Social networks predict patch discovery in a wild population of songbirds

被引:262
作者
Aplin, L. M. [1 ,2 ]
Farine, D. R. [2 ]
Morand-Ferron, J. [2 ]
Sheldon, B. C. [2 ]
机构
[1] Australian Natl Univ, Div Ecol Evolut & Genet, Res Sch Biol, Acton, ACT 0200, Australia
[2] Univ Oxford, Edward Grey Inst Field Ornithol, Oxford OX1 3PS, England
基金
加拿大自然科学与工程研究理事会; 欧洲研究理事会;
关键词
social network theory; social information; Paridae; group foraging; scrounging; local enhancement; INDIVIDUAL-DIFFERENCES; INFORMATION; GREAT; ANIMALS; TRANSMISSION; ECOLOGY; RISK; BLUE; TIT;
D O I
10.1098/rspb.2012.1591
中图分类号
Q [生物科学];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
Animals use social information in a wide variety of contexts. Its extensive use by individuals to locate food patches has been documented in a number of species, and various mechanisms of discovery have been identified. However, less is known about whether individuals differ in their access to, and use of, social information to find food. We measured the social network of a wild population of three sympatric tit species (family Paridae) and then recorded individual discovery of novel food patches. By using recently developed methods for network-based diffusion analysis, we show that order of arrival at new food patches was predicted by social associations. Models based only on group searching did not explain this relationship. Furthermore, network position was correlated with likelihood of patch discovery, with central individuals more likely to locate and use novel foraging patches than those with limited social connections. These results demonstrate the utility of social network analysis as a method to investigate social information use, and suggest that the greater probability of receiving social information about new foraging patches confers a benefit on more socially connected individuals.
引用
收藏
页码:4199 / 4205
页数:7
相关论文
共 47 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 2011, R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2002, Model selection and multimodel inference: a practical informationtheoretic approach
[3]   Animal search strategies: A quantitative. random-walk analysis [J].
Bartumeus, F ;
Da Luz, MGE ;
Viswanathan, GM ;
Catalan, J .
ECOLOGY, 2005, 86 (11) :3078-3087
[4]   The origin and spread of innovations in starlings [J].
Boogert, Neeltje J. ;
Reader, Simon M. ;
Hoppitt, William ;
Laland, Kevin N. .
ANIMAL BEHAVIOUR, 2008, 75 :1509-1518
[5]   Centrality and network flow [J].
Borgatti, SP .
SOCIAL NETWORKS, 2005, 27 (01) :55-71
[6]   CLIFF SWALLOW COLONIES AS INFORMATION-CENTERS [J].
BROWN, CR .
SCIENCE, 1986, 234 (4772) :83-85
[7]   A COMPARISON OF ASSOCIATION INDEXES [J].
CAIRNS, SJ ;
SCHWAGER, SJ .
ANIMAL BEHAVIOUR, 1987, 35 :1454-1469
[8]   Infection in social networks: Using network analysis to identify high-risk individuals [J].
Christley, RM ;
Pinchbeck, GL ;
Bowers, RG ;
Clancy, D ;
French, NP ;
Bennett, R ;
Turner, J .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF EPIDEMIOLOGY, 2005, 162 (10) :1024-1031
[9]   On the relation between social dynamics and social learning [J].
CoussiKorbel, S ;
Fragaszy, DM .
ANIMAL BEHAVIOUR, 1995, 50 :1441-1453
[10]  
Croft DP, 2008, EXPLORING ANIMAL SOCIAL NETWORKS, P1