Prevention Focus Relates to Performance on a Loss-Framed Inhibitory Control Task

被引:11
作者
Files, Benjamin T. [1 ]
Pollard, Kimberly A. [1 ]
Oiknine, Ashley H. [2 ,3 ]
Passaro, Antony D. [1 ]
Khooshabeh, Peter [1 ,3 ]
机构
[1] US Army, Human Res & Engn Directorate, Res Lab, Los Angeles, CA 90015 USA
[2] DCS Corp, Los Angeles, CA USA
[3] Univ Calif Santa Barbara, Dept Psychol & Brain Sci, Santa Barbara, CA 93106 USA
来源
FRONTIERS IN PSYCHOLOGY | 2019年 / 10卷
关键词
regulatory focus; training; go/no-go; feedback; gamification; inhibitory control; personalization; individual differences; FALSE DISCOVERY RATE; REGULATORY FOCUS; INDIVIDUAL-DIFFERENCES; FIT; MOTIVATION; DECISION; PROMOTION; GAMIFICATION; INFORMATION; PERSUASION;
D O I
10.3389/fpsyg.2019.00726
中图分类号
B84 [心理学];
学科分类号
04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
Information framing can be critical to the impact of information and can affect individuals differently. One contributing factor is a person's regulatory focus, which describes their focus on achieving gains vs. avoiding losses. We hypothesized that alignment between individual regulatory focus and the framing of performance feedback as either gain or loss would enhance performance improvements from computer-based training. We measured participants' (N = 93) trait-level regulatory focus; they then trained in a go/no-go inhibitory control task with feedback framed as gains, losses, or control feedback conditions. Some changes in performance with training (correct rejection rate and response time) were consistent with regulatory fit, but only in the loss-framed condition. This suggests that regulatory fit is more complex than cursory categorization of trait regulatory focus and feedback framing might indicate. Regulatory fit, feedback framing, and task affordances should be considered when designing feedback or including game-like feedback elements to aid computer-based training.
引用
收藏
页数:11
相关论文
共 58 条
  • [1] Short-term training in the Go/Nogo task: Behavioural and neural changes depend on task demands
    Benikos, Nicholas
    Johnstone, Stuart J.
    Roodenrys, Steven J.
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PSYCHOPHYSIOLOGY, 2013, 87 (03) : 301 - 312
  • [2] Benjamini Y, 2001, ANN STAT, V29, P1165
  • [3] CONTROLLING THE FALSE DISCOVERY RATE - A PRACTICAL AND POWERFUL APPROACH TO MULTIPLE TESTING
    BENJAMINI, Y
    HOCHBERG, Y
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THE ROYAL STATISTICAL SOCIETY SERIES B-STATISTICAL METHODOLOGY, 1995, 57 (01) : 289 - 300
  • [4] Cognitive Training Can Reduce Civilian Casualties in a Simulated Shooting Environment
    Biggs, Adam T.
    Cain, Matthew S.
    Mitroff, Stephen R.
    [J]. PSYCHOLOGICAL SCIENCE, 2015, 26 (08) : 1164 - 1176
  • [5] Inhibitory control in mind and brain: An interactive race model of countermanding Saccades
    Boucher, Leanne
    Palmeri, Thomas J.
    Logan, Gordon D.
    Schall, Jeffrey D.
    [J]. PSYCHOLOGICAL REVIEW, 2007, 114 (02) : 376 - 397
  • [6] The psychophysics toolbox
    Brainard, DH
    [J]. SPATIAL VISION, 1997, 10 (04): : 433 - 436
  • [7] Regulatory fit and persuasion: Transfer from "feeling right"
    Cesario, J
    Grant, H
    Higgins, ET
    [J]. JOURNAL OF PERSONALITY AND SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY, 2004, 86 (03) : 388 - 404
  • [8] Regulatory Fit and Persuasion: Basic Principles and Remaining Questions
    Cesario, Joseph
    Higgins, E. Tory
    Scholer, Abigail A.
    [J]. SOCIAL AND PERSONALITY PSYCHOLOGY COMPASS, 2008, 2 (01): : 444 - 463
  • [9] Codish D., 2014, Personality based gamification: How different personalities perceive gamification
  • [10] THE COST OF DICHOTOMIZATION
    COHEN, J
    [J]. APPLIED PSYCHOLOGICAL MEASUREMENT, 1983, 7 (03) : 249 - 253