY, 2010, 55 (16) : 4445 - 4464
  • [10] Evaluation of heterogeneity dose distributions for Stereotactic Radiotherapy (SRT): comparison of commercially available Monte Carlo dose calculation with other algorithms
    Wataru Takahashi
    Hideomi Yamashita
    Naoya Saotome
    Yoshio Iwai
    Akira Sakumi
    Akihiro Haga
    Keiichi Nakagawa
    Radiation Oncology, 7