Comparison of polymerization contraction stresses between self- and light-curing composites

被引:105
作者
Kinomoto, Y
Torii, M
Takeshige, F
Ebisu, S
机构
[1] Osaka Univ, Fac Dent, Dept Conservat Dent, Suita, Osaka 5650871, Japan
[2] Kagoshima Univ, Sch Dent, Dept Operat Dent & Endodontol, Kagoshima 8900075, Japan
关键词
self- and light-curing composites; polymerization contraction stresses; photoelastic analysis; velocity of polymerization; transparent composite;
D O I
10.1016/S0300-5712(98)00065-7
中图分类号
R78 [口腔科学];
学科分类号
1003 ;
摘要
Objectives: The objective of this study was to examine the distributions and the magnitudes of the internal stresses in self- and a light-curing composite restorations resulting from polymerization shrinkage. Methods: Butt-joint box-shaped cavities (5.0 x 2.0 mm(2), 2.0 mm in depth) prepared in composite molds were filled with either a self- or light-curing transparent resin composite. The restorations were cross-sectioned perpendicular to the longitudinal axes of the cavities and observed using polarizing microscopes. The principal stresses in the restorations, normal and sheer stresses at the cavity wall were evaluated by photoelastic analysis. Results: The distributions of the principal stresses and the stresses generated at the cavity wall in both the self- and the light-curing composite restorations were similar. The maximum stress generated at the cavity wall in the light-curing composite restorations was twice as large as that seen in the self-curing restorations. Conclusions: The results of this study indicated that the difference in the magnitude of the internal stresses between self- and light-curing composites was not related to the distribution of the stresses. The velocity of polymerization appeared to be the most important factor contributing to the magnitude of the internal stresses generated in the composite restorations in this study. (C) 1999 Published by Elsevier Science Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:383 / 389
页数:7
相关论文
共 26 条
[1]   THE DEPENDENCE OF SHRINKAGE STRESS REDUCTION ON POROSITY CONCENTRATION IN THIN RESIN LAYERS [J].
ALSTER, D ;
FEILZER, AJ ;
DEGEE, AJ ;
MOL, A ;
DAVIDSON, CL .
JOURNAL OF DENTAL RESEARCH, 1992, 71 (09) :1619-1622
[2]  
[Anonymous], 1991, DENT MATER
[3]  
BAUM L, 1984, ADV RESTORATIVE DENT, P143
[4]  
Bertolotti R L, 1991, Pract Periodontics Aesthet Dent, V3, P53
[5]   ADHESIVE BONDING OF VARIOUS MATERIALS TO HARD TOOTH TISSUES - IMPROVEMENT IN BOND STRENGTH TO DENTIN [J].
BOWEN, RL ;
COBB, EN ;
RAPSON, JE .
JOURNAL OF DENTAL RESEARCH, 1982, 61 (09) :1070-1076
[6]   COMPRESSIVE PROPERTIES OF ENAMEL, DENTAL CEMENTS, AND GOLD [J].
CRAIG, RG ;
JOHNSON, DW ;
PEYTON, FA .
JOURNAL OF DENTAL RESEARCH, 1961, 40 (05) :936-&
[7]  
DEGEE AJ, 1979, QUINTESSENCE INT, V7, P69
[8]   SETTING STRESS IN COMPOSITE RESIN IN RELATION TO CONFIGURATION OF THE RESTORATION [J].
FEILZER, AJ ;
DEGEE, AJ ;
DAVIDSON, CL .
JOURNAL OF DENTAL RESEARCH, 1987, 66 (11) :1636-1639
[9]   SETTING STRESSES IN COMPOSITES FOR 2 DIFFERENT CURING MODES [J].
FEILZER, AJ ;
DEGEE, AJ ;
DAVIDSON, CL .
DENTAL MATERIALS, 1993, 9 (01) :2-5
[10]  
FROCHT MM, 1941, PHOTOELASTICITY, P144