Rapid review: Estimates of incremental breast cancer detection from tomosynthesis (3D-mammography) screening in women with dense breasts

被引:20
作者
Houssami, Nehmat [1 ,2 ]
Turner, Robin M. [3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Sydney, Sydney Med Sch, Sydney Sch Publ Hlth, Sydney, NSW, Australia
[2] Royal Hosp Women, Breast Ctr, Randwick, NSW, Australia
[3] Univ New South Wales, Sch Publ Hlth & Community Med, Sydney, NSW, Australia
关键词
Breast cancer; Breast tissue density; Digital breast tomosynthesis; Mammography; Population screening; DIGITAL MAMMOGRAPHY; IMPLEMENTATION; RISK; COMBINATION; PERFORMANCE; TRIAL;
D O I
10.1016/j.breast.2016.09.008
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
High breast tissue density increases breast cancer (BC) risk, and the risk of an interval BC in mammography screening. Density-tailored screening has mostly used adjunct imaging to screen women with dense breasts, however, the emergence of tomosynthesis (3D-mammography) provides an opportunity to steer density-tailored screening in new directions potentially obviating the need for adjunct imaging. A rapid review (a streamlined evidence synthesis) was performed to summarise data on tomosynthesis screening in women with heterogeneously dense or extremely dense breasts, with the aim of estimating incremental (additional) BC detection attributed to tomosynthesis in comparison with standard 2D-mammography. Meta-analysed data from prospective trials comparing these mammography modalities in the same women (N = 10,188) in predominantly biennial screening showed significant incremental BC detection of 3.9/1000 screens attributable to tomosynthesis (P < 0.001). Studies comparing different groups of women screened with tomosynthesis (N = 103,230) or with 2D-mammography (N = 177,814) yielded a pooled difference in BC detection of 1.4/1000 screens representing significantly higher BC detection in tomosynthesis-screened women (P < 0.001), and a pooled difference for recall of 23.3/1000 screens representing significantly lower recall in tomosynthesis-screened groups (P < 0.001), than for 2D-mammography. These estimates can inform planning of future trials of density-tailored screening and may guide discussion of screening women with dense breasts. (C) 2016 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:141 / 145
页数:5
相关论文
共 34 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 2015, STAT STAT SOFTW REL
[2]   Breast cancer screening with tomosynthesis (3D mammography) with acquired or synthetic 2D mammography compared with 2D mammography alone (STORM-2): a population-based prospective study [J].
Bernardi, Daniela ;
Macaskill, Petra ;
Pellegrini, Marco ;
Valentini, Marvi ;
Fanto, Carmine ;
Ostillio, Livio ;
Tuttobene, Paolina ;
Luparia, Andrea ;
Houssami, Nehmat .
LANCET ONCOLOGY, 2016, 17 (08) :1105-1113
[3]   Mammographic density and the risk and detection of breast cancer [J].
Boyd, Norman F. ;
Guo, Helen ;
Martin, Lisa J. ;
Sun, Limei ;
Stone, Jennifer ;
Fishell, Eve ;
Jong, Roberta A. ;
Hislop, Greg ;
Chiarelli, Anna ;
Minkin, Salomon ;
Yaffe, Martin J. .
NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 2007, 356 (03) :227-236
[4]   Integration of 3D digital mammography with tomosynthesis for population breast-cancer screening (STORM): a prospective comparison study [J].
Ciatto, Stefano ;
Houssami, Nehmat ;
Bernardi, Daniela ;
Caumo, Francesca ;
Pellegrini, Marco ;
Brunelli, Silvia ;
Tuttobene, Paola ;
Bricolo, Paola ;
Fanto, Carmine ;
Valentini, Marvi ;
Montemezzi, Stefania ;
Macaskill, Petra .
LANCET ONCOLOGY, 2013, 14 (07) :583-589
[5]   Breast cancer screening using tomosynthesis in combination with digital mammography compared to digital mammography alone: a cohort study within the PROSPR consortium [J].
Conant, Emily F. ;
Beaber, Elisabeth F. ;
Sprague, Brian L. ;
Herschorn, Sally D. ;
Weaver, Donald L. ;
Onega, Tracy ;
Tosteson, Anna N. A. ;
McCarthy, Anne Marie ;
Poplack, Steven P. ;
Haas, Jennifer S. ;
Armstrong, Katrina ;
Schnall, Mitchell D. ;
Barlow, William E. .
BREAST CANCER RESEARCH AND TREATMENT, 2016, 156 (01) :109-116
[6]   Prevention of Breast Cancer in Postmenopausal Women: Approaches to Estimating and Reducing Risk [J].
Cummings, Steven R. ;
Tice, Jeffrey A. ;
Bauer, Scott ;
Browner, Warren S. ;
Cuzick, Jack ;
Ziv, Elad ;
Vogel, Victor ;
Shepherd, John ;
Vachon, Celine ;
Smith-Bindman, Rebecca ;
Kerlikowske, Karla .
JNCI-JOURNAL OF THE NATIONAL CANCER INSTITUTE, 2009, 101 (06) :384-398
[7]  
DOrsi C. J, 2013, ATLAS BREAST IMAGING
[8]   Early Clinical Experience with Digital Breast Tomosynthesis for Screening Mammography [J].
Durand, Melissa A. ;
Haas, Brian M. ;
Yao, Xiaopan ;
Geisel, Jaime L. ;
Raghu, Madhavi ;
Hooley, Regina J. ;
Horvath, Laura J. ;
Philpotts, Liane E. .
RADIOLOGY, 2015, 274 (01) :85-92
[9]   Breast Cancer Screening Using Tomosynthesis in Combination With Digital Mammography [J].
Friedewald, Sarah M. ;
Rafferty, Elizabeth A. ;
Rose, Stephen L. ;
Durand, Melissa A. ;
Plecha, Donna M. ;
Greenberg, Julianne S. ;
Hayes, Mary K. ;
Copit, Debra S. ;
Carlson, Kara L. ;
Cink, Thomas M. ;
Barke, Lora D. ;
Greer, Linda N. ;
Miller, Dave P. ;
Conant, Emily F. .
JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 2014, 311 (24) :2499-2507
[10]   Digital breast tomosynthesis (DBT): a review of the evidence for use as a screening tool [J].
Gilbert, Fiona J. ;
Tucker, Lorraine ;
Young, Ken C. .
CLINICAL RADIOLOGY, 2016, 71 (02) :141-150