Comparison of clinical estimations and radiological measurements in the context of paediatric cervical masses: How accurate are we?

被引:0
作者
Wilkinson, Sophie [1 ]
Stubington, Thomas [1 ]
Charlton, Alex [2 ]
Cole, Simon [1 ]
Elloy, Marianne [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Hosp Leicester, Leicester Royal Infirm, Infirm Sq, Leicester LE15WW, England
[2] Nottingham Univ Hosp Derby Rd, Derby Rd, Nottingham NG72UH, England
关键词
Paediatric; Ultrasound; Lymph node; Accuracy; Neck mass; NECK MASSES; ROYAL-COLLEGE; CHILDREN; LYMPHADENOPATHY; GUIDELINES;
D O I
10.1016/j.ijporl.2022.111361
中图分类号
R76 [耳鼻咽喉科学];
学科分类号
100213 ;
摘要
Objectives: Cervical masses represent a common presentation to the paediatric ENT outpatient clinic. Despite their high prevalence, few represent an underlying malignant pathology. Currently, there is no universally accepted algorithm for management of such cases in the United Kingdom. Local guidance often centres around clinical interpretation of size when determining the need for investigation. With such emphasis placed on size, the authors sought to investigate the accuracy of physician palpation and in turn explore the validity of common referral pathways. Methods: A retrospective methodology was used to address the research objective. All paediatric ultrasound scans conducted during a 24-month period were reviewed to compare the clinical and radiological assessments of diameter. A 2 tailed paired student's t-test was selected to evaluate the differences between the two measurements and ultimately assess clinician accuracy. Results: 753 paediatric cervical ultrasound scans were conducted during the 2-year period. Initial analysis identified three discrete ultrasonographically diagnostic groups: lymph nodes (n = 532), non-lymph node masses (n = 162) and normal anatomy (n = 59). Further analysis of clinical estimation and radiological measurement demonstrated a statistically significant difference (p < 0.02) for the lymph-node group. A statistically significant difference was not demonstrated within the non-lymph node group (p = 0.66). When clinician assessment resulted in a value outside of what was considered accurate, lymph node sizes were predominantly overestimated (62/91, 68%). Conversely, non-lymph node masses where the clinical measurement was not within 5 mm of the ultrasound measurement were more commonly underestimated in size (11/45, 55%) but this was not statistically significant. Conclusions: Our study demonstrates a statistically significant tendency for clinicians to overestimate paediatric cervical lymphadenopathy. Calliper measurement may further improve accuracy of assessment.
引用
收藏
页数:5
相关论文
共 14 条
[1]  
BOURDILLON P, 1993, BRIT MED J, V306, P110
[2]   Diagnostic imaging of benign and malignant neck masses in children-a pictorial review [J].
Brown, Ruth Elizabeth ;
Harave, Srikrishna .
QUANTITATIVE IMAGING IN MEDICINE AND SURGERY, 2016, 6 (05) :591-604
[3]   Accuracy of physical examination, ultrasonography, and mammography in predicting residual pathologic tumor size in patients treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy [J].
Chagpar, AB ;
Middleton, LP ;
Sahin, AA ;
Dempsey, P ;
Buzdar, AU ;
Mirza, AN ;
Ames, FC ;
Babiera, GV ;
Feig, BW ;
Hunt, KK ;
Kuerer, HM ;
Meric-Bernstam, F ;
Ross, MI ;
Singletary, SE .
ANNALS OF SURGERY, 2006, 243 (02) :257-264
[4]   Development of an algorithm for the management of cervical lymphadenopathy in children: consensus of the Italian Society of Preventive and Social Pediatrics, jointly with the Italian Society of Pediatric Infectious Diseases and the Italian Society of Pediatric Otorhinolaryngology [J].
Chiappini, Elena ;
Camaioni, Angelo ;
Benazzo, Marco ;
Biondi, Andrea ;
Bottero, Sergio ;
De Masi, Salvatore ;
Di Mauro, Giuseppe ;
Doria, Mattia ;
Esposito, Susanna ;
Felisati, Giovanni ;
Felisati, Dino ;
Festini, Filippo ;
Gaini, Renato Maria ;
Galli, Luisa ;
Gambini, Claudio ;
Gianelli, Umberto ;
Landi, Massimo ;
Lucioni, Marco ;
Mansi, Nicola ;
Mazzantini, Rachele ;
Marchisio, Paola ;
Marseglia, Gian Luigi ;
Miniello, Vito Leonardo ;
Nicola, Marta ;
Novelli, Andrea ;
Paulli, Marco ;
Picca, Marina ;
Pillon, Marta ;
Pisani, Paolo ;
Pipolo, Carlotta ;
Principi, Nicola ;
Sardi, Iacopo ;
Succo, Giovanni ;
Toma, Paolo ;
Tortoli, Enrico ;
Tucci, Filippo ;
Varricchio, Attilio ;
de Martino, Maurizio .
EXPERT REVIEW OF ANTI-INFECTIVE THERAPY, 2015, 13 (12) :1557-1567
[5]   Paediatric neck masses - A diagnostic dilemma [J].
Connolly, AAP ;
MacKenzie, K .
JOURNAL OF LARYNGOLOGY AND OTOLOGY, 1997, 111 (06) :541-545
[6]  
Friberg O, 1988, Int Disabil Stud, V10, P49
[7]   Lymphadenopathy in children: A streamlined approach for the surgeon-A report from the APSA Cancer Committee [J].
Grant, Christa N. ;
Aldrink, Jennifer ;
Lautz, Timothy B. ;
Tracy, Elisabeth T. ;
Rhee, Daniel S. ;
Baertschiger, Reto M. ;
Dasgupta, Roshni ;
Ehrlich, Peter F. ;
Rodeberg, David A. .
JOURNAL OF PEDIATRIC SURGERY, 2021, 56 (02) :274-281
[8]   Influence of postal distribution of The Royal College of Radiologists' guidelines, together with feedback on radiological referral rates, on X-ray referrals from general practice: a randomized controlled trial [J].
Kerry, S ;
Oakeshott, P ;
Dundas, D ;
Williams, J .
FAMILY PRACTICE, 2000, 17 (01) :46-52
[9]   When does an enlarged cervical lymph node in a child need excision? A systematic review [J].
Locke, Richard ;
Comfort, Rachael ;
Kubba, Haytham .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PEDIATRIC OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY, 2014, 78 (03) :393-401
[10]   Ultrasound evaluation of persistent cervical lymph nodes in young children [J].
Meadows, O. ;
Sarkodieh, J. .
CLINICAL RADIOLOGY, 2021, 76 (04) :315.e9-315.e12