Northern Visions? Applying Q methodology to understand stakeholder views on the environmental and resource dimensions of sustainability

被引:59
作者
Curry, Robin [1 ]
Barry, John [2 ]
McClenaghan, Andew [3 ]
机构
[1] Queens Univ Belfast, ISW, Belfast BT9 5AG, Antrim, North Ireland
[2] Queens Univ Belfast, Ctr Sustainabil & Environm Governance, Belfast BT7 1NN, Antrim, North Ireland
[3] NILGA, Belfast BT5 6BQ, Antrim, North Ireland
关键词
Q methodology; sustainability; stakeholder analysis; policy development; POLICY-MAKING APPLICATION; RISK; PARTICIPATION; PERSPECTIVES; DISCOURSES; MANAGEMENT; FOOTPRINT; APPRAISAL; INSIGHTS; SCIENCE;
D O I
10.1080/09640568.2012.693453
中图分类号
F0 [经济学]; F1 [世界各国经济概况、经济史、经济地理]; C [社会科学总论];
学科分类号
0201 ; 020105 ; 03 ; 0303 ;
摘要
Q methodology was used to enable the identification of discourses among stakeholders to the environmental and resource dimensions of sustainability policies and to gain an understanding of the usefulness of Q methodology in informing sustainability policy development. The application of Q methodology has been useful in identifying shared discourses between different stakeholder groups, and providing insights into how stakeholders frame' or understand policy issues; and recommendations are made for ongoing research priorities. These insights, in turn, informed the choice of scenarios for an in parallel process of policy evaluation using Ecological and Carbon Footprinting.
引用
收藏
页码:624 / 649
页数:26
相关论文
共 52 条
[1]   Critically identifying stakeholders evaluating - Boundary critique as a vehicle for stakeholder identification [J].
Achterkamp, Marjolein C. ;
Vos, Janita F. J. .
SYSTEMS RESEARCH AND BEHAVIORAL SCIENCE, 2007, 24 (01) :3-14
[2]  
Anderson E., 2000, ANN AM ACAD POLIT SS, V568, P7
[3]  
Baker Rachel, 2006, J Health Serv Res Policy, V11, P38, DOI 10.1258/135581906775094217
[4]   Seeking sustainability discourses with Q methodology [J].
Barry, J ;
Proops, J .
ECOLOGICAL ECONOMICS, 1999, 28 (03) :337-345
[5]  
Barry J., 2012, The politics of actually existing unsustainability: Existing, flourishing in a climate-changed carbon-contained world
[6]  
Barry J., 2004, DEBATING EARTH, P303
[7]  
Barry J., 2005, STATE GLOBAL ECOLOGI
[8]   Cool rationalities and hot air: A rhetorical approach to understanding debates on renewable energy [J].
Barry, John ;
Ellis, Geraint ;
Robinson, Clive .
GLOBAL ENVIRONMENTAL POLITICS, 2008, 8 (02) :67-+
[9]  
Brown S., 1983, OPERANT SUBJECTIVITY, V16, P91
[10]   Exploring the links between science, risk, uncertainty, and ethics in regulatory controversies about genetically modified crops [J].
Carr, S ;
Levidow, L .
JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURAL & ENVIRONMENTAL ETHICS, 2000, 12 (01) :29-39