Protease Inhibitor Monotherapy as Maintenance Regimen in Patients With HIV Infection

被引:12
作者
Calza, Leonardo [1 ]
Manfredi, Roberto [1 ]
机构
[1] Alma Mater Studiorum Univ Bologna, S Orsola Malpighi Hosp, Infect Dis Sect, Dept Internal Med Geriatr & Nephrol Dis, I-40138 Bologna, Italy
关键词
Protease inhibitors; ritonavir; lopinavir; darunavir; monotherapy; efficacy; LOPINAVIR-RITONAVIR MONOTHERAPY; LOPINAVIR/RITONAVIR MONOTHERAPY; ANTIRETROVIRAL THERAPY; ATAZANAVIR-RITONAVIR; VIRAL SUPPRESSION; NUCLEOSIDE ANALOGS; GENITAL-TRACT; MONET TRIAL; PILOT TRIAL; DARUNAVIR/RITONAVIR;
D O I
10.2174/157016212803901419
中图分类号
R392 [医学免疫学]; Q939.91 [免疫学];
学科分类号
100102 ;
摘要
Despite the remarkable success of combination antiretroviral therapy, usually including the association of three antiretroviral drugs selected from two different classes, the possibility of treating HIV-infected patients with one single potent agent as simplified maintenance regimen has attracted clinicians and researchers over the past years. Monotherapy with one ritonavir-boosted protease inhibitor in subjects with persistently suppressed plasma HIV RNA offers several potential advantages, such as avoiding the long-term toxicity associated with nucleoside/nucleotide analog, reducing costs, preventing drug-drug interactions, and preserving future treatment options. Several controlled and uncontrolled studies have assessed efficacy and safety of this monotherapy strategy, and the majority of available data concern lopinavir/ritonavir and darunavir/ritonavir. The virological efficacy of these boosted protease inhibitors as monotherapy is slightly lower than that of standard therapy, but the risk of resistance development is minimal and the re-introduction of nucleoside analogues usually leads to a re-suppression of the plasma viral load. Even though currently there is no consensus about the clinical use of protease inhibitor monotherapy for the treatment of HIV infection, this strategy seems an option for selected patients on stable combination therapy, with persistently suppressed plasma viral load, and without a history of virologic failure while receiving protease inhibitors. The aim of this article is to review and summarize the most recent randomized and observational studies which have evaluated efficacy and safety of the protease inhibitor monotherapy.
引用
收藏
页码:661 / 672
页数:12
相关论文
共 47 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 2011, GUIDELINES USE ANTIR, P1
[2]   The MONET trial: darunavir/ritonavir with or without nucleoside analogues, for patients with HIV RNA below 50 copies/ml [J].
Arribas, Jose R. ;
Horban, Andrzej ;
Gerstoft, Jan ;
Faetkenheuer, Gerdt ;
Nelson, Mark ;
Clumeck, Nathan ;
Pulido, Federico ;
Hill, Andrew ;
van Delft, Yvon ;
Stark, Thomas ;
Moecklinghoff, Christiane .
AIDS, 2010, 24 (02) :223-230
[3]   Lopinavir-Ritonavir Monotherapy Versus Lopinavir-Ritonavir and 2 Nucleosides for Maintenance Therapy of HIV: 96-Week Analysis [J].
Arribas, Jose R. ;
Delgado, Rafael ;
Arranz, Alberto ;
Munoz, Rosa ;
Portilla, Joaquin ;
Pasquau, Juan ;
Perez-Elias, Maria J. ;
Iribarren, Jose A. ;
Rubio, Rafael ;
Ocampo, Antonio ;
Sanchez-Conde, Matilde ;
Knobel, Hernando ;
Arazo, Piedad ;
Sanz, Jesus ;
Lopez-Aldeguer, Jose ;
Montes, Maria L. ;
Pulido, Federico .
JAIDS-JOURNAL OF ACQUIRED IMMUNE DEFICIENCY SYNDROMES, 2009, 51 (02) :147-152
[4]   HIV monotherapy with ritonavir-boosted protease inhibitors: a systematic review [J].
Bierman, Wouter F. W. ;
van Agtmael, Michiel A. ;
Nijhuis, Monique ;
Danner, Sven A. ;
Boucher, Charles A. B. .
AIDS, 2009, 23 (03) :279-291
[5]   Pilot, Randomized Study Assessing Safety, Tolerability and Efficacy of Simplified LPV/r Maintenance Therapy in HIV Patients on the 1st PI-Based Regimen [J].
Cahn, Pedro ;
Montaner, Julio ;
Junod, Patrice ;
Patterson, Patricia ;
Krolewiecki, Alejandro ;
Andrade-Villanueva, Jaime ;
Cassetti, Isabel ;
Sierra-Madero, Juan ;
Casiro, Arnaldo David ;
Bortolozzi, Raul ;
Lupo, Sergio Horacio ;
Longo, Nadia ;
Rampakakis, Emmanouil ;
Ackad, Nabil ;
Sampalis, John S. .
PLOS ONE, 2011, 6 (08)
[6]   A 96-week comparison of lopinavir-ritonavir combination therapy followed by lopinavir-ritonavir monotherapy versus efavirenz combination therapy [J].
Cameron, D. William ;
da Silva, Barbara A. ;
Arribas, Jose R. ;
Myers, Robert A. ;
Bellos, Nicholaos C. ;
Gilmore, Norbert ;
King, Martin S. ;
Bernstein, Barry M. ;
Brun, Scott C. ;
Hanna, George J. .
JOURNAL OF INFECTIOUS DISEASES, 2008, 198 (02) :234-240
[7]   Lopinavir/ritonavir maintenance monotherapy after successful viral suppression with standard highly active antiretroviral therapy in HIV-1-infected patients [J].
Campo, RE ;
Lalanne, R ;
Tanner, TJ ;
Jayaweera, DT ;
Rodriguez, AE ;
Fontaine, L ;
Kolber, MA .
AIDS, 2005, 19 (04) :447-449
[8]   96 week results from the MONET trial: a randomized comparison of darunavir/ritonavir with versus without nucleoside analogues, for patients with HIV RNA <50 copies/mL at baseline [J].
Clumeck, Nathan ;
Rieger, Armin ;
Denes Banhegyi ;
Schmidt, Wolfgang ;
Hill, Andrew ;
Van Delft, Yvonne ;
Moecklinghoff, Christiane ;
Arribas, Jose .
JOURNAL OF ANTIMICROBIAL CHEMOTHERAPY, 2011, 66 (08) :1878-1885
[9]   Lopinavir/ritonavir monotherapy or plus zidovudine and lamivudine in antiretroviral-naive HIV-infected patients [J].
Delfraissy, Jean-Fran Ois ;
Flandre, Philippe ;
Delaugerre, Constance ;
Ghosn, Jade ;
Horban, Andrzej ;
Girard, Pierre-Marie ;
Norton, Michael ;
Rouzioux, Christine ;
Taburet, Anne-Marie ;
Cohen-Codar, Isabelle ;
Van, Philippe Ngo ;
Chauvin, Jean-Pierre .
AIDS, 2008, 22 (03) :385-393
[10]  
EACS website. European AIDS Clinical Society (EACS), 2011, EUR AIDS CLIN SOC EA