Conservation Program Participation and Adaptive Rangeland Decision-Making

被引:75
作者
Lubell, M. N. [1 ]
Cutts, B. B. [2 ]
Roche, L. M. [3 ]
Hamilton, M. [1 ]
Derner, J. D. [4 ]
Kachergis, E. [4 ]
Tate, K. W. [3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Calif Davis, Dept Environm Sci & Policy, Davis, CA 95616 USA
[2] Univ Illinois, Dept Nat Resources & Environm Sci, Champaign, IL 61820 USA
[3] Univ Calif Davis, Dept Plant Sci, Davis, CA 95616 USA
[4] ARS, USDA, Rangeland Resources Res Unit, Cheyenne, WY 82009 USA
关键词
ecosystem services; management; social networks; PROPERTY-RIGHTS ORIENTATIONS; BOUNDARY ORGANIZATIONS; MANAGEMENT; TEXAS; POLICY; UTAH; ADOPTION; LAND; DETERMINANTS; PARTNERSHIPS;
D O I
10.2111/REM-D-13-00025.1
中图分类号
Q14 [生态学(生物生态学)];
学科分类号
071012 ; 0713 ;
摘要
This paper analyzes rancher participation in conservation programs in the context of a social-ecological framework for adaptive rangeland decision-making. We argue that conservation programs are best understood as one of many strategies of adaptively managing rangelands in ways that sustain livelihoods and ecosystem services. The framework hypothesizes four categories of variables affecting conservation program participation: operation/operator characteristics, time horizon, social network connections, and social values. Based on a mail survey of California ranchers, multinomial logit models are used to estimate the impact of these variables on different levels of rancher involvement in conservation programs. The findings suggest that ranchers with larger amounts of land, an orientation towards the future, and who are opinion leaders with access to conservation information, are more likely to participate in conservation programs.
引用
收藏
页码:609 / 620
页数:12
相关论文
共 65 条
[1]   Farmers and nature conservation: What is known about attitudes, context factors and actions affecting conservation? [J].
Ahnstrom, Johan ;
Hockert, Jenny ;
Bergea, Hanna L. ;
Francis, Charles A. ;
Skelton, Peter ;
Hallgren, Lars .
RENEWABLE AGRICULTURE AND FOOD SYSTEMS, 2009, 24 (01) :38-47
[2]  
Ajzen I., 1980, UNDERSTANDING ATTITU, DOI [DOI 10.1007/978-3-642-69746-3_2, DOI 10.1007/978-3-642-69746-32]
[3]   Translational Science Partnerships: Key to Environmental Stewardship [J].
Briske, David D. .
BIOSCIENCE, 2012, 62 (05) :449-450
[4]  
Briske DavidD., 2011, CONSERVATION BENEFIT
[5]   Ranching as a conservation strategy: Can old ranchers save the new west? [J].
Brunson, Mark W. ;
Huntsinger, Lynn .
RANGELAND ECOLOGY & MANAGEMENT, 2008, 61 (02) :137-147
[6]   The Elusive Promise of Social-Ecological Approaches to Rangeland Management [J].
Brunson, Mark W. .
RANGELAND ECOLOGY & MANAGEMENT, 2012, 65 (06) :632-637
[7]  
Buttel F.H., 1980, RURAL SOCIOLOGY ADV
[8]  
California Rangeland Trust, 2011, CAL RANG TRUST ANN R
[9]   Beyond participation: Boundary organizations as a new space for farmers and scientists to interact [J].
Carr, A ;
Wilkinson, R .
SOCIETY & NATURAL RESOURCES, 2005, 18 (03) :255-265
[10]  
Christensen J., 2011, HIGH COUNTRY NE 1212